Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09UNROME51
2009-08-17 09:25:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UN Rome
Cable title:  

FAO BUDGET CHIEF PROVIDES DETAILS OF REVISED BUDGET REQUEST,

Tags:  PREL ECON EAGR EAID EFIN UN FAO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4002
PP RUEHRN
DE RUEHRN #0051/01 2290925
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P R 170925Z AUG 09
FM USMISSION UN ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1134
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0354
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEHC/USAID WASHDC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 0228
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0276
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0045
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0043
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0091
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0108
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0055
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 0007
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0043
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0054
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0130
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO 0060
RUEHRN/USMISSION UN ROME 1208
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 UN ROME 000051 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

USDA FOR RIEMENSCHNEIDER; TREASURY FOR L.MORRIS; AID FOR F.MOORE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ECON EAGR EAID EFIN UN FAO
SUBJECT: FAO BUDGET CHIEF PROVIDES DETAILS OF REVISED BUDGET REQUEST,
INCLUDING TREATMENT OF REFORM COSTS

REF: STATE 84087 (NOTAL) - DEMARCHE ON FAO PWB

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 UN ROME 000051

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

USDA FOR RIEMENSCHNEIDER; TREASURY FOR L.MORRIS; AID FOR F.MOORE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ECON EAGR EAID EFIN UN FAO
SUBJECT: FAO BUDGET CHIEF PROVIDES DETAILS OF REVISED BUDGET REQUEST,
INCLUDING TREATMENT OF REFORM COSTS

REF: STATE 84087 (NOTAL) - DEMARCHE ON FAO PWB


1. (U) This message is sensitive but unclassified. Please
handle accordingly.




2. (SBU) Responding to concerns voiced by the U.S. and other
Rome-based missions over the FAO's latest budget request during
a recent meeting of the Finance Committee (septel),FAO
Management revised its draft biennial Program of Work and Budget
(PWB). On August 12, FAO Budget Chief Boyd Haight briefed
Charge and A/DCM on expected adjustments to the PWB including
modalities for funding the organization's reform package (the
Immediate Plan of Action, or IPA). Revisions are expected to
include a reduction of IPA costs from approximately USD 60
million to USD 38 million, as a result of revised assumptions,
tighter scope and longer phasing for some items. Rather than
including only 20 percent of IPA costs under member assessments
("net appropriation") as in the first draft, the revised PWB
will include half the IPA costs (i.e., half of USD 38 million)
under the net appropriation, with the remainder in a "core
voluntary" column funded by extra-budgetary contributions (Note:
During last month's 128th session of the Finance Committee, the
U.S. Vice Chair argued strenuously for all IPA costs to be
covered under member assessments in order to share
responsibility across the membership. This was echoed by EU
colleagues, while G-77 members remained largely silent on the
matter. End note).




3. (SBU) Haight said this was as far as DG Diouf was willing to
go, and that he would not propose any increase to the proposed
net appropriation beyond the USD 995.9 million requested (a
7-plus percent increase from USD 929 million in the 2008-09
budget). It was now "up to the membership to determine how to
proceed," he added. The revised documentation would be first
approved by the Director General on August 13, and then
translated and distributed on or about August 31. A Special
Session of the Finance Committee is expected to meet on
September 18, at which point Management will likely seek Member
endorsement of its revised PWB, ahead of a late-September
Council meeting. The November Conference will approve a final
biennial PWB and adopt the necessary budget resolution.




4. (SBU) On the issue of comparability between the old FAO
budget format and the new results-based budgeting model, Haight
said the revised PWB would contain additional information on
programmatic assumptions and details on how funds are to be
distributed among programs and administration. In addition, six
or seven "Information Notes" will be prepared for Members to
help clarify specifics of where costs and savings are drawn
from. Haight said the revised PWB will contain no reference to
a "maintenance" budget (having drawn negative responses from
many Members, including the U.S., during Finance Committee),and
only one draft Budget Resolution containing 19 chapters broken
down as follows: 11 Strategic Objectives, two Functional
Objectives, and chapters for the FAO-Representatives program,
the Technical Cooperation Program, "contingencies," capital
expenditures, security expenditures, and a transfer to the Tax
Equalization Fund.




5. (SBU) Comment: These assertions and figures are consistent
with what was shared with the Charge by FAO Deputy DG Butler on
August 6, and in a separate discussion with A/DCM on August 11.
It will now be up to members to negotiate an appropriate budget
level. A key item will be the treatment of IPA costs, either
included fully under the net appropriation (e.g., assessments)

UN ROME 00000051 002 OF 002


or partly funded via voluntary contributions (also subject to a
seven percent service/administration fee). Given the current
global financial crisis, we expect there will be less cohesion
among the G-77 than in previous budget cycles, since many will
not want to see their respective assessment increased. Haight
noted that ongoing discussions in New York on the UN scale of
assessments may impact views of several large developing
countries (e.g., Brazil, whose percentage share may increase).
In addition to our OECD colleagues, we may want to consider
close coordination with China, India, Mexico, South Africa,
Egypt and other key regional leaders whose views can strongly
impact their regional partners. End comment.
GLOVERMP