Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09TOKYO888
2009-04-17 08:09:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:
NEW CONSUMER AFFAIRS AGENCY GAINS LOWER HOUSE
how-toVZCZCXRO2313 PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO DE RUEHKO #0888 1070809 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 170809Z APR 09 FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2397 INFO RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 6501 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 4886 RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 3583 RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7384 RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 4119 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS RUEATRS/TREASURY DEPT WASHDC RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 3503 RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC RUEAWJA/JUSTICE DEPT WASHDC
UNCLAS TOKYO 000888
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EAP/J
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN
TREASURY IA FOR DOHNER, WINSHIP, FOSTER
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ
JUSTICE FOR ANTITRUST DIVISION - CHEMTOB
GENEVA FOR USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD POL OECD JA
SUBJECT: NEW CONSUMER AFFAIRS AGENCY GAINS LOWER HOUSE
APPROVAL
REF: TOKYO 850
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE PROTECT ACCCORDINGLY
UNCLAS TOKYO 000888
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EAP/J
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN
TREASURY IA FOR DOHNER, WINSHIP, FOSTER
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ
JUSTICE FOR ANTITRUST DIVISION - CHEMTOB
GENEVA FOR USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD POL OECD JA
SUBJECT: NEW CONSUMER AFFAIRS AGENCY GAINS LOWER HOUSE
APPROVAL
REF: TOKYO 850
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE PROTECT ACCCORDINGLY
1. (U) Summary: The House of Representatives April 17
approved government-sponsored legislation to create a new
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) under the Cabinet office. The
vote was unanimous, indicating disagreement with the
opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has been resolved
and opening the way for the bill to become law during the
current Diet session. End Summary
2. (SBU) The government has not yet released the final text
of the legislation. However, Embassy discussions with
officials in the Cabinet Office and the Japan Fair Trade
Commission, who have been closely involved in the legislative
process, indicate the final bill is very close to the draft
first proposed in 2008. One major change advocated by the
DPJ and reportedly accepted by the ruling party establishes a
quasi-independent consumer commission, consisting of outside,
non-governmental experts, to oversee the work of CAA
bureaucrats.
3. (SBU) The CAA's immediate task, under the law, will be to
establish itself as a consumer advocate within the government
and a clearinghouse for information rather than as a
standard-setting body. In recent scandals involving
mislabeled or dangerous products, there have been complaints
that local governments have failed to share information in a
timely manner. At least in the initial stages, most of the
new CAA's staff will be seconded from existing agencies and
ministries. Contacts at the Japan Fair Trade Commission tell
us they expect some 150 of their staff to transfer, at least
temporarily, to the new agency.
4. (U) The proposal to create a Consumer Affairs agency was
an initiative of former Prime Minister Fukuda but legislation
on this subject had languished since his September 2008
resignation. Prime Minister Aso, taking advantage of his
recently improved public support rate, chose to move the
legislation now, in part to add another accomplishment his
government can claim should he decide to call a snap election
following passage of the proposed 2009 supplemental budget
bill (Ref). The DPJ, stung by scandal allegations against
leader Ichiro Ozawa, did not want to oppose a consumer
protection bill so close to the next Lower House election.
5. (SBU) Comment: The Embassy will focus closely on the
establishment of the new agency and the regulations and
procedures it develops. We are encouraged that so many of
the CAA staff will come from the JFTC, which has a long and
positive relationship with its USG counterpart. The strong
U.S. record on consumer issues and past U.S.-Japan
cooperation on competition issues serve as a model for future
regulator-to-regulator engagement with the CAA. The U.S.'
aim should be to encourage the new agency to ensure its work
is based on the principles of transparency and sound,
science-based standards. We need, in particular, to push the
new agency and other pertinent authorities to avoid
"regulatory double-jeopardy" in which supervision of an
industry ends up divided between an incumbent regulator and
the new CAA. We will also need to be attentive to opinions
of U.S. stakeholders; a number of U.S. firms have already
expressed concerns the CAA might become an anti-market,
pro-protectionist force.
ZUMWALT
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EAP/J
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN
TREASURY IA FOR DOHNER, WINSHIP, FOSTER
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ
JUSTICE FOR ANTITRUST DIVISION - CHEMTOB
GENEVA FOR USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD POL OECD JA
SUBJECT: NEW CONSUMER AFFAIRS AGENCY GAINS LOWER HOUSE
APPROVAL
REF: TOKYO 850
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE PROTECT ACCCORDINGLY
1. (U) Summary: The House of Representatives April 17
approved government-sponsored legislation to create a new
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) under the Cabinet office. The
vote was unanimous, indicating disagreement with the
opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has been resolved
and opening the way for the bill to become law during the
current Diet session. End Summary
2. (SBU) The government has not yet released the final text
of the legislation. However, Embassy discussions with
officials in the Cabinet Office and the Japan Fair Trade
Commission, who have been closely involved in the legislative
process, indicate the final bill is very close to the draft
first proposed in 2008. One major change advocated by the
DPJ and reportedly accepted by the ruling party establishes a
quasi-independent consumer commission, consisting of outside,
non-governmental experts, to oversee the work of CAA
bureaucrats.
3. (SBU) The CAA's immediate task, under the law, will be to
establish itself as a consumer advocate within the government
and a clearinghouse for information rather than as a
standard-setting body. In recent scandals involving
mislabeled or dangerous products, there have been complaints
that local governments have failed to share information in a
timely manner. At least in the initial stages, most of the
new CAA's staff will be seconded from existing agencies and
ministries. Contacts at the Japan Fair Trade Commission tell
us they expect some 150 of their staff to transfer, at least
temporarily, to the new agency.
4. (U) The proposal to create a Consumer Affairs agency was
an initiative of former Prime Minister Fukuda but legislation
on this subject had languished since his September 2008
resignation. Prime Minister Aso, taking advantage of his
recently improved public support rate, chose to move the
legislation now, in part to add another accomplishment his
government can claim should he decide to call a snap election
following passage of the proposed 2009 supplemental budget
bill (Ref). The DPJ, stung by scandal allegations against
leader Ichiro Ozawa, did not want to oppose a consumer
protection bill so close to the next Lower House election.
5. (SBU) Comment: The Embassy will focus closely on the
establishment of the new agency and the regulations and
procedures it develops. We are encouraged that so many of
the CAA staff will come from the JFTC, which has a long and
positive relationship with its USG counterpart. The strong
U.S. record on consumer issues and past U.S.-Japan
cooperation on competition issues serve as a model for future
regulator-to-regulator engagement with the CAA. The U.S.'
aim should be to encourage the new agency to ensure its work
is based on the principles of transparency and sound,
science-based standards. We need, in particular, to push the
new agency and other pertinent authorities to avoid
"regulatory double-jeopardy" in which supervision of an
industry ends up divided between an incumbent regulator and
the new CAA. We will also need to be attentive to opinions
of U.S. stakeholders; a number of U.S. firms have already
expressed concerns the CAA might become an anti-market,
pro-protectionist force.
ZUMWALT