Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09TOKYO320
2009-02-10 08:04:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:  

DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/10/09

Tags:  OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7011
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0320/01 0410804
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 100804Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0688
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4709
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 2365
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 6152
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0206
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2918
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7674
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3694
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 3666
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 000320

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA

SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/10/09

INDEX:

(1) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties (Asahi)

(2) BBC-Yomiuri poll: The world still giving high marks to Japan
(Yomiuri)

(3) Editorial: Removing "Buy American" provision is U.S. President's
duty (Sankei)

(4) Men in uniform back up Obama administration (Sankei)

(5) Defense Ministry official reveals plan for Japan to bear cost of
constructing operating base in Guam (Akahata)

(6) DPJ to decide Feb. 10 on candidates for Lower House election;
Some members unhappy with party's policy of giving priority to
coalition of other opposition parties (Yomiuri)

(7) Study of DPJ (Part 1): No way in sight for building political
leadership; Ozawa says, "Priority on victory elections (Nikkei)

(8) To help prevent global warming, Japan to propose to UN creation
of a body of technology-transfer experts to advise developing
countries on cutting emissions (Nikkei)

There will be no Daily Summary on February 11 - a Japanese holiday.


ARTICLES:

(1) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties

ASAHI (Page 2) (Full)
February 10, 2009

Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage, rounded off. Figures in parentheses
denote the results of the last survey conducted Jan. 10-11, 2009.)

Q: Do you support the Aso cabinet?

Yes 14 (19)
No 73 (67)

Q: Which political party do you support now?

Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 22 (24)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 25 (24)
New Komeito (NK) 3 (2)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 3 (2)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1 (1)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 (0)
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) 0 (0)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0 (0)

Other political parties 0 (0)
None 43 (40)
No answer (N/A) + don't know (D/K) 3 (7)

Q: Do you think the House of Representatives should be dissolved as
early as possible for a general election, or do you otherwise think
there is no need to hurry?

TOKYO 00000320 002 OF 011



Dissolve as early as possible 60 (54)
No need to hurry 31 (35)

Q: If you were to vote now in a general election for the House of
Representatives, which political party would you vote for in your
proportional representation bloc?

LDP 22 (25)
DPJ 42 (38)
NK 3 (3)
JCP 3 (4)
SDP 1 (1)
PNP 0 (0)
RC 0 (0)
NPN 0 (0)
Other political parties 1 (1)
N/A+D/K 28 (28)

Q: Which one between Prime Minister Aso and DPJ President Ichiro
Ozawa do you think is more appropriate for prime minister?

Mr. Aso 20 (26)
Mr. Ozawa 39 (35)

Q: Do you support the idea of raising the consumption tax after
seeing an economic turnaround?

Yes 45
No 47

Q: The government has presented a bill which will prepare the
government by fiscal 2011 to raise the consumption tax. However, the
government has yet to decide when to raise the consumption tax. The
government has now waived its decision on when to raise the
consumption tax. Do you think this is appropriate?

Yes 67
No 21

Q: Do you appreciate Prime Minister Aso's approach for the
consumption tax?

Yes 15
No 72

Q: Concerning the way of business corporations, there is a view
insisting that management should sacrifice job security to a certain
extent for the sake of business profit, and there is also a view
insisting that management should sacrifice business profit to a
certain extent for the sake of job security. Do you think business
profit should come before job security for business corporations, or
do you otherwise think job security should come before business
profit?

Business profit 20
Job security 69

Q: There is a view insisting on work sharing, which shortens each
employee's working hours to share jobs for job security. Fewer
working hours will decrease each employee's earnings, but there will
be more employees. Do you support this idea?

TOKYO 00000320 003 OF 011



Yes 68
No 19

Q: There is a view insisting that business corporations should lower
working conditions for regular workers in order to improve those for
nonregular workers like temporary and part-time workers. Do you
support this idea?

Yes 32
No 51

Q: Do you think the government should totally prohibit the amakudari
("descent from heaven") practice of retired bureaucrats moving into
public corporations or private businesses?

Yes 80
No 15

Q: The government has decided to prohibit its ministries and
agencies from offering amakudari placements for retired or retiring
bureaucrats. Instead, the government has also decided to set up a
placement center within three years. Prime Minister Aso has
clarified that he would move up this schedule to next year. Do you
appreciate this course of action?

Yes 55
No 30

Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Feb. 7-8 over the
telephone on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis.
Respondents were chosen from among the nation's voting population on
a three-stage random-sampling basis. Valid answers were obtained
from 2,036 persons (58 PERCENT ).

(2) BBC-Yomiuri poll: The world still giving high marks to Japan

YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full)
February 8, 2009

The Yomiuri Shimbun and BBC, a British-based broadcaster, conducted
a joint poll in 21 countries and asked respondents if they thought
Japan has had a "good impact" on the world. To this question, a
total of 56 PERCENT answered "yes." However, 23 PERCENT of the
respondents said Japan has had a "bad impact" on the world. The
question was asked about 16 countries and international
organizations that have an influence on the world in the political,
economic, and security areas. Among countries with a good impact,
Germany ranked top at 61 PERCENT , Britain at 58 PERCENT , and
Canada at 57 PERCENT , followed by Japan. In a poll almost a year
ago, as well, Japan's "good impact" rating was 56 PERCENT , ranking
at the top with Germany. This time, Japan slipped but remained
high.

Among countries with a "bad impact," Iran was ranked at the top with
55 PERCENT , followed by Pakistan at 53 PERCENT , and Israel at 51
PERCENT . North Korea's "bad impact" rating was 48 PERCENT , and its
"good impact" rating was 20 PERCENT .

When it comes to the United States, its "good impact" rating was 40
PERCENT , with its "bad impact" rating at 43 PERCENT . With the
Obama administration coming into office, the figures for the United

TOKYO 00000320 004 OF 011


States have improved from its previous 35 PERCENT good and 47
PERCENT bad impact ratings.

The poll was conducted from November last year through February this
year on a face-to-face or telephone interview basis. The Yomiuri
Shimbun covered Japan.

(3) Editorial: Removing "Buy American" provision is U.S. President's
duty

SANKEI (Page 2) (Full)
February 10, 2009

The U.S. Senate will take a vote on an economic stimulus bill
designed to revitalize the U.S. economy possibly on Feb. 10. For the
administration of President Barack Obama, the bill is a touchstone
that will affect its management.

Besides economic stimulus measures such as tax cuts and
infrastructure investment, the stimulus bill contains a serious
problem, that is, a "Buy American" provision, which requires the
U.S. government to use only U.S.-made products for public works
projects. The House of Representatives, which has already given
approval to the bill, has designated only iron and steel products as
subject to obligatory procurement, but the Senate has expanded the
scope of the requirement to include all industrial products.

A matter of concern is that the Obama administration has not
expressed its definite opposition to this protectionist move in the
U.S. Congress. In response to accusing voices from Japan and
European countries, President Obama emphasized the importance of
abiding by the World Trade Organization's (WTO) agreements, but he
stopped short of criticizing the provision itself.

The Senate agreed to require that the provision should be "applied
in a manner consistent with U.S. obligations under international
agreements." Even so, the provision is still in the bill. If the
bill is approved in the Senate, both houses will start work to
coordinate views to iron out differences to come up with a unified
bill.

Unless the provision was removed, global trade and investment flows
might be undermined. President Obama, who has the right to veto,
should urge Congress to delete the provision in a resolute manner.

This provision has been exposed to criticism, because it could grow
the ongoing global recession into a great depression similar to the
one in the 1930s. In 1933, the U.S. enacted the Buy American Act to
obligate the U.S. government to favor U.S. products for its
contracts. This U.S. move prompted many other countries to take
retaliatory acts. As a result, the depression became more serious,
and World War II eventually broke out. We must not allow such a
disaster to occur again.

Free trade brings about international competition, and as a result,
less competitive industries go into a decline, and an increasing
number of people lose their jobs. But global competition is
indisputably the source to general new industries and to renovate
technologies. Free and active trade will help vitalize developing
countries' economies and enrich their people's livelihoods. Postwar
history proves this.


TOKYO 00000320 005 OF 011


The 20 countries and region that participated in the financial
summit last November pledged not to set any new trade barriers over
the next year. The U.S. has a responsibility to fulfill this promise
on its own initiative. Aware of this responsibility, President Obama
should apply pressure to Congress to delete the provision.

(4) Men in uniform back up Obama administration

SANKEI (Page 5) (Excerpts)
February 10, 2009

By Hiroyuki Noguchi

The Obama administration has appointed James Jones, a former Supreme
Allied Commander of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
and a retired United States Marine Corps four-star general, as
assistant to the President for national security affairs. This
should be a model for Japan in making personnel appointments.

Jones bears the heavy responsibility of bringing together such
strong personalities as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Vice
President Joseph Biden, and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
regarding responses to the pressing situations in Afghanistan and
Iraq.

A veteran of the Vietnam War, Jones retired from active duty after
40 years of service. In January 2003, he became the first Marine
Corps general to serve as Supreme Allied Commander, Europe. At the
time, NATO was facing the severest political crisis since its
establishment as France and Germany had announced that they would
not join the Iraq war. Jones' efforts to improve relations with them
have earned him a high reputation. He has become a key presidential
aide in less than two years after retiring from the U.S. Marine
Corps in February 2007.

Further, Dennis Blair, former commander-in-chief of the Pacific
Command and retired Navy Adm. has become director of National
Intelligence who controls 16 intelligence organizations, including
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA). Presidential aides include not only military veterans
but also personnel in active service. (Obama's predecessor)
President George W. Bush named Lieutenant General Douglas Lute as
Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for
Iraq and Afghanistan.

As seen from this, men in uniform back up politics in the United
States. Through my research, I have found that 17 generals are on
loan to such bodies as the White House Military Office, Office of
the Director of National Intelligence, National Counterterrorism
Center, CIA, National Security Agency/Central Security Service,
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and National Reconnaissance
Office, in addition to the National Security Council (NSC).

In Japan, prime ministerial secretaries are appointed mainly from
lawmakers, but there are no Self-Defense Force officials who
directly assist the prime minister.

In the United States, 20 - 30 PERCENT of Senators and
Representatives served in the military in the past. They are now
actively working in the diplomatic and security fields. In Japan,
only two Diet members are former SDF officers. The prime minister
and defense minister require SDF officers' assistance, for the

TOKYO 00000320 006 OF 011


legislative and executive branches are made up of military
amateurs.

In the French military, which is closer to Japan than to the U.S.
military in size, 16 brass officers are serving at key government
security offices.

In Germany, eight brass officers hold major security posts.

U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen visited
India and Pakistan in the first week of December. In the wake of
massive terrorist attacks in Mumbai, his mission was to discuss
remedial measures with the presidents and national security
authorities of the two countries in order to prevent India-Pakistan
relations from being deteriorated. This is tantamount to the Chief
of Staff, Joint Staff, visiting North Korea and South Korea to
encourage them to ease tensions, which is not allowed by the
Japanese government.

Japanese lawmakers rely on bureaucrats in mapping out foreign
security polities, but they do not draw on the expertise of SDF
personnel. A lack of a system allowing policymakers to have direct
access to the insights of SDF officers prevents the government from
making a swift decision in a national crisis.

The political system that does not allow the appointment of SDF
members to key posts testifies to the absence of confidence in the
primacy of politics over the military.

(5) Defense Ministry official reveals plan for Japan to bear cost of
constructing operating base in Guam

AKAHATA (Page 2) (Full)
February 7, 2009

It was learned yesterday that the Japanese government was planning
to foot the bill for constructing a base for an air combat team
under the plan of transferring U.S. Marines in Okinawa to Guam.
Defense Ministry's Defense Policy Bureau Director General Nobushige
Takamizawa revealed this plan in replying to a question by Japanese
Communist Party member Seiken Akamine during a House of
Representatives Budget Committee meeting yesterday. Akamine
assailed: "Your explanation is different from what the government
has explained so far. It is impermissible that tax money will be
used to strengthen a foreign military's base outside the nation."

The Japanese government has announced that it will bear only the
costs of constructing such facilities as a headquarters building,
housing as well as school buildings and will not pay for facilities
for combat units."

Takamizawa replied: "Is necessary to build a facility for air combat
team members to exercise with Marines in Andersen Air Force Base in
northern Guam. The Japanese government will undertake an
infrastructure construction project." He also revealed plans to
improve infrastructure at Apra Harbor in western Guam.

Akamine criticized the infrastructure construction plan for the
Andersen base as "indisputably tantamount to building the base of
the air combat unit." Further, pointing out that Apra Harbor is a
spot for landing craft utilities and amphibious assault ships to
reach, Akamine argued: "Japan is about to pay for the U.S.

TOKYO 00000320 007 OF 011


government to reinforce its military bases on Guam in a bid to make
the island of Guam a hub base, like Hawaii and Okinawa. ... When the
nation's economy is sinking deeper and its job market is in a state
of collapse, the government is about to use tax money for the U.S.
plan to reinforce its military bases."

(6) DPJ to decide Feb. 10 on candidates for Lower House election;
Some members unhappy with party's policy of giving priority to
coalition of other opposition parties

YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full)
February 8, 2009

The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ),the largest opposition force,
will decide on Feb. 10 on a third group of its candidates for the
next general election of the House of Representatives. The DPJ will
officially endorse about 260 candidates, including other opposition
candidates to whom it has given recommendations. Assuming that the
Lower House will be dissolved for a snap election in April
immediately after the Diet passage of a fiscal 2009 budget, DPJ
President Ichiro Ozawa will soon narrow down the priority
single-seat constituencies.

The DPJ has so far officially endorsed 239 candidates and has
unofficially decided 23 candidates. It looks now that the party will
officially endorse most of the 23 candidates, following the
selection of the third group of its candidates on Feb. 10.

However, Ozawa intends to shake up the ruling parties by not
clarifying the electoral district for which he will run until around
when the Lower House is dissolved. Therefore, the DPJ plans not to
decide on candidates for the Iwate No. 4 electoral district, which
Ozawa now represents, the Tokyo No. 12 district, for which New
Komeito leader Akihiro Ota will run, and the Hyogo No. 8 district,
in which former New Komeito Secretary General Tetsuzo Fuyushiba will
stand.

The DPJ has decided to recommend candidates of other opposition
parties (including independent candidates) in 22 single-seat
constituencies. In addition, The DPJ and Social Democratic Party
(SDP) have decided to jointly recommend an independent candidate to
run in the Toyama No. 3 electoral district race. The outlook is that
there will ultimately about 10 electoral districts for which the DPJ
will file no candidate. The 10 electoral districts include the Gunma
No. 4 district, which is now represented by former Prime Minister
Yasuo Fukuda.

Ozawa has expressed strong enthusiasm for the coalition of
opposition parties. When choosing a candidate for the Toyama No. 3
constituency, Ozawa gave priority to cooperation between the DPJ and
SDP over the candidate picked by the DPJ Toyama prefectural chapter.
In the Miyazaki No. 1 district, as well, although an independent
candidate wanted to be endorsed by the DPJ, the party decided, in
accordance with Ozawa's wish, to recommend a single candidate along
with other opposition parties. Forgoing fielding its own candidates
in some electoral districts in the prefectures of Akita, Yamagata,
Kagawa, Ehime, Saga and Kumamoto, the DPJ has built a system for
election cooperation with the SDP in which the two parties mutually
recommend each other's candidates. As to why Ozawa in particular
places priority on election cooperation with the SDP, Ozawa's aide
explained, saying:


TOKYO 00000320 008 OF 011


"There are unions supporting the DPJ or SDP in the National
Confederation of Trade Unions (Rengo). If the two parties form joint
front, Rengo's organizational power will double or triple."

A senior SDP member also said: "It is the first time for the SDP to
build such a convenient formation for an election. I thank Mr.
Ozawa."

However, there is also smoldering discontent among party members. A
senior prefectural chapter member in the Tohoku region, which gave
up filing its candidate in order to recommend a candidate on the SDP
ticket, said: "As there are many conservatives among supporters in
our prefecture, they will not vote for SDP candidates. The LDP will
triumph in the end. Those who are unhappy with the party's decision
might throw a hat in the race."

(7) Study of DPJ (Part 1): No way in sight for building political
leadership; Ozawa says, "Priority on victory elections

NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full)
February 10, 2009

With the Aso cabinet and the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)
suffering setbacks, the major opposition Democratic Party of Japan
(DPJ) is now eyeing taking over the reins of government by winning
the next House of Representatives election. Due to the ongoing
global economic hardship, further political turmoil will have an
immense impact on the livelihoods of the people. Will the DPJ
smoothly be able to take over the reins of government? Will it be
able to implement its campaign pledges, including reform of the
central government bureaucracy? The newspaper looked into moves in
the DPJ to prepare for assumption of power.

"We must focus all our energy to changing the bureaucracy-led
government into a people's government," DPJ Secretary General Yukio
Hatoyama said in a speech delivered yesterday in Osaka. He also
said: "For example, we will ask bureau director general and
higher-ranking officials to tender their resignations. We would like
to make sure whether they will carry out our policy." He indicated
that his party would force bureaucrats to take litmus tests.

There has been a surge in momentum in the DPJ to create a
transitional government plan. Policy Research Committee Deputy Chair
Akira Nagatsuma in January asked the party executive to submit ideas
to Hatoyama. Nagatsuma is looking into a roadmap for an
administration led by politicians.

The period between the Lower House election and a special Diet
session, which is convened within 30 days after the election, is
important for the preparations for a transitional government. DPJ
President Ichiro Ozawa intends to announce on the day before the
Lower House election key "Next Cabinet" members, who are candidates
for new cabinet portfolios. Some DPJ members have proposed setting
up a transition preparation committee made up of the party executive
members and prospective candidates for cabinet ministers soon after
the party wins the snap election, in order to discuss the
appointments of the Prime Minister's Official Residence (Kantei)
staff members and senor ministry officials.

Deputy President Naoto Kan also has started drafting his own plan
for a transitional government. He envisages a policy discussion for
about one week between the prime minister and prospective candidates

TOKYO 00000320 009 OF 011


for cabinet ministers. Kan and other party members share a sense of
alarm that if preparations are insufficient, the framework of a
government will be decided under the lead of bureaucrats.

However, when to convene a special Diet session would have been
decided by the government, that dissolved the Lower House, so a new
government might have to open the special session even though
preparations are insufficient. The possibility is strong that there
won't be enough time for the DPJ to hold policy consultations with
the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and People's New Party (PNP).

There are many problems to fend off creating a framework for bold
political leadership. Regarding Ozawa's idea of sending more than
100 Diet members to a government, for instance, amendments to the
Cabinet Law and National Administration Organization Law are
indispensable for increasing the number of senior vice ministers and
parliamentary secretaries.

As a special Diet session usually runs several days, the DPJ
envisions holding an extraordinary session about one month after the
special session. If the formation of a government takes too much
time, such could invite criticism about creating a political vacuum.
There is also a view in the party that a system should be devised so
that things would be changed without legal revisions.

The administration of Prime Minister Morihiro Hosokawa, launched in
1993, was busily occupied by consultations on a coalition of non-LDP
forces. The DPJ compiled in 1998 a report, in which the party judged
that the Hosokawa administration heavily relied on certain ministry
bureaucrats. It then asserted that when a government carries out
drastic structural reform, considerable preparations are required.

On the night of Jan. 15, Ozawa, Kan and Hatoyama got together at a
Japanese restaurant in Setagaya Ward, Tokyo. Kan and Hatoyama
proposed that Ozawa start making a transitional administration plan,
but Ozawa has not given them any directions. He has said that top
priority is to win the election and take over the political reins.
Ozawa's aide said: "If the framework of the new government has been
revealed, the prime minister's political hands would be tied. The
prime minister should have free hands."

When asked reporters about a transition plan after the party
convention in January, Ozawa pointed out: "When time comes for Lower
House dissolution, a plan will be necessary." Eventually, Ozawa will
decide a plan on his own judgment.

(8) To help prevent global warming, Japan to propose to UN creation
of a body of technology-transfer experts to advise developing
countries on cutting emissions

NIKKEI (Page 5) (Full)
February 6, 2009

The government has finalized a new proposal that would create an
international framework for curbing greenhouse gas emissions
(post-Kyoto Protocol) to be adopted in 2013. The full text of the
proposal has been revealed. Japan will ask the United Nations to set
up a body of experts to help transfer to developing countries the
technologies needed to cut greenhouse gas emissions. On the question
of setting a mid-term goal for cutting emissions, Japan will simply
propose without indicating its own figure that all countries come up
with reduction levels that can be achieve through self-help

TOKYO 00000320 010 OF 011


efforts.

UN talks on the post-Kyoto Protocol framework are slated to end in
late 2009. The government plans to submit the proposal to the
secretariat of the Climate Change Convention possibly today. It will
also submit the proposal at a taskforce meeting to be held in Bonn
in late March and seek understanding from the concerned countries.
The secretariat is set to present a specific plan for a post-Kyoto
framework, based on proposals made by various countries, possibly by
June.

In the proposal, Japan calls on the UN to set up an advisory group
to give advice to developing countries regarding what technologies
are needed in cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The envisaged group
would bring together experts from such key industries as steel,
electric power and cement in leading countries so as to promote
technology transfer to developing countries.

Major countries are starting to issue mid-term goals for emissions
cuts, the major purpose for creating the post-Kyoto framework.
However, Japan will put off presenting any specific figure. Prime
Minister Taro Aso at the annual meeting of World Economic Forum
(Davos Conference) at the end of January announced a plan to reveal
Japan's mid-term goal by June.

Japan will call on industrialized countries to present emissions
that can be reduced through their own efforts and start talks based
on that level. Regarding those portions to be reduced by purchasing
CO2 emissions credits from abroad, the proposal states that such
should not be included in the goals.

The EU has put up a mid-term goal of cutting by 2020 greenhouse gas
emissions by 20 PERCENT from the 1990 level. It plans to achieve
one-third of that amount by purchasing emissions credit from abroad.
Japan's proposal would seem to check such a method.

Detailed rules on emissions quotas to be included in the post-Kyoto
framework have yet to be set. In order to ensure impartiality, Japan
has determined that talks should be pursued based on the pure amount
of emissions to be reduced.

Japan will propose that various countries map out and share a road
map for the development of new technologies, such as technologies
for solar energy generation or new nuclear power generation, in
cooperation with the International Energy Agency (IEA). Emerging
countries, such as China, are seeking the charge-free disclosure of
intellectual properties for cutting CO2 emissions. However, the
package rejects such a request. It maintains that intellectual
properties should be protected properly in order to support
sustainable investment in R&D by private companies.

The package also includes proposals that have been made previously:
(1) concerned countries share a goal of halving the emissions of
greenhouse gases in the world by 2050; and (2) fast emerging and
developing countries set obligatory energy-saving goal under the
post-Kyoto framework.

Points of Japan's new proposals for post-Kyoto Protocol

Concerned countries share a goal of halving greenhouse gas
emissions in the world by 2050.
Each industrialized country set an emissions cut goal.

TOKYO 00000320 011 OF 011


Industrialized countries set more than one base year in setting a
reduction goal
Industrialized countries discuss pure amount of emissions they can
reduce first and use purchases of CO2 emission credit from abroad as
a supplementary means.
Fast emerging and developing countries set an energy-saving goal
Establish an advisory organ to promote technology transfer

Mid-term goal of key countries (by 2020)

Base year Goal
Japan Under consideration To be released by June
EU 1990 20 PERCENT
U.S. 1990 0 PERCENT
Canada 2006 20 PERCENT
Australia 2000 5 PERCENT
(NB) U.S. figures are based on a pledge made by President Obama.

ZUMWALT