Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09TASHKENT1501
2009-09-18 08:47:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

Uzbekistan: Hidirova Describes Her Imprisonment

Tags:  PREL PHUM ELAB PGOV UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8813
RR RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW RUEHSL
DE RUEHNT #1501/01 2610847
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 180847Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1334
INFO ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
CIS COLLECTIVE
NATO EU COLLECTIVE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0029
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0222
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TASHKENT 001501 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO USOFFICE ALMATY
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/09/18
TAGS: PREL PHUM ELAB PGOV UZ
SUBJECT: Uzbekistan: Hidirova Describes Her Imprisonment

REF: TASHKENT 1479; TASHKENT 1437

CLASSIFIED BY: Holly Lindquist Thomas, Pol/Econ Officer, Tashkent;
REASON: 1.4(B),(D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TASHKENT 001501

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO USOFFICE ALMATY
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/09/18
TAGS: PREL PHUM ELAB PGOV UZ
SUBJECT: Uzbekistan: Hidirova Describes Her Imprisonment

REF: TASHKENT 1479; TASHKENT 1437

CLASSIFIED BY: Holly Lindquist Thomas, Pol/Econ Officer, Tashkent;
REASON: 1.4(B),(D)


1. (SBU) Post reported earlier this summer on the arrest and
release of Jizzakh farmer and human rights activist Oyazimhon
Hidirova (aka Khidirova),who spent roughly five weeks in jail
after being arrested on charges of hooliganism. (See reftels.)
Hidirova and her public defender Ziyodullo Razzakov met with poloff
on September 10 to discuss her imprisonment and current legal
status. She gave the following account.



The Basis for the Complaint

--------------


2. (SBU) Hidirova used to be the head of a collective farm in
Jizzakh, an area about two hours southwest of Tashkent. As a
result of land reforms implemented last fall and perhaps due to her
advocacy for farmers, she lost her position. She is now
responsible for a small plot of land that is a part of the
collective farm, and she reports to the head of that collective
farm, Alma Sadikov. Earlier this year, she spoke out against a
district hokim, complaining that he was engaged in corruption and
fraud, and was withholding social payments. She wrote a complaint
letter to the regional hokim and to President Karimov about the
problem. The district hokim was fired from his position in the
spring.




3. (SBU) Concerned about the crops, Hidirova went to the head
of the collective farm in June to tell Sadikov it was time to
collect the grain. When she arrived, he was drunk, and a skirmish
broke out between them. Hidirova broke her finger and filed a
report the next day. He also filed a report and claimed to have
been injured in the skirmish.



Initial Arrest and Confinement

--------------




4. (C) On July 27 (a few weeks after the incident),three

people came to Hidirova's house and asked her to come to the police
station. She went the next morning, and was accused of beating up
Sadikov, as well as of tax evasion, fraud, and presenting
fraudulent documents. She refused to sign a confession that was
presented to her, and she was taken to a pre-trial detention
facility, where she was told she would be for three days. She was
beaten in custody, but her request for medical attention was
denied. She announced a three-day hunger strike, and on the third
day she lost consciousness. She was told she received medical
treatment, but she has no recollection of the four days that
followed. When she awoke, she was in the same pretrial detention
facility, and her leg was swollen as if from being beaten.




5. (C) At the detention center, she was made to sweep the
floors, clean the toilets, and clean the dishes of the other
inmates. The guards told her that their superiors had warned them
that she was dangerous. She slept on a concrete floor, and from
time to time the guards would close all the windows and fill the
room with hot steam. She described the conditions as "worse than
those for dogs."

TASHKENT 00001501 002 OF 003



6. (C) After a few days, she was told she was being
transported to a medical facility, but instead was taken to a
prison. A guard there told her that his orders were to beat her if
she showed any resistance. At one point, she was told she had a
visitor and was taken to another room. A guard then struck her
repeatedly, until a doctor came. After that she was kept in a cell
with other women, who protested and shielded her from a guard who
tried to take her away again.




7. (C) After six days, Hidirova was returned to the pre-trial
detention cell, and from then on was transported back and forth
periodically. An investigator presented her with a confession to
sign, and told her that the she would stay in prison until she
agreed. The investigator told her they had 35 witnesses who would
testify against her in court - she didn't recognize any of their
names. Her attorney advised her to admit partial guilt, which she
did.




8. (C) On August 28, the Uzbek parliament issued an amnesty
decree. Hidirova's attorney filed an application with the court
immediately, requesting her release. On August 30, a court hearing
was held, and the investigator told her she needed to agree to
recant her earlier claims on video tape, or face five to six years
in prison. She refused to recant. On August 31, the court
unexpectedly granted amnesty and released her. Hidirova returned
home to find her cotton fields unattended and drying out.



Still Awaiting Conclusion

--------------




9. (C) As of September 10, the criminal case against Hidirova
was not yet concluded. The Court did not issue a written decision
following her release, and had yet to determine whether she would
have a criminal record, or whether it would impose a fine.
Hidirova's human rights colleague and public defender (unlicensed
attorney who assists during the case) stated that he believed the
Court was waiting for some further commentary from the parliament
on amnesty before it completed the case. He worries, however, that
Hidirova will still be slapped with a significant fine (the
prosecutor suggested 7 million sum, or about $5000),or that the
Court will take her remaining land in lieu of damages. Hidirova
may face continued harassment, as well, as the prosecutor warned
her after her release to stay silent, threatening that he would go
after her and her family again.



Comment

--------------




10. (C) Hidirova's first-hand account of her experience was a
riveting and sad commentary on what can happen when someone crosses
the wrong local official or steps too far out of bounds in
Uzbekistan. The fact that the court granted amnesty in this case
suggests one of two things, however: a) the court acted
independently, meaning that there was effective separation of power
between the judicial and executive branches; or b) someone higher
up in the executive branch, whether due to international pressure,
ideals of justice, or some other reason, determined that this case

TASHKENT 00001501 003 OF 003


should not go forward. Regardless of the reason, the release of a
human rights activist was an uncommon and welcome step. Hidirova
is relieved to have escaped further incarceration. It's not clear
whether she will continue to speak out on farmers' issues.
NORLAND