Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STOCKHOLM452
2009-07-23 10:04:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Stockholm
Cable title:  

U.S.-EU JHA SENIOR LEVEL MEETING, STOCKHOLM, JULY 9-10,

Tags:  PGOV PINR PREL SW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4525
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSL RUEHSR RUEHVK
RUEHYG
DE RUEHSM #0452/01 2041004
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 231004Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4548
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAWJB/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STOCKHOLM 000452 

STATE FOR EUR/NB, EUR/ERA, EUR/PGI, S/CT
DHS FOR MCALLAHAN, LSAADAT, MSCARDAVILLE, SBALLARD
JUSTICE FOR BSWARTZ, TBURROWS, NLIBIN


SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958:N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR PREL SW

SUBJECT: U.S.-EU JHA SENIOR LEVEL MEETING, STOCKHOLM, JULY 9-10,
2009

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STOCKHOLM 000452

STATE FOR EUR/NB, EUR/ERA, EUR/PGI, S/CT
DHS FOR MCALLAHAN, LSAADAT, MSCARDAVILLE, SBALLARD
JUSTICE FOR BSWARTZ, TBURROWS, NLIBIN


SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958:N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR PREL SW

SUBJECT: U.S.-EU JHA SENIOR LEVEL MEETING, STOCKHOLM, JULY 9-10,
2009


1. (SBU) Summary. U.S. and EU delegations met July 9 and 10 in
Stockholm for the semiannual U.S.-EU Justice and Home Affairs
Informal Senior Level Meeting. The meeting was unusually lively,
substantive and outcome oriented, covering a lengthy agenda in an
efficient manner. Delegates were well prepared and achieved concrete
results on nearly all the topics on the agenda, from agreements to
exchange papers or schedule follow-on experts' meetings, to
commitments to enhance cooperation or improve the efficiency of
regular U.S.-EU engagements. Throughout the meeting, the Swedish
Presidency chair demonstrated a proactive and positive approach to
the engagement and sought to identify opportunities where the U.S.
and EU could move forward during the Swedish Presidency. End
Summary.
Delegations
--------------

2. (U) The U.S. delegation was led by Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State Elizabeth Verville and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Bruce
Swartz. The EU delegation was led by Lars Werkstrom, Director
General for International Affairs, Ministry of Justice, and Ola
Henrikson, Director General for Migration and Asylum Policy,
Ministry of Justice, representing the Swedish EU Presidency; Arturo
Avello, Director General for International Affairs, Spanish Ministry
of the Interior, on behalf of the incoming EU Presidency; Monique
Pariat, Director, General Affairs, DG JLS, European Commission; and
Rafael Fernandez-Pita y Gonzalez, Deputy Director General, General
Secretariat of the Council of the European Union.
Swedish Presidency Priorities
--------------


3. (U) The Swedish Presidency briefly outlined its JHA priorities
for the next six months, focusing on the adoption of the EU's next
five-year plan in the areas of justice and home affairs, dubbed the
Stockholm Program to succeed the previous Hague Program. The new
program will have a central focus on individual rights but will also
include attention to safeguarding security. This will include new
procedural rights for criminal suspects (including requiring
translation and interpretation assistance to defendants where
needed),the completion of a new Schengen Information System (SIS

II) and new legislation on trafficking in persons and the sexual
exploitation of children. The Presidency will also contribute toward
the development of a common asylum system, and introduce a Visa
Information System (VIS) in December. External relations with third
countries will be a large component of this program, according to
Sweden.


4. (SBU) The U.S. also outlined its priorities of concluding an
agreement on the High Level Contact Group Principles on information
exchange in JHA matters and data protection, exchanging instruments
of ratification with the EU on the US-EU Mutual Legal Assistance and
Extradition Treaties, ensuring that the SECI (Southeast European
Cooperation Initiative) charter is completed soon and in a manner
that allows it to proceed effectively (i.e., protecting data without
hamstringing with layers of bureaucracy) and multilateral
cooperation on organized crime and corruption.

5. (SBU) The delegations discussed at length the EU proposal,
previewed at the U.S.-EU JHA Ministerial Meeting in Prague in April,
to develop a declaration on enhancing transatlantic relations in the
area of justice and home affairs. The U.S. stressed the need to
include concrete commitments for operationally focused cooperation
in specific terrorism and transnational crime areas, and agreed to
propose text in this regard. The group agreed to have their
respective Brussels representatives prepare an initial draft.
Data protection/privacy
--------------

6. (SBU) The delegations agreed that the High Level Contact Group
(HLCG) had almost finished its task. Only the issue of redress
remains outstanding. The Swedish Presidency noted that the recent
visit to Stockholm of the Department of Homeland Security new Chief
Privacy Officer had been helpful. The EU offered to host a seminar
October 1 in Brussels for representatives from the U.S., EU, and a
small group of EU Member States for the purpose of gaining a better
understanding of what redress opportunities are available in the
U.S. and the Member States. The U.S. suggested that such a meeting
include law enforcement practitioners as well as data privacy
specialists and that the group also discusses criminal redress. A
HLCG meeting has been scheduled for October 2 as a follow-up. Both
sides expressed hope that this seminar would pave the way for
completion of the HLCG principles in time for the October JHA Troika
Ministerial meeting.
Mutual legal assistance and extradition
--------------

7. (SBU) The U.S. delegation welcomed the completion, since the

STOCKHOLM 00000452 002 OF 004


last JHA Informal meeting in February, of MLA ratification
procedures in all EU member states. Bilateral exchanges of the
protocols of the instruments of ratification have taken place
between the U.S. and eighteen of the twenty-seven EU Member States.
The remaining exchanges are expected to be completed by September,
readying the way to schedule the exchange of instruments between the
U.S. and EU in the early fall, potentially on the margins of the
U.S.-EU JHA Troika Ministerial meeting. Sweden stressed the
importance of exchanging the instruments before the entry into force
of the Lisbon Treaty, as structural changes occurring then would
seriously complicate this process.

8. (SBU) Regarding implementation of the agreements, the U.S.
pressed the importance of ensuring full application of the
agreements and that all EU member states have the mechanisms in
place to meet all the agreed-upon requirements, especially with
respect to prompt responses to requests for mutual legal assistance
and financial records information. The U.S. believes a discussion of
the provision providing for joint investigative teams would be
fruitful, taking into account Spain's experience with this mechanism
in Europe. It was noted that the EUROJUST-EU-U.S. work group on
preparing practitioners for the agreements' coming into force had
drafted manuals, guidelines, and forms for use by
prosecutors/investigating magistrates and criminal investigators.
The work group had resolved to monitor implementation after entry
into force of the agreements for purposes of determining where
further support, training and assistance might be needed. As
incoming Presidency country, Spain suggested that a practitioners'
seminar be organized some months following the agreements' entry
into force to assess the implementation and to provide additional
training.
U.S.-EU Cooperation in the Balkans
--------------


9. (SBU) The U.S. noted that coordination between the EU and U.S.
on our respective technical assistance to the Balkan countries has
steadily progressed in recent years. At the February U.S.-EU JHA
informal meeting, both sides discussed holding expert level
discussions on our assistance in the region. Our experts have agreed
to hold an initial video conference on Croatian assistance in late
September/October. If this goes well, additional meetings could be
discussed. The European Commission (EC) agreed that our objectives
are in sync, and look forward to the fall videoconference.


10. (SBU) On the Southeast European Cooperation Initiative (SECI),
the U.S. expressed strong concern over the EU inappropriately having
re-opened and re-directed the drafting of the new SECI charter
(SELEC Convention). Specifically, EU representatives had
side-tracked the nearly completed drafting of the convention by
insisting on inserting a detailed list of data protection rules that
were inappropriate given SECI's current or envisioned level of
development. The U.S. expressed concern that the ongoing successful
functioning of this extraordinary law enforcement collaborative
might well be impaired by the eleventh hour insertion of these
poorly-suited rules and requirements. It was agreed that the
U.S.-EU cooperation needs to improve on SECI, so that the
organization can continue to function as a linchpin for regional law
enforcement cooperation. The EU took this message on board and both
sides agreed to discuss this issue in more detail.


11. (SBU) On West Africa, the Swedish Presidency is planning a donor
coordination meeting September 18, in Brussels. This meeting will
include discussion on organized crime and trafficking in drugs,
weapons, and human beings. The U.S., the UN, Interpol and other
major donors will be invited. The U.S. praised the recent decisions
to develop a series of DVCs to better coordinate technical
assistance between the U.S. and EU in this region.

Cooperation at the UN
--------------


12. (SBU) The U.S. noted the close cooperation between the U.S. and
EU in UN settings, particularly in promoting the global
implementation of the UN Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime (UNTOC) and the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). Both
sides need to continue to consult closely on what would be
appropriate for a new mechanism for the UNTOC and the UNCAC.
Consideration of such a mechanism was more urgently needed for the
UNCAC as the next UNCAC Conference of States Parties will take place
in November, in Doha. It is essential that this COSP secure adoption
of a review mechanism, and the EU and U.S. need to stay closely
aligned both in capitals and particularly at the negotiation level,
in Vienna. The EU agreed to join in working with states that have

STOCKHOLM 00000452 003 OF 004


seemed difficult during past UNCAC negotiations and agreed with the
U.S. that this next COSP must lead to a review mechanism. The
Commission in particular believes that public country reports should
be included, perhaps with opt-outs for countries that remain opposed
to this approach. Both the U.S. and EU pledged to continue to
provide technical assistance towards countries seeking to implement
both conventions, and to coordinate TOC assistance through the UNTOC
technical working group on assistance.

Trafficking in Persons
--------------

13. (SBU) The Swedish Presidency noted the EU's current internal
review of its new Framework Decision on trafficking in Human Beings
(THB) - what in the U.S. is typically referred to as Trafficking in
Persons (TIP). This new framework will underpin an EU conference on
the external relations aspect of TIP in Brussels October 19-20, to
which the U.S. will be invited. The U.S. informed that TIP is a high
priority of the new U.S. Administration, and noted that the U.S. is
very interested in closely coordinating with the EU on the issue of
a potential UN Global Plan of Action to combat TIP. The U.S. is
skeptical of the benefits of this exercise, and fear it could result
in a weakening of the UN Protocol. Nevertheless, the U.S. will
engage constructively in negotiations if this does take place. The
EU agreed with the U.S. assessment, and identified the Swedish
Presidency's mission in Brussels as the likely POC for coordination,
along with the EU mission at the UN in New York. The U.S. noted the
multiple facets of the human trafficking dossier that offer many
avenues of potential transatlantic cooperation (e.g., detection,
deterrence, investigation, prosecution, public awareness).
Cybercrime
--------------

14. (SBU) The delegations discussed the need to encourage greater
ratification of the Council of Europe (COE) Cybercrime convention,
including among members of the EU and COE as well as non-EU or COE
countries. The U.S. stressed the need to avoid negotiating a UN
convention on cybercrime that would divert limited resources, delay
implementation, and dilute important advances of the COE convention,
and the EU agreed. The group agreed to report back on their
respective efforts at the next U.S.-EU JHA Ministerial. Spain also
expressed its support for the U.S. position.
Counterterrorism and security
--------------

15. (U) The Swedish Presidency announced plans to organize a
seminar July 28-29 on radicalization in prisons, and invited the
U.S. to participate. The U.S. noted special interest by the new
Ambassador for Counterterrorism in the issues of countering violent
extremism and terrorists' use of the internet for recruitment and
radicalization.

16. (SBU) The next experts meeting on explosives is planned for
November or December. The EU said that at the end of October it
will invite a small number of experts to its task force meeting to
discuss the science behind explosives. This is the follow-up to the
very well received first experts meeting in December 2008 in
Brussels, at which the U.S. was represented by FBI, DOJ, DHS, ATF,
and State/DS.
Passenger Name Record
--------------

17. (SBU) The EU reported that six member states have not completed
domestic ratification procedures of the 2007 U.S.-EU Passenger Name
Record agreement. In preparation for the planned joint review of
the agreement, the EU has provided a questionnaire to the U.S.
Following the EC's postponement of the review from December 2008,
the Department of Homeland Security has not yet proposed a date for
the review, but the Commission expressed hope that this could take
place as soon as possible. DHS reported significant progress with
most major air carriers to migrate to the "push" system of PNR data
to DHS rather than DHS "pulling" the data from carriers. The U.S.
and EU agree as a goal to move from pull to push.

18. (SBU) In the area of critical infrastructure protection, the
U.S. called for close coordination to address interdependencies both
nationally and internationally as the EU makes progress on its
Framework Decision, and stressed the importance of science and
technology. The U.S. requested more information with respect to the
EU's plans in the area of cyber-security which was addressed in a
recent EC communication from DG InfoSys. The U.S. announced that
October is Cyber Security Awareness month and it would be hosting a
Meridian program in October, and invited broad participation from
the EU, promising more details as the agenda is finalized.

19. (U) The U.S. briefly described the White House 60 day
Cyberspace Review and its general findings. The Swedes announced
the Euro Atlantic Stakeholders Conference (EASC 09) hosted jointly
by Sweden and DHS on October 1-2 in Stockholm that will follow a

STOCKHOLM 00000452 004 OF 004


regular EU forum on research on September 29-30 in Sweden.

20. (SBU) The Commission has formally communicated the 'EU
Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Action Plan'
to the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament.
The action plan itself has no legal or budgetary authority--its
provisions will only be given effect to the extent that they are
authorized/funded by future EU action, or come under existing
authorities. The Action Plan is based on the CBRN Task Force report
issued in January. It addresses three main areas of work:
prevention, detection, and preparedness/response. In addition, the
Commission communicated an 'impact assessment' document and a
document on best practices in CBRN security and response.
Visas and Migration
--------------

21. (SBU) The U.S. provided several updates on issues related to
the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). The Electronic System for Travel
Authorization (ESTA) is operating well, with an average 85 per cent
compliance rate. The U.S. informed of its plans to look at possible
elimination of the I-94 document in the not too distant future and
moving from voluntary to enforced ESTA compliance. The EU expressed
concern at this announcement, asking how the compliance rate would
get from 85 to 100 per cent. The U.S. additionally reported that as
of July 1, 2009, all travelers under the Visa Waiver Program must
have e-passports or have a visa (in case of a temporary emergency
passport). The U.S. is conducting an outreach campaign to airlines,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, and U.S.
embassies and consulates abroad. On plans to develop a U.S.
biometric exit system, the U.S. is in the process of implementing a
Congressional requirement to conduct pilot tests. Results of these
pilots are not yet available. Greece continues to make progress
towards inclusion in the VWP; Greece recently signed an MOU, and a
DHS-led VWP review team traveled to Greece the week of July 6.

22. (SBU) The U.S. noted that progress in the Congress on the
Travel Promotion Act (TPA) bill has slowed down, but the bill is not
dead. The U.S. understood the concerns of the EU with the bill's
provision that would introduce a fee on ESTA, but urged that the EU
keep the TPA and ESTA as separate and distinct issues. ESTA, as
even the EU had concluded, is not tantamount to a U.S. visa; the
lack of a fee is just one aspect of that.

23. (SBU) The U.S. announced continued progress regarding exchanges
of letters with the original (pre-2008) VWP countries. The goal is
to have the required information sharing agreements completed with
all VWP members before they are scheduled to undergo periodic
reviews. The EU announced that its next visa reciprocity report
would be prepared in September.

24. (U) The EU restated its concern that travelers with HIV are
ineligible under the VWP but acknowledged its understanding that the
Department of Health and Human Services is responsible for the
necessary rulemaking to bring U.S. law and regulations on HIV into
conformity.

25. (U) The EU briefly discussed its global approach to migration,
which it dubbed a comprehensive approach. The Swedish Presidency
addressed growing synergies between development and migration policy
and looks to the Athens meeting of the UN Global Forum on Migration
as an opportunity for Europe and the U.S. to cooperate. The State
Department's Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration would
represent the U.S. at the next global forum on migration.
Border management
--------------

26. (SBU) The U.S. expressed its desire to begin implementation of
the U.S.-Frontex working arrangement, noting that a delegation led
by Frontex Executive Director Ilka Laitinen will visit Washington in
August.
U.S.-EU JHA Troika Ministerial
--------------

27. (SBU) The EU asked the U.S. to confirm the proposed dates of
October 27 and 28 for the U.S.-EU JHA Troika Ministerial meeting in
Washington. Delegations discussed a list of potential topics for the
Ministerial, including the declaration on transatlantic relations,
the U.S.-EU extradition and mutual legal assistance agreements, VWP,
data protection, reports on various seminars, counterterrorism,
update on Guantanamo closing, trafficking in persons, update on the
EU Stockholm Program, international cooperation, cybercrime, and
corruption.

28. (U) This message was drafted by members of the U.S. delegation
in association with Embassy Stockholm staff.
SILVERMAN