Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE69225
2009-07-02 22:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

DISCOURAGE BORROWING TO MEET INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

Tags:  AORC IAEA PREL UN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0007
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #9225 1832258
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 022235Z JUL 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA IMMEDIATE 0000
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 069225 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/23/2036
TAGS: AORC IAEA PREL UN
SUBJECT: DISCOURAGE BORROWING TO MEET INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

REF: A. UNVIE 279

B. STATE 057105

Classified By: A/S ESTHER BRIMMER for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 069225

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/23/2036
TAGS: AORC IAEA PREL UN
SUBJECT: DISCOURAGE BORROWING TO MEET INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

REF: A. UNVIE 279

B. STATE 057105

Classified By: A/S ESTHER BRIMMER for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) This is an action request in response to reftel
request for guidance. Please see paragraph 2.


2. (C) Summary and Action Request: Mission should
discourage any proposal that interest-bearing loans be used
to meet International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
infrastructure needs and continue to work with member states
to advance the U.S. position for a significant budget
increase. Mission should emphasize that borrowing proposals
are merely short- term, stopgap solutions, and that real
budget increases are required to solve these problems in a
sustainable way. The Department views external &borrowing8
as an ineffective method of financing IAEA infrastructure
projects, while internal &borrowing8 has little chance of
achieving widespread support, especially among the NAM and
G-77 member states. Department finds the option of
interest-bearing external loans unacceptable. An
interest-free external loan from host country Austria, while
not preferred, might be acceptable if passed as a consensus
measure with broad support. An internal loan, such as
borrowing from the Technical Cooperation Fund, should not be
pursued unless it receives broad support, as this would be
only a short-term fix and would likely alienate G-77 member
countries. End Summary.

Background
--------------


3. (SBU) The U.S. has been arguing for an increase in the
IAEA budget, consistent with the President,s pledge, in
order to enhance nuclear safeguards, security, and safety.
Our support for a substantial increase in the regular budget
has faced resistance from many of our European allies and
developing countries. Though some consensus exists on the
importance of the IAEA re-examining its budget to meet
infrastructure needs, including the IAEA Safeguards
Analytical Laboratory (SAL) at Seibersdorf, Austria, there is
little consensus on how these needs should be addressed.


4. (SBU) Canada, France, Germany and the UK have supported
the concept of &borrowing8 as a way to fund both the SAL
and other infrastructure upgrades. This proposal has also
gathered increasing support from G-77 countries. There are

three specific options for borrowing: external borrowing
through interest-bearing loans, external borrowing through
interest-free loans, and internal borrowing (likely from the
Agency,s Technical Cooperation fund).

Interest-Bearing Loan
--------------

5. (C) An interest-bearing loan is not an acceptable
proposal to meet IAEA infrastructure needs. Interest-bearing
loans conflict with U.S. policy to increase the IAEA budget.
President Obama has committed to providing the IAEA with the
resources it needs to perform its duties as a nuclear
watchdog. Approving an interest-bearing loan would undercut
the U.S. position in support of a 9.5% increase in the IAEA
regular budget and would not solve IAEA,s long-term budget
situation. Mission can also emphasize the lack of precedent
in international organizations for an interest-bearing loan,
as each of the cited examples in para 6 below (UNESCO, WHO,
WTO) were granted interest-free loans.

Interest-Free Loan
--------------

6. (C) An interest-free loan is not preferred as a solution
to the IAEA budget woes, but could be acceptable if it
achieves broad consensus. Interest-free loans have been
employed in the past in the cases of UNESCO, WTO, and WHO. In
each of these instances, the organizations in question
requested and received interest-free loans from or guaranteed
by their host countries to build or upgrade their
administrative headquarters. If the U.S. were to accept an
interest free loan for the IAEA, it would only be to fund
infrastructure upgrades at the SAL and other locations in
Austria, and even then only if it obtains broad support among
member states.


7. (C) An interest-free loan would also face obstacles from
the Austrian government. Austrian Mission Counselor Stefan
Heisler implied to Member States that Austria would be
disinclined to offer or guarantee such a loan. While Austrian
disinclination reinforces the U.S. opposition to all
&borrowing,8 it could leave open and even advance the
proposal for interest-bearing loans, which is unacceptable to
the U.S. If interest-free loans are ruled out (because of
Austrian objections),member states that see borrowing as a
panacea would likely turn to interest-bearing loans. Mission
should emphasize that even an interest-free loan is
problematic and would not be a solution to IAEA budget woes.
The Agency will need increased funds in the future, and such
a loan would only be a short-term solution needed to fund key
infrastructure upgrades.

Internal Borrowing
--------------

8. (C) Internal borrowing would be acceptable to the U.S. to
meet IAEA budget concerns, though not ideal. The only fund
from which internal borrowing could take place would be the
Technical Cooperation Fund (TCF). The TCF contains reserves
of over $80 million, and such a loan would have little impact
on TC operations. Borrowing from the TC fund is likely
politically unfeasible due to probable strong G-77
opposition, despite its attractiveness as a short term
solution. Mission should not push internal borrowing from TCF
as a solution to budget woes, unless it receives widespread
support among Member States, as it would be only a temporary
solution and could alienate G-77 countries.

Conclusion
--------------

9. (C) Borrowing is not a solution to IAEA budget issues.
Mission should continue to advance the U.S. position
supporting a significant IAEA budget increase. External
interest-bearing loans are unacceptable. While external
interest-free loans are not ideal, they could potentially be
acceptable as a consensus measure. Internal loans could meet
immediate financial needs of the Agency, but they would
likely alienate G-77 countries and should not be a focus of
Mission,s budget efforts. Mission should emphasize that
borrowing only delays the inevitable budget increases and, in
the case of interest-bearing loans, would actually increase
future budget commitments.


10. (SBU) Mission is requested to advise Department on
developments regarding IAEA budget issues, especially efforts
to borrow to meet infrastructure needs.
CLINTON