Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE55545
2009-05-29 22:44:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

COPUOS: GUIDANCE FOR 52ND SESSION OF UN COMMITTEE

Tags:  TSPA UNPUOS UNGA PARM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6426
RR RUEHSK
DE RUEHC #5545/01 1492259
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 292244Z MAY 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 4996
INFO DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1497
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 2997
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 3925
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 6749
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 4493
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0714
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 5259
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 4657
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 0919
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0860
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 9172
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6322
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 7287
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 STATE 055545 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
GENEVA FOR CD DELEGATION

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA UNPUOS UNGA PARM
SUBJECT: COPUOS: GUIDANCE FOR 52ND SESSION OF UN COMMITTEE
ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE, JUNE 3-12, 2009

REF: A. STATE 11917

B. STATE 28279

C. UNVIE 103

D. UNVIE 225

E. STATE 12948

F. MOSCOW 556

G. STATE 2007

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 STATE 055545

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
GENEVA FOR CD DELEGATION

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA UNPUOS UNGA PARM
SUBJECT: COPUOS: GUIDANCE FOR 52ND SESSION OF UN COMMITTEE
ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE, JUNE 3-12, 2009

REF: A. STATE 11917

B. STATE 28279

C. UNVIE 103

D. UNVIE 225

E. STATE 12948

F. MOSCOW 556

G. STATE 2007


1. Following is guidance for the 52nd session of the UN
Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS). This
guidance will focus on matters that require specific action
by the Committee. USDEL should draw on detailed guidance in
ref A (Scientific and Technical Subcommittee) and ref B
(Legal Subcommittee) for other issues relating to the work of
the subcommittees.


2. General Overview: The 2009 sessions of the Scientific and
Technical and Legal Subcommittees were successful from the
U.S. perspective. The U.S. has made progress in reaching
agreement on vital UN reforms giving us the opportunity to
provide solid leadership on a range of issues in the UN
system. U.S. activity in space, both governmental and
commercial, is governed by international and domestic laws
and regulations, which have contributed to the orderly use of
space by all nations. As interest in and use of space
increases, we must participate actively in shaping the space
legal and regulatory environment. This is as true for COPUOS
and its subcommittees as any other UN body. Additionally, we
are well positioned because of the results of Unispace III
that reflect, for the most part, more achievable
recommendations than previous Unispace reports and support a
number of USG priorities in international space cooperation.
COPUOS members will continue to draw upon the July 19-30,
1999 Unispace III report and the recent report to the UNGA
on progress achieved in implementing the recommendations of
Unispace III (a/59/174) in formulating proposals for new
agenda items and other COPUOS-sponsored activities. USDEL
should take advantage of opportunities to show linkage
between USG space activities and themes in these reports.


3. Collision of Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2215 satellites:

Refs C, D, E and F contain information concerning the
collision of Iridium 33 and Russia's Cosmos 2251 satellites,
notifications provided by USDELs at the STSC and LSC, and
subsequent exchanges of information with the Russian
Federation. At this session, USDEL will provide an update on

the debris field resulting from the collision and Brigadier
General Susan Helms, Director, Plans and Policy, J-5, United
States Strategic Command, will present a briefing on the
Iridium-COSMOS satellite collision. In addition, USDEL may
use the following points as necessary:

--The incident highlights the limitations of and risk
inherent in the current practices and capabilities of
satellite operators and the space surveillance community.

--However, the incident illustrates the risks arising from
the increasing number of objects in space and the critical
need to minimize space debris.

--The incident also highlights the critical need to minimize
space debris.

--In addition, this incident serves as a reminder of the
importance of the long-standing principle of cooperation and
mutual assistance in the exploration and use of outer space.

--This incident also can serve as an impetus to increase
bilateral and multilateral Transparency and Confidence
Building Measures (TCBMs) relating to space activities.


STATE 00055545 002 OF 006


--The U.S. is currently improving our space situational
awareness by increasing our capability to conduct analysis on
the 800 active maneuvering satellites.

--The USDEL may describe other ways the USG is working to
improve U.S. space situational awareness capabilities drawing
upon relevant interagency-cleared statements, as appropriate.

-- The U.S. has already received technical information from
Russia on this event, which served as a useful contribution
to the U.S. review.

-- The U.S. also intends to engage with government and
private sector satellite operators to increase cooperation
and information sharing.

-- The U.S. continues to support discussions on pragmatic
proposals to ensure the long-term sustainability of the space
environment.


4. Arms Control: The issue of space arms control may be a
major issue given the new U.S. Administration. If this
occurs, USDEL should stress that COPUOS is concerned
exclusively with international cooperation in the peaceful
uses of outer space, as indicated by its title. The first
committee of the UNGA (Disarmament and International
Security) and the CD would be the more appropriate
multilateral fora to discuss arms control matters related to
outer space. Our objective in COPUOS and its subcommittees
is to underscore the unprecedented international space
cooperation now underway and reinforce opposition to calls in
the CD for arms control negotiations on outer space. USDEL
may draw on the following:

-- There is unprecedented international cooperation in space.

-- The lawful national security uses of space have broad
benefits for the international community and enhance
international peace and security. Examples include treaty
compliance/ monitoring, communications, environmental
monitoring, GPS, refugee tracking, counterterrorism, and
sanctions enforcement.

-- If the USDEL is pressed about the Administration's
statement on the White House Defense web site regarding a
worldwide ban on weapons that interfere with military and
commercial satellites (see note below for exact statement),
the USDEL should state that the Obama administration is
conducting a comprehensive review of national space policies
(NOTE- The statement is not/not on an updated version of the
White House site). If further pressed regarding continuity
in U.S. space policy, USDEL may also note that:

--- it is a part of long-standing U.S. space policy that the
United States will maintain and strengthen the established
principle of free access to, and use of, outer space for
peaceful purposes by all nations in support of legitimate
economic and security interests.

--- as space becomes an increasingly congested and complex
domain, the U.S. intends to take an active leadership role in
identifying and implementing cooperative efforts with
established and emerging members of the international
space-faring community to ensure the safety of the space
assets of all nations.

--- building upon recent progress at the United Nations on
international guidelines for orbital debris mitigation, the
United States intends to sustain its global leadership in
spaceflight safety and in the formulation of practical
guidelines to preserve the space environment for future
generations. (NOTE: From January 20, 2009 to approximately
April 29, 2009, the statement at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/defense previously read:
"build defense capabilities for the 21st century; ensure
freedom of space: the Obama-Biden administration will restore
American leadership on space issues, seeking a worldwide ban

STATE 00055545 003 OF 006


on weapons that interfere with military and commercial
satellites. They will thoroughly assess possible threats to
U.S. space assets and the best options, military and
diplomatic, for countering them, establishing contingency
plans to ensure that U.S. forces can maintain or duplicate
access to information from space assets and accelerating
programs to harden U.S. satellites against attack." As of
April 30, 2009, the "defense issues" page at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/defense/ reads: "the full
spectrum of U.S. military capabilities depends on our space
systems. To maintain our technological edge and protect
assets in this domain, we will continue to invest in
next-generation capabilities such as operationally responsive
space and global positioning systems. We will cooperate with
our allies and the private sector to identify and protect
against intentional and unintentional threats to U.S. and
allied space capabilities.")


5. Outer space "Code of Conduct": The issue of proposals for
an outer space "Code of Conduct" will probably not be a major
issue, but some delegations may seek clarification of the new
administration's position. These requests for clarification
may note a drafting project for a "Code of Conduct for Outer
Space Activities" that was endorsed in December 2008 by the
council of the European Union (ref G). If raised, the USDEL
may draw upon the following points as necessary:

-- The United States intends to play a leading role in
advancing transparency and confidence building measures
(TCBMs) relating to space activities. Such TCBMs can help
increase transparency regarding governmental space policies,
strategies and potentially hazardous activities. This can
help to reduce uncertainty over intentions and decrease the
risk of misinterpretation or miscalculation in a crisis.

-- In this regard, the administration intends to continue to
work closely with our friends and allies in Europe and
elsewhere to develop voluntary TCBMs that all space-faring
nations can support and actively participate in for the
benefit of all nations.

-- Any international effort to develop TCBMs should
complement, and not unnecessarily duplicate, the work of the
COPUOS.

-- It is important that the United States work closely with
its allies to implement the diplomatic or military measures
that may be necessary both to ensure the continued operation
(and responsible use) of military, intelligence, civil, and
commercial satellites and to respond appropriately if these
satellites are targeted in a hostile manner.


6. Military Space Activities: The nature and conduct of
U.S. military space activities will probably not be a major
issue. However, some delegations may raise various U.S.
military activities as a tactical device to undercut U.S.
efforts to promote general and universal principles for
spaceflight safety. If raised, USDEL may draw on following
points, as necessary:

-- The lawful military uses of space have broad benefits for
the international community and enhance international peace
and security. Some examples include treaty
compliance/monitoring, communications, environmental
monitoring, GPS, refugee tracking, counterterrorism, and
sanctions enforcement.

-- The United States is committed to the principle that all
spaceflight operations should be conducted in a safe and
responsible manner that protects humans in space as well as
robotic space systems and their mission.

-- To maintain our technological edge and protect assets in
the space domain, we will continue to invest in
next-generation capabilities such as operationally responsive
space and global positioning systems. We will cooperate with
our allies and the private sector to identify and protect

STATE 00055545 004 OF 006


against intentional and unintentional threats to U.S. and
allied space capabilities.

--- (if asked) the U.S. commitment to safety and
transparency was exhibited in last year's engagement of the
disabled USA-193 satellite.


7. Report of the Legal Subcommittee: Ref B contains
additional guidance. The 2009 session of the LSC produced
some useful results and was notable for a number of positive
developments that bode well future USG interests. Among
these were (1) the absence of any sustained effort to
introduce matters concerning space arms control; (2) the
participation of governmental and non-governmental legal
experts; and (3) the substantive discussion of national
mechanisms for orbital debris mitigation and national
legislation relevant to the peaceful use of outer space.

8. Space Based Geospatial Data for Sustainable Development:
For several years, Brazil had sought to revisit the 1986
principles on remote sensing from space in the Legal
Subcommittee. During the 2006 session of the LSC, Brazil
instead proposed that the Subcommittee consider the question
of cooperation in promoting the use of geospatial data for
sustainable development. The Committee agreed to a multiyear
work plan for a new item entitled "International Cooperation
in Promoting the Use of Space-Derived Geospatial Data for
Sustainable Development. This is the last year of the work
plan. At this session the committee will review the use of
geospatial data within the UN system and consider ways to
foster international cooperation to build up national use of
space-derived geospatial data for sustainable development.

9. Best Practices for Safe Space Operations: At the 50th
Session of the full COPUOS, Chairman Brachet presented a
comprehensive assessment of the future activities of COPUOS
entitled, "Future Roles and Activities of the Committee on
the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space." Brachet believes that
COPUOS needs to play a role in shaping the international
standards for space activities and in promoting international
cooperation in areas such as research, applications,
operations, and exploration. He believes that COPUOS should
also look at the longer term issues facing the future
peaceful uses of outer space and identify where the committee
can best contribute to the sustainability of space activities
and to their future progress for the benefit of all.


10. Long-Term Sustainability of Space Activities: Chairman
Brachet's assessment of the sustainability of space
activities specifically noted the excellent work done by the
STSC in the development of voluntary debris mitigation
guidelines. The assessment noted the larger numbers of space
actors and suggested that it is imperative to agree on "Rules
of the Road" to avoid interference, collisions, and other
mishaps, particularly by newcomers to space operations.
Brachet is not suggesting that there is a need to modify the
present treaty regime, but rather to develop recommendations
to deal with the new realities of space operations. To
further this concept, the government of France hosted an
informal consultation group that met twice in 2008 and once
in 2009 to produce, in collaboration with relevant
intergovernmental organizations and representatives of the
private sector, a technical assessment of the situation and
potential future work in this area for COPUOS. The United
States participated in all the meetings of the informal
consultations and is a member of the drafting group
established through these consultations to document the
results. The consultations included a cross-section of COPUOS
member states, international organizations, and commercial
space operators. Those participating in the meetings agreed
to continue the exchange of relevant views on this subject
with the objective of drafting an outline document that could
guide further work in this area by the STSC, no earlier than

2010. Brachet intends to have a fourth meeting of the
informal working group to review the draft report.

At the last session of the STSC, France introduced a
proposal to add to the agenda of the Subcommittee an item, to
be considered under a multi-year work plan, entitled &Long

STATE 00055545 005 OF 006


Term Sustainability of Space Activities.8 Although it was
not possible to reach consensus at that time, the
Subcommittee agreed that the topic was important and that the
proposal would be submitted for a decision by the committee
at this session pending results of informal consultations
among member states. The proposal as drafted is acceptable to
the United States and the USDEL should join consensus.

In the course of considering the French proposal, the USDEL
should make the following points to ensure that the future
work of the informal consultations and any proposal to the
STSC is properly framed.

(a) Future work should address best practices associated
with space operations, procedures, and policies from
pre-launch through end-of-life activities (NOTE: These
efforts should take into account, but not duplicate or
reopen, the activities and recommendations being undertaken
in the STSC working group on Nuclear Power Sources in space
and the work of the STSC and IADC on orbital debris
mitigation.).

(b) The future work should involve input from state
members, space-faring nation representatives, commercial
space operators and providers on their best practices
associated with safe space operations, procedures, and
policies.

(c) Future work could include the preparation of a
consolidated list of best practices associated with safe
space operations.

(d) For Future Reference: In the event that it is agreed at
a future COPUOS that the STSC would develop voluntary safe
space operation guidelines, those guidelines should:

(i) be no more stringent than the associated existing USG
policies, principles, procedures, regulations, standard
practices, and guidelines;

(ii) remain voluntary for every state responsible for space
activities and not be legally binding under international law;

(iii) not provide specific or additional penalties for
failing to follow the guidelines, beyond those already
provided under international law;

(iv) ensure that each proposed guideline maintains or
improves the safety of spaceflight operations and protects
the space environment without imposing unacceptable or
unreasonable costs; and

(v) be consistent with the activities and recommendations
of the STSC working group on Nuclear Power Sources in space,
the work and recommendations of the IADC and the STSC
concerning orbital debris mitigation and the COPUOS
guidelines on orbital debris mitigation.

(e) any work of the STSC would not address the current
outer space legal regime or any legal questions/issues. The
USG position remains that:

(i) The 1967 Outer Space Treaty, 1968 Rescue and Return
Agreement, the 1972 Liability Convention, and the 1975
Registration Convention should be adopted and fully adhered
to by all nations;

(ii) the principles established in these agreements have
stood the test of time because they created the fundamental
guidelines required for the free access to, and use of, outer
space for peaceful purposes; and,

(iii) these agreements form the legal basis for all outer
space operations.


11. For Future Consideration: The International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO),International

STATE 00055545 006 OF 006


Telecommunications Union (ITU),European Space Agency (ESA),
and European Organization for the exploitation of
meteorological satellites (EUMETSAT),Consultative Committee
for Space Data Systems (CCSDS),and International
organization for standardization (ISO) could be invited to
send experts with relevant expertise in space operations to
participate as observers in the informal consultations and
future work of the STSC.

(a) An invitation to the ITU could emphasize the
intergovernmental organization's possible contributions in
providing information concerning the ITU's processes for
coordinating use by geostationary satellites of radio
frequencies and associated orbital locations.

(b) Invitations to ESA and EUMETSAT should note their
respective roles as leading international intergovernmental
organizations that have declared acceptance of rights and
obligations under the liability agreement and the
registration convention. They are both permanent observers in
COPUOS.

(c) Invitations to CCSDS and ISO should not these
organizations, activities in the development of common
standards for space operations and data exchange.


12. Freedom of Action in Outer Space: The USG will oppose
attempts at COPUOS to limit USG freedom of action in outer
space and or to establish general prohibitions on legitimate
U.S. peaceful space activities conducted in pursuit of
national interests.


13. Space Object Tracking: The USG intends to continue to
voluntarily offer its unclassified space object tracking
data, free of charge, to nations as well as commercial
operators and civil society.

14, Finally, the U.S. Delegation reaffirms that the United
States;

-- remains open about the basic principles of its national
space policies;

-- reaffirms its commitment to the principle of free access
to and use of space by all/all nations for peaceful purposes;

-- continues to seek international cooperation with other
nations in the peaceful uses of outer space;

-- remains ready to work with other nations to extend the
benefits of space, to enhance space exploration, and to use
space to protect and promote freedom around the world;
and,

-- requests that other nations demonstrate similar
transparency regarding their own space policies, procedures,
activities and intentions in outer space.
CLINTON