Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE44644
2009-05-01 19:32:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT): RESPONSE

Tags:  KNNP AORC ENRG MNUC PARM PREL CDG UNGA IAEA NPT UP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #4644 1211951
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 011932Z MAY 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0000
INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 0000
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0000
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0000
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0000
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0000
UNCLAS STATE 044644 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP AORC ENRG MNUC PARM PREL CDG UNGA IAEA NPT UP
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT): RESPONSE
TO UKRAINIAN NON-PAPERS

REF: A. A) STATE 40237

B. B) STATE 06970

UNCLAS STATE 044644

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP AORC ENRG MNUC PARM PREL CDG UNGA IAEA NPT UP
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT): RESPONSE
TO UKRAINIAN NON-PAPERS

REF: A. A) STATE 40237

B. B) STATE 06970


1. (U) This is an action message; see paragraph 3 below.


2. (U) SUMMARY: Ref A requested relevant reporting from host
governments most likely to influence the outcome of critical
upcoming NPT meetings. Ukraine responded (ref B) with a
non-paper titled &Sharing Informal Views on the NPT:
Ukrainian viewpoint,8 that laid out Ukraine's position and
built on a related working paper that the GOU submitted
during the 2008 PrepCom ("Preparing for a Successful Review
Conference 2010"). Department requests Embassy to make the
points in para three below to appropriate MFA officials. END
SUMMARY

--------------
Action Request
--------------

3. (U) Embassy should reply to Ukrainian officials, drawing
on the following points, which may be left as a non-paper:

Begin text:
-- As President Obama stated in Prague on April 5,
strengthening the NPT will be one of the Administration's top
priorities over the next few years.
-- We are encouraged by your February non-paper on
Ukraine's views and priorities in the NPT review process.
Your views largely accord with ours.
-- It is clear that Parties should seek procedural success
at the 2009 PrepCom and substantive success at the 2010
RevCon.
-- The United States will demonstrate further progress on
fulfilling our disarmament-related obligations under Article
VI and will be taking concrete steps, such as working to
ratify the CTBT, beginning negotiations on a verifiable FMCT,
and negotiating with Russia to follow on the START treaty
before the end of 2009.
-- We want to work with Ukraine and other NPT Parties to
encourage the universalization of the NPT and full compliance
with its obligations, while discouraging countries from
violating, and then withdrawing from, the Treaty.
-- Our two governments understand that solving issues such
as noncompliance by Iran, North Korea and Syria will require
concerted, consistent, multilateral diplomacy.
-- We both believe in the fundamental importance of IAEA
safeguards and will work towards the universalization of the
Additional Protocol.
-- We both acknowledge the existential danger of nuclear
terrorism to our countries and the United States hopes to
continue to work with other states to increase the security
of nuclear materials world-wide. To this end, President
Obama has committed to host a Global Summit on Nuclear
Security within the next year.
-- We also share with Ukraine the belief that
international fuel banks could be an excellent solution to
the challenge of sharing in the benefits of nuclear
technology without increasing the risks of proliferation.
-- On other points raised in your non-paper, we are still
formulating our policies. As you may know, Congress has
required that the U.S. Government review its nuclear weapons
policies as part of a Nuclear Posture Review, due later this
year. The results of this review will help us address many
additional nuclear weapon issues.
-- The President has made clear that the United States is
committed to bringing about a world free of nuclear weapons.
We look forward to cooperating closely with Ukraine
throughout the NPT review process to the end.
End text


4. (SBU) NOTE FOR EMBASSY KYIV: There are some issues
contained in the Ukrainian NPT non-paper that relate to START
and a START follow-on agreement that will be addressed
separately.

In addition, Ukraine's non-paper supports several positions
that the United States cannot support, in part or in full.
These include:
-- Changes in U.S. nuclear weapons policy, to include
de-alerting, withdrawal to storage, and formalized reporting
of nuclear weapons deployments and force levels;
-- Negotiation of a legally binding negative security
assurances treaty; and
-- Establishment of a permanent NPT secretariat to support
meetings and of a standing bureau to monitor compliance.
Embassy should refer MFA interlocutors, specific concerns
regarding these policies to Washington.


5. (U) Questions regarding this message may be directed to
Scott Davis (ISN/MNSA),who can be reached at
davisms@state.sgov.gov, davisms@state.gov, or 1-202-647-1141.
Please slug reply for the Department (ISN/MNSA),Geneva
(CD),and USUN (POL).
CLINTON