Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE44254
2009-04-30 23:54:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE REQUEST: URGE POSTS TO REMOVE TRADE

Tags:  EAGR ETRD ECON 
pdf how-to read a cable
UNCLASSIFIED STATE 00044254 
VZCZCXRO3933
RR RUEHAG RUEHAO RUEHAP RUEHAST RUEHAT RUEHBC RUEHBI RUEHBL RUEHBZ
RUEHCD RUEHCHI RUEHCI RUEHCN RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDE RUEHDF RUEHDH
RUEHDT RUEHDU RUEHED RUEHEL RUEHFK RUEHFL RUEHGA RUEHGD RUEHGH RUEHGI
RUEHGR RUEHHA RUEHHM RUEHHO RUEHHT RUEHIHL RUEHIK RUEHJS RUEHKN RUEHKR
RUEHKSO RUEHKUK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLH RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHMA RUEHMC
RUEHMJ RUEHMR RUEHMRE RUEHMT RUEHNAG RUEHNG RUEHNH RUEHNL RUEHNP
RUEHNZ RUEHPA RUEHPB RUEHPD RUEHPOD RUEHPT RUEHPW RUEHQU RUEHRD RUEHRG
RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHRS RUEHSK RUEHTM RUEHTRO RUEHVC RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHC #4254/01 1210013
ZNR UUUUU ZZH

R 302354Z APR 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO ALL DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI 7070
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 STATE 044254 

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ETRD ECON

SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST: URGE POSTS TO REMOVE TRADE
BANS ON PORK DUE TO H1N1 FEARS

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 STATE 044254

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ETRD ECON

SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST: URGE POSTS TO REMOVE TRADE
BANS ON PORK DUE TO H1N1 FEARS


1. For posts listed in paragraphs 6 and 7, this is an
action request; other posts are encouraged to draw on
these points if appropriate. Given the growing
sensitivity on this issue, however, posts are requested
to use discretion in discussing these points with
countries that have not enacted restrictions on U.S.
pork products in order to avoid adding to already
heightened concerns.

SUMMARY


2. At least twelve countries have put in place either
partial or complete bans on U.S. pork because of fears
related to the H1N1 outbreak currently occurring in the
United States, Mexico, and other parts of the world. We
are aware of an additional eight countries that are
considering a ban. As appropriate, Post may discuss a
coordinated approach in-country with other foreign
missions, particularly with the Mexican, Canadian, and
European Community missions. The World Organization for
Animal Health, commonly referred to by its French
acronym as the OIE, is the standard setting body for
trade in meat and animal products. The OIE issued
statements on April 27 and 28 indicating that there is
no risk from the consumption of fully cooked pork, and
urging countries to refrain from interrupting trade
flows. The Centers for Disease Control, along with
other international experts, agree that there is no risk
from eating properly handled and cooked pork.

OBJECTIVES


3. The intent of this cable is to urge governments
which have implemented trade bans to reduce or eliminate
those trade bans. Posts may also use these points to
reassure governments that U.S. pork is safe. Posts that
feel that governments may impose new trade bans may also
use these points as appropriate.

DISEASE NAME


4. Initial reports calling this disease the "Swine Flu"
resulted in confusion that triggered many of these trade
bans. Therefore, the USG has determined that to
minimize such confusion going forward, the term "H1N1
influenza" should be used. (Note: President Obama used
this terminology in his April 29 press conference.) We
do not support any attempt to have this disease termed
the "Mexican Flu" or the "North American Flu."

SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


5. Most international organizations and U.S. Government
Agencies with an interest in animal or human health now
have web sites devoted to news and advice related to the

H1N1 outbreak. You may provide the following
information to those seeking information.

- World Organization for Animal Health/OIE:
http://www.oie.int/eng/press/en_090428.htm World
Health Organization: www.who.int/en

- Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN:
www.fao.org

- U.S. Center for disease control: www.cdc.gov

- U.S. Health and Human Services: www.hhs.gov

ACTION REQUEST


6. For Astana, Manila, Quito, Amman, Bishkek, Beirut,
Kuala Lumpur only:

At the highest appropriate level, Post should inquire if
Ministries of Agriculture and/or Ministries of Trade can
confirm a trade ban using the following point, and
provide other related information as appropriate:

- We understand that your Government is considering
implementing a ban on U.S. pork because of fears
related to the cases of H1N1 in the United States.
We would urge your government to reconsider such
action.


7. For Action Moscow, Beijing, Zagreb, Santo Domingo,
Tegucigalpa, Jakarta, Belgrade, Seoul, Castries,
Bangkok, Abu Dhabi, Kiev, and any other posts with
confirmed bans:

At the highest appropriate level, Post should deliver
the following points to Ministries of Agriculture and/or
Ministries of Trade:

- The World Health Organization (WHO) clearly stated
on April 30 that "There is also no risk of
infection from this virus from consumption of well-
cooked pork and pork products. Individuals are
advised to wash hands thoroughly with soap and
water on a regular basis and should seek medical
attention if they develop any symptoms of
influenza-like illness." The World Animal Health
Organization, commonly referred to by its French
acronym as the OIE, has likewise stated there is no
need for trade bans.

- As always, safe steps in food handling, cooking,
and storage are essential to prevent food-borne
illness.

- There have been no reports of the 2009 H1N1
influenza occurring in swine in the United States.
A network of federal veterinarians, state animal
health officials, and private practitioners are
regularly involved with monitoring U.S. swine for
signs of significant disease. To date, there have
been no reports that the influenza virus currently
causing illness in humans is circulating anywhere
in the U.S. swine herd. As a proactive measure,
USDA is reaching out to all state animal health
officials to affirm they have no signs of this
virus type in their state. In addition, USDA has
put U.S. pork producers on high alert to look for
evidence of disease.

- The World Organization for Animal Health, commonly
referred to by its French acronym as the OIE, is
the standard setting body for the trade in animals
and meat products. Their April 28 and April 30
statements are clear; "Currently, only findings
related to the circulation of this virus in pigs in
zones of countries having human cases would justify
trade measures on the importation of pigs from
these countries." "Scientific evidence currently
available to the OIE and partner organizations
indicates that this novel A/H1N1 virus is being
transmitted amongst humans; there is no evidence of
infection in pigs, nor of humans acquiring
infection directly from pigs". According to these
experts, there is no justification for trade
restrictions on U.S.-origin pigs, pork, or pork
products, as this virus has not been isolated or
reported in swine.

- Any disruption to trade, both of live animals and
meat products, further exacerbates the global fears
of increasing protectionism in trade. We would
urge your government to consider whether there is a
valid, sound scientific justification for
maintaining these restrictions.


8. All other posts may draw on the talking points and
other information referenced above in responding to
inquiries from the host governments.


9. Please provide front channel response by May 8 with
host government response to Ann Ryan EEB/TPP/MTAA/ABT,
and slugged to Jane Doherty, USTR, and Clay Hamilton and
Casey Bean, USDA/OSTA.


10. Minimize considered.
CLINTON