Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE2007
2009-01-08 21:50:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

U.S. COMMENTS ON EU COUNCIL'S DRAFT "CODE OF

Tags:  CDG EC ESA EUN EZ FR KACT KTIA MCAP PARM PREL TSPA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2652
OO RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHC #2007/01 0082205
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O R 082150Z JAN 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE IMMEDIATE 9380
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 8992
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1577
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 3536
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 2434
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 9138
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 7420
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 5407
INFO DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE
EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4447
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 4323
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 STATE 002007 

SIPDIS
GENEVA FOR CD DEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/08/2019
TAGS: CDG EC ESA EUN EZ FR KACT KTIA MCAP PARM PREL TSPA
UK
SUBJECT: U.S. COMMENTS ON EU COUNCIL'S DRAFT "CODE OF
CONDUCT FOR OUTER SPACE ACTIVITIES"

REF: (A) 07 LISBON 002604 (B) 07 STATE 157671

Classified By: PAMcNerney, Reasons 1.4 (a),(d),(e),and (g)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 STATE 002007

SIPDIS
GENEVA FOR CD DEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/08/2019
TAGS: CDG EC ESA EUN EZ FR KACT KTIA MCAP PARM PREL TSPA
UK
SUBJECT: U.S. COMMENTS ON EU COUNCIL'S DRAFT "CODE OF
CONDUCT FOR OUTER SPACE ACTIVITIES"

REF: (A) 07 LISBON 002604 (B) 07 STATE 157671

Classified By: PAMcNerney, Reasons 1.4 (a),(d),(e),and (g)


1. (SBU) THIS IS AN ACTION REQUEST. See paragraph 3 below.


2. (C) BACKGROUND: On December 8, 2008, the European Union
(EU) Foreign Ministers endorsed a draft proposal for a "Code
of Conduct for Outer Space Activities"
(http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/0 8/st17/st17175.
en08.pdf). In approving this draft package of voluntary
transparency and confidence building measures, in which
Subscribing States would participate on a voluntary basis,
the Council called for consultations "with key third
countries that have activities in outer space or have
interests in outer space activities, with the aim of reaching
a text that is acceptable to the greatest number of
countries."

(C) In a November 27, 2008, letter to Acting Under Secretary
of State for Arms Control and International Security John C.
Rood, French MFA Director of Strategic Affairs, Security and
Disarmament Jacques Audibert invited the U.S. to provide the
EU with further comments. The French Presidency also
expressed its interest in pursuing further bilateral
consultations on the text "to continue to improve it."

(C) In his letter to U/S Rood, Audibert noted "fruitful"
consultations between the U.S. and EU on two preliminary
versions of the draft code. The U.S. received the first
preliminary draft from the Portuguese Presidency of the EU
Council in October 2007 (REFTEL A). The U.S. provided
"line-in/line-out" comments on this draft in November 2007
(REFTEL B). The Department received a second preliminary
draft of the Code of Conduct from the French Presidency in

July 2008. On September 19, 2008, U.S. and EU experts held
informal consultations in Washington, D.C., during which U.S.
experts clarified several concerns regarding the second
preliminary draft.

(C) In November 2008, reflecting a desire to reach an
expanded consensus, the French Presidency sent advance copies
of the draft approved by the EU Foreign Ministers to eight
countries "with activities in outer space or interests in
outer space," including Canada, Japan, Israel, Brazil, and
India as well as to the U.S., Russia, and China.

(C) EU experts report that the Czech Presidency will continue
developing the draft using inputs provided by the U.S. and
other countries with "activities in outer space or interests
in outer space." The ultimate goal of the EU is to present
the draft Code of Conduct in 2009 to relevant international
fora, including the Conference on Disarmament, the UN
Committee for the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, and the UN
General Assembly. The EU also is considering the possibility
of establishing a stand-alone process for adoption modeled on
the Hague Code of Conduct measures for ballistic missile
proliferation. Acting Under Secretary Rood met with his P-3
counterparts (UK FCO Director General for Defence and
Intelligence Mariot Leslie and French MFA Director of
Strategic Affairs Security and Disarmament Jacques Audibert)
on Thursday, January 8, 2009, and during their discussions on
the EU-proposed Code of Conduct, he provided them a copy of
the U.S. non-paper at paragraph 4.


3. (SBU) Action Request. For Prague: Embassy is requested to
hand over the U.S. non-paper (contained in paragraph 4 below)
to the Czech Presidency of the EU (Mr. Jiri Svoboda, Head of
the Disarmament and Conventional Arms Unit within the MFA,
and/or to other appropriate MFA officials) as soon as
possible. Embassy also should indicate that the U.S.
welcomes further exchanges on this topic with the Czech
Republic and with future EU Presidencies. Post should note

STATE 00002007 002 OF 005

SUBJECT: U.S. COMMENTS ON EU COUNCIL'S DRAFT "CODE OF
CONDUCT FOR OUTER SPACE ACTIVITIE
that the U.S non-paper is marked "For Government Use Only"
and request that the non-paper be handled in the same manner
as "Restreint UE" information.

(SBU) For USEU: USEU is requested to hand over the U.S.
non-paper (contained in paragraph 4 below) to Hlne-Diane
Dage of the European Commission's Space Policy and
Coordination Unit and to Zuzana Sutiakov of the General
Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, or to other
appropriate officials as soon as possible. USEU also should
indicate that the U.S. welcomes further exchanges on this
topic with EU Council Disarmament (CODUN) experts. Post
should note that the U.S. non-paper is marked "For Government
Use Only" and request that the non-paper be handled in the
same manner as "Restreint UE" information.

(SBU) For London and Paris: Embassies are requested to hand
over the U.S. non-paper contained in paragraph 4 to John
Saltford of the UK FCO and to Rosine Couchoud of the French
MFA, or to other appropriate FCO or MFA officials. Embassies
also should indicate that the U.S. welcomes continued close
collaboration within the P-3 as well as at the experts level
on a bilateral basis on approaches to build consensus for
this draft proposal.

(C) For Berlin, Ottawa, Rome, and Tokyo: Embassies are
requested to hand over the U.S. non-paper contained in
paragraph 4 to outer space experts at their Host Nation's
MFAs. Embassies should indicate that this is the U.S.
response to the December 2008 EU's draft "Code of Conduct for
Outer Space Activities," and that the U.S. welcomes
opportunities for discussions on specific points of the
document at future bilateral space security dialogue
discussions conducted at the experts level.

(C) For USDEL to CD: Following hand over to the Czech
Republic, USDEL to the Conference on Disarmament is
authorized to provide courtesy copies of the U.S. non-paper
contained in paragraph 4 to CD Delegations of EU Member
States. USDEL also is authorized to share copies of the
non-paper with non-EU members of the CD Western Group (WEOG),
as well as to Brazil and India.


4. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER:

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

United States Non-Paper
January 7, 2009

-The United States is pleased to respond to the Presidency of
the Council of the European Union's request of November 27,
2008, for further comments on the EU's draft "Code of Conduct
for Outer Space Activities."

-The United States welcomes the opportunity for substantive
discussions on outer space transparency and
confidence-building measures with all established and
emerging spacefaring nations.

-The United States appreciated the opportunity for detailed
and fruitful exchanges with European experts on this
pragmatic and constructive EU initiative. We are pleased to
see that the draft approved on December 8-9, 2008, by the
Council of the European Union (as contained in Council
document 17175/08 of December 17, 2008),reflects a number of
U.S.-recommended inputs.

-Mindful of the Council of the European Union's aim of
reaching a text that is acceptable to the greatest number of
countries, we must note that several problematic elements
still remain in the latest draft. These include three
provisions that would prevent the United States from
subscribing to the December 2008 draft text.

-First, the language in the section on "Notification of Space
Activities" (Section 6.1) of the December 2008 draft calls on
Subscribing States to provide prior notification of
"scheduled maneuvers" or "orbital changes and re-entries, as

STATE 00002007 003 OF 005

SUBJECT: U.S. COMMENTS ON EU COUNCIL'S DRAFT "CODE OF
CONDUCT FOR OUTER SPACE ACTIVITIE
well as other relevant orbital parameters," regardless of any
risk of hazard to another nation's space activities.
--On national security grounds, the U.S. strongly opposes any
such prior notification provision in a Code of Conduct. The
United States believes the implementation of national
spaceflight safety measures ) including collision avoidance
and de-confliction ) is sufficient to ensure that space
activities are conducted in a safe and responsible manner
that is consistent with national security requirements.
--With regard to re-entry notifications, the U.S. believes
any notification regime should be consistent with the
measures outlined in Annex VI "Risk Object Re-entry Data
Exchange" to the Terms of Reference of the Inter-Agency Space
Debris Coordination Committee.
--Therefore, the U.S. recommends that the first and second
bullets in Section 6.1 be revised to read:
---"- scheduled maneuvers or orbital changes, consistent with
the principles of Article IX of the Outer Space Treaty;"
---"- high risk re-entry events, consistent with the risk
object data exchange guidelines of the Inter-Agency Space
Debris Coordination Committee;"

-Second, the United States also strongly objects to language
in the draft text regarding "Measures on Space Operations"
(Section 4.2) that calls on states to refrain from any
intentional action that "will or might bring about, directly
or indirectly, the damage or destruction of outer space
objects8 unless such an action is justified by "imperative
safety considerations" and/or the post-mission disposal of a
Subscribing State's own spacecraft to reduce orbital debris.
--Per the August 2006 U.S. National Space Policy, as well as
U.S. Presidential guidance endorsed for decades, the U.S.
would object to any provisions in a proposed Code of Conduct
that might impair its "freedom of action" in outer space, or
that would impair the rights of the United States to conduct
research, development, testing, and operations or other
activities in space in the pursuit of U.S. national security
interests. In effect, the EU's draft "Code of Conduct" is
attempting to establish an arms control-type constraint ) in
this case a prohibition except under exceptional
circumstances ) on operations in space through a
politically-binding mechanism.
--The U.S. recommends that the first part of Section 4.2 be
revised to read:
---"Subscribing States should, in conducting outer space
activities: -refrain from any intentional action which will,
or is likely to bring about, directly or indirectly, the
damage or destruction of outer space objects unless such
action is conducted to reduce the creation of outer space
debris and/or justified by national security considerations
or imperative public safety considerations;"

-Third, the United States has significant concerns relating
to the draft language on a "consultation mechanism" (Section
9.1). The provision would enable Subscribing States to
pursue creation of a consultative mechanism to discuss the
space-related activities of a Subscribing State for the
purpose of "achieving acceptable solutions regarding measures
to be adopted in order to prevent or minimize the inherent
risks."
--Although the proposed Code of Conduct is only voluntary and
not legally-binding, a lack of clarity in the purpose,
limitations, and criteria for establishing such a
consultative mechanism could create an opportunity for states
to conduct "fishing expeditions" against legitimate U.S. and
allied military and intelligence space activities.
--In order to avoid such a risk, the U.S. strongly recommends
indicating that a "Subscribing State" asking for
consultations should be directly affected by the outer space
activity of specific concern. Such a qualification for the
first Subscribing State requesting consultations would be
consistent with the principle in the EU Draft that other
Subscribing States who desire to participate in the
consultations must "be affected by the risk."
--The U.S. recommends that the first bullet in Section 9.1 be
revised to read:
---"A Subscribing State that is directly affected by certain
outer space activities conducted by one or more Subscribing
State(s) and has reason to believe that those activities are,

STATE 00002007 004 OF 005


-Lastly, the United States has a significant concern related
to the draft language that calls on the Subscribing States
that are involved in this consultative mechanism to "seek
solutions based on an equitable balance of interests."
--The U.S. supports an approach for consultations based upon
international law, including the 1967 Outer Space Treaty,
that would be guided by the principle of resolving concerns
with "due regard to the corresponding interests" of other
spacefaring nations.
--The U.S. recommends that the fourth bullet in Section 9.1
be revised to read:
---"The Subscribing States participating in the consultations
should seek to resolve concerns based upon international
law."

-The United States has a number of additional substantive
concerns outlined below that will require resolution before
the U.S. can support the December 2008 draft text.

-The United States has significant concerns about the
widespread use of language connoting a binding obligation,
such as "shall" and "will," in the proposed non-binding Code
of Conduct. The use of such language in a non-binding
document is contrary to established practice; for example,
the Hague Code of Conduct, which is not binding under
international law, does not use binding language. The United
States would welcome the opportunity to work with the EU to
re-draft the language to reflect properly the non-binding
nature of the proposed Code of Conduct.

-The United States has a substantive concern related to the
draft language on "mechanism to investigate proven incidents
affecting space objects" (Section 9.2).
--The U.S. recommends that Section 9.2 be revised to read, in
its entirety:
---"In addition, the Subscribing States may consider the
desirability and practicability of establishing an
appropriate mechanism for the voluntary resolution of
questions arising from reports of possible acts of harmful
interference with space activities, or other activities
inconsistent with the existing framework regulating outer
space activities, that may be brought by a Subscribing State
with direct economic, civil, or national security interests."
-------------- The recommended language above adapts language from the
2002 Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile
Proliferation (HCOC),to which the United States and European
Union nations have subscribed.

-Additionally, the United States has a substantive concern
regarding its subscription to a Code of Conduct that
specifically calls on a Subscribing State (e.g., the United
States) to reaffirm its commitment to a treaty (i.e., the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty) that is not yet in force for
any state and that the United States does not support
(Section 3.1). Therefore, the U.S. is opposed to any
reference to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
--The United States is an Original Party to the 1963 Treaty
Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer
Space and Under Water, which obligates Parties to prohibit,
to prevent, and not to carry out any nuclear weapons test
explosion, or any other nuclear explosion, in outer space.
--The United States has maintained its moratorium on
explosive nuclear testing and has supported a voluntary
testing moratorium by all states.
--The U.S. recommends that Section 3.1 be revised to read:
---"(a) the existing framework regulating outer space
activities to which Subscribing States are a Party to, inter
alia:"
-and, in the sixth sub-bullet:
---"The prohibitions on nuclear explosions in outer space

STATE 00002007 005 OF 005


-Finally, the United States notes that the implementation of
the organizational structure described in "IV. Organisational
Aspects" should be carried out without duplicating the
efforts of existing international organizations and their
roles and responsibilities under the existing legal framework
relating to outer space activities.

-The United States welcomes the opportunity for continued
dialogue with EU experts on these concerns. In these
discussions, we also would propose to discuss approaches for
joint collaboration with other like-minded spacefaring
nations to advance this initiative and to enhance this
proposal's potential for reinforcing the principle of free
access to, and use of, outer space in the interest of
maintaining international peace and security.

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

END TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER.


5. (U) Any inquiries on this subject should be referred to
the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation
(PoC: Richard Buenneke, 1-202-647-3731;
buennekerh@state.gov).
RICE