Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RPODUBAI366
2009-09-02 14:43:00
SECRET
Iran RPO Dubai
Cable title:  

IRAN OFFICIALS, PRESS SPIN IAEA REPORT ON EVE OF P5+1

Tags:  PGOV IR PREL PARM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7056
OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHDIR #0366/01 2451443
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 021443Z SEP 09
FM RPO DUBAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0512
INFO RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUMICEA/USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI IMMEDIATE 0403
RUEHDIR/RPO DUBAI 0513
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 RPO DUBAI 000366 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 9/2/2019
TAGS: PGOV IR PREL PARM
SUBJECT: IRAN OFFICIALS, PRESS SPIN IAEA REPORT ON EVE OF P5+1
MEETING

DUBAI 00000366 001.2 OF 004


CLASSIFIED BY: Alan Eyre, Director, Iran Regional Presence
Office, DOS.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 RPO DUBAI 000366

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 9/2/2019
TAGS: PGOV IR PREL PARM
SUBJECT: IRAN OFFICIALS, PRESS SPIN IAEA REPORT ON EVE OF P5+1
MEETING

DUBAI 00000366 001.2 OF 004


CLASSIFIED BY: Alan Eyre, Director, Iran Regional Presence
Office, DOS.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(d)

1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Though Iran's envoy to the IAEA Ali Asghar
Soltanieh and the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization
Ali Akbar Salehi took the nominal lead in spinning the August 28
IAEA report as a vindication of Iran's positions, their public
comments offered little new insight to the Iranian leadership's
mindset as the IRIG prepares to present its "revised proposal"
to the P5+1. However, the September 1 lead editorial of the
hardcore conservative Kayhan newspaper, whose editorial stance
is closely aligned with the Supreme Leader and whose editor is
reputedly a confidante of Khamenei, provides an extensive
evaluation of the report and its political implications for
Iran. The lengthy editorial argues that the United States has
already concluded Iran will eventually join the nuclear club.
The editorial characterizes I ran as occupying a position of
strength and thereby not needing to negotiate, whereas due to
(inter alia) its regional concerns the U.S. is compelled to seek
interaction with Iran. END SUMMARY.



Iran's Revised Proposal Ready




2. (U) On September 1 Secretary of the Supreme National Security
and chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili told reporters Iran is
"ready to present a proposal to help resolve the world's common
concerns and work toward the establishment of justice and peace.
Jalili said that Iran's offer last year to negotiate was
interrupted by various problems, to include the conflict in
Georgia, the world economic crisis, and the U.S. presidential
election. "Now," however, after the "glorious presidential
election in our country and with the authority and backing of a
strong republic, we have a new proposal to offer." Jalili's
announcement came on the heels of aggressive campaign by IRIG
senior officials and media to characterize the August 28 IAEA
report as vindication of the peaceful nature of its nuclear
program and highlight its cooperation with the IAEA.



IRIG Officials Play Up Positive Aspects of IAEA Report




3. (U) Predictably, Iran is interpreting the latest IAEA report

as a vindication of its positions, with headlines quoting Iran's
IAEA Representative Dr. Ali Asghar Soltanieh as saying, "from
Iran's point of view the nuclear issue is settled." The new head
of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi,
emphasized the latest report is more positive than previous IAEA
reports, a development he attributed in an interview on state
radio to "Iran's new approach." (NOTE: This "new approach" is
presumably a reference to Iran's decision to allow IAEA
inspectors to visit the heavy water reactor at Arak and the
Natanz enrichment facility.) A common IRIG talking point,
echoed by both Soltanieh and Salehi as well as by Majles members
andother sources, is that with this report IAEA chief Mohammad
ElBaradei has declared Iran's nuclear program peaceful "for the
twentieth time." (COMMENT: In this regard one can expect that
the IRIG will make optimal publicity use of El-Baradei's just
disclosed July comments that Iran's nuclear threat is "hyped,"
reported extensively in Iranian and Western press on September
2).



Iran's "New Approach" Pays Dividends




4. (U) After the report was released on August 28, in an
interview with ISNA Soltanieh outlined examples of how Iran's
"pro-active cooperation" with the IAEA resulted in more
favorable report. Specifically, he referenced the IRIG's
decision to allow inspectors into the heavy water reactor at
Arak, a move he said goes beyond Iran's treaty obligations. He
also said the IAEA heralded Iran's decision to give inspectors
access to Natanz, noting that "Iran has carried out enrichment
at Natanz with full transparency under the supervision and
inspection of Agency cameras and inspection is ongoing."
Soltanieh pointed to Iran's agreement to allow surprise
inspections as another positive aspect of the IRIG's cooperation
with the IAEA, emphasizing that Iran and the Agency agreed on
procedures for unannounced inspections within the context of the
Comprehensive Safeguards (vice the Additional Protocol).

DUBAI 00000366 002.2 OF 004


Similarly, he noted Iran and the IAEA have agreed on a method
for accounting for nuclear materials. In an August 30 ISNA
interview Salehi also played up Iran's improved working
relationship with the IAEA, attributing the Agency's decision to
"resist certain belligerent countries" by excluding
"undocumented studies" from its report as a direct benefit of
Iran's enhanced cooperation.




5. (U) An August 30 pro-Ahmadinejad Fars News Agency piece
focused on Salehi's criticism of the IAEA's referral of Iran to
the UN Security Council, a step he termed "illegal" and
"illogical" given Iran's fulfillment of its obligations. The
same article characterized Salehi as "lambasting" the West's
"double standards" and describing allegations against Iran's
nuclear program as politically motivated.



Kayhan Editorial Offers Window into Leadership's Mindset?




6. (U) The September 1 lead editorial from the hardcore
conservative newspaper Kayhan dealt with the latest IAEA report
and the possibility of Iran-US nuclear discussions. Since this
paper's editorial stance is widely regarded as a relection of
that of the Supreme Leader, it is worth considering at length.
Concerning the August IAEA report, the editorial said:



From a legal standpoint:



- The latest report is repetitive, with all the so-called
"negative" points having been included in previous reports, to
include the fact that Iran has not carried out verified
suspension of its enrichment activities and that since the
passage of UNSCR 1737 Iran has refused to carry out Code 3.1 of
the Subsidiary Arrangements. Additionally, as Iran does not
consider discussion of the "Alleged Studies" to be credible
enough to discuss with the IAEA.



- Iran won't suspend its program because it views the forwarding
of Iran's nuclear portfolio to the UN Security Council in
February 2006 as a violation of the IAEA charter. Also,

Iranian suspension would vitiate any probably subsequent
discussions in the future, as the talks held in 2003-2005
demonstrate.



- Iran will not carry out the Additional Protocols and Code 3.1
of the Subsidiary Arrangements because they are all voluntary
and Iran has no legal obligation to implement them. Also,
forwarding Iran's case to the Security Council led the Majles to
pass a law barring the government from executing voluntary
actions.



From a technical viewpoint:



- This report differed from previous ones, confirming that there
are now more than 7000 IR-1 centrifuges, whereas at the time of
the last report there were approximately 5000 installed at
Natanz.



- The report's technical section shows that Iran has solved all
technical problems relating to expanding enrichment capacity and
now has the technical ability for "any type of political
decision" it wishes to make. More importantly, the continuous
increase in the number of centrifuges shows that Iran's domestic
internal political crises do not influence the rate of
development of Iran's nuclear program.


DUBAI 00000366 003.2 OF 004




From a political viewpoint:



- the legal aspects of the IAEA's latest report are unimportant
relative to the political ones.. What are important to note are
the political factors that influenced this report as well the
report's political influence on the nuclear portfolio and Iran's
national security. It is clear that 'the Americans, Europeans
and Zionists' saw a negative IAEA report as essential for the
G-6 Group Strategy on Iran. To this end, the West put heavy
pressure on the IAEA for maximum negativity in this report.



- This strategy derives from President Obama's strategy, which
emphasizes the necessity of negotiating with Iran. America's
regional problems compel it to engage with Iran, but the West
now senses that Iran doesn't feel the need for talks with the
West.



- The goal of the G-6 diplomacy is to draw Iran into
negotiations and it is for this reasons that, in contrast to the
past, they have expunged the word "suspension" from their
vocabulary when talking about Iran.



- The West now knows that Iran's new government, with its
massive validation by the recent Presidential vote, is in a very
favorable position to resist Western demands. The West doesn't
believe the lies they themselves have created and know that
there was no fraud in the recent election.



-Despite 'crazy Israeli assertions' that Iran's nuclear program
has passed the point of no return and as such the only choice is
living with the threat of a nuclear Iran or launching a military
attack against Iran, the U.S. has clearly said that there is
only one option and that is accepting Iran in the nuclear
countries club. America's viewpoint is that all that can be
done is to adopt a series of cautionary measures such as
extending American's nuclear umbrella to the region as Secretary
Clinton has mentioned. Therefore, it would not be strange if
the West had concluded that talks with Iran must start as soon
as possible, and if Iran is not currently willing to engage in
this process it must be forced to do so.



- Western talk of gasoline sanctions is borne of such a
mentality. No one in the West says that if Iran does not
suspend enrichment they will block oil exports to Iran; instead,
all the talk is that if Iran does not enter talks by the end of
September with the G-6 Group, "studying additional sanctions
will begin." As such, the threat of sanctions is essentially 'a
disrespectful way of requesting Iran to enter negotiations.'



- The West's problem is that (inter alia) enacting a new round
of sanctions will face Russian and Chinese opposition, given
that the IAEA has announced that Iran's nuclear program is
peaceful and under supervision. Therefore, the West has decided
to bring pressure on the IAEA by publishing forged documents
(NOTE: "alleged studies") as annexes to its report, and thereby
strengthen its position with those who oppose sanctions. But it
is important to note that the report doe not in any way confirm
the authenticity of these "alleged studies."



- In conclusion, the most important consequence of the latest
IAEA report is that the IAEA places no credibility in the
"alleged studies" and this in turn actually signifies the
closing of Iran's nuclear file. The 2007 "Agreed Modalities"
document between Iran and the IAEA specified six subjects for
discussion and now all six have been concluded.




DUBAI 00000366 004.2 OF 004



7. (C) COMMENT: Iran is spinning the latest IAEA report to
contend that its nuclear issues with the IAEA are settled, and
all else is Western bullying and bluster. As for the
announcement of its "new, improved" package, it is unclear
whether it will be substantively different from the one it put
on the table in May 2008. END COMMENT.
EYRE