Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RIGA318
2009-06-09 09:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Riga
Cable title:  

PRESSING LATVIA ON ITS FINANCIAL SITUATION

Tags:  EFIN PGOV PREL ECON EUN IMF LG 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4032
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRA #0318/01 1600908
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 090908Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY RIGA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5881
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000318 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/09/2024
TAGS: EFIN PGOV PREL ECON EUN IMF LG
SUBJECT: PRESSING LATVIA ON ITS FINANCIAL SITUATION

REF: A) RIGA 314 B) RIGA 290 C) RIGA 238 D) RIGA 182

Classified By: Charge d'affaires Bruce D Rogers. Reason: 1.4 (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000318

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/09/2024
TAGS: EFIN PGOV PREL ECON EUN IMF LG
SUBJECT: PRESSING LATVIA ON ITS FINANCIAL SITUATION

REF: A) RIGA 314 B) RIGA 290 C) RIGA 238 D) RIGA 182

Classified By: Charge d'affaires Bruce D Rogers. Reason: 1.4 (d)


1. (C/NF) The Latvian government continues to struggle with
making the necessary structural reforms to implement the
terms of it's IMF/EC assistance package. Failure to do so
could have serious consequences not only for Latvia, but for
a number of other states in the region. The U.S. has a
strategic interest in avoiding this scenario with regard to
Latvia as well as avoiding the spillover to other countries.
Latvian efforts to date have been hampered by weak political
leadership, a culture of corruption, and a lack of human
capacity. It seems that the results of the June 6 elections
will not effect the process in the short term, but they
certainly won't make the medium-term strategy any easier.
From our perspective, it seems that the EU is unwilling to
take a tough line with the Latvians and the IMF fears being
seen as "the bad guys," which contribute to the problem. We
believe that strong messages are needed to Latvia's leaders,
as well as key EU and IMF officials, to stress the U.S.
commitment to Latvia, but to express concern that the process
is getting off track and needs quickly to be righted.


2. (C/NF) The Latvian government's current proposal is to
adopt amendments to the budget in final form by June 17.
Leaders agreed on June 8 to cut 500 million lats (roughly a
billion dollars) from the planned 2009 budget, or about 10
percent of the budget, in that nine day period. Since
December, Latvian officials have been telling us that they
are making painful cuts and slashing salaries and personnel.
Our experience is that personnel reductions to date have been
slim and salary cuts have been largely implemented through
compulsory, unpaid leave and reductions in allowances and
bonuses. The state auditor, a respected non-partisan figure,
reports that she has yet to see the government take a
strategic approach to considering what functions government

should undertake and what resources should be allocated to
them. The IMF team on the ground similarly reports that
Latvian proposals to date have lacked credibility. Latvia's
political system, which is based more on personalities than
on policy and in which parties largely exist to line the
pockets of powerful patrons, directly contributes to the
problem. Reform of the system is a long-term project that
needs more attention - and outside resources - in parallel to
the structural reforms. Finally, the politicization of
government hiring in recent years means that the crop of
Latvian bureaucrats able to act impartially in proposing
changes to the governmental structure and budget are limited.
Additional outside technical assistance may be needed.


3. (C/NF) In Latvia, we recommend that Washington instruct
the Charge to demarche the Prime Minister, Speaker, Justice
Minister (as head of the People's Party) and President along
the following lines:

-- The United States is concerned about the relatively slow
pace of implementation of the structural reforms required by
the agreements with the IMF, European Commission and others.
Since December, many plans have been announced but few
implemented. We are long-standing friends and Allies, and we
present these impressions out of desire to help with an
outside perspective.

-- The goal of the program remains to meet the Maastricht
criteria to allow Latvia to join the Euro-zone. We support
that.

-- We welcome the June 8 agreements between the government
and social partners to cut an additional 500 million lats
from this year's budget.

-- But a strategic view of the role of government and the
relative priority of various activities is needed, not simply
mandating percentage cuts in various sectors. We know it is
hard to declare any government program or position
"expendable," but without making the hard choices, we do not
see any way to reach the ultimate goal.

-- And while we understand that spending this year may need
to be higher than planned to maintain social order, the
program must be seen as a multi-year effort to get to a 3%
deficit.

-- Financial markets have noticed the reluctance to make
hard decisions and are beginning to react. Some of the
quotes about devaluation being inevitable may overstate the
situation, but it is clear that if Latvia does not
demonstrate the will to create significant wage deflation,
the external pressure to devalue will only continue to build.


RIGA 00000318 002 OF 002


-- Observers are also looking for evidence that political
parties are themselves serious about reform and reductions,
and not simply about taking care of their supporters or
patrons.

-- Latvia does not have a lot of time. Opinions are
crystallizing and markets reacting. These decisions cannot
be placed to the side, while parties decide how to realign
following Saturday's elections. It is essential that the
government and Saeima adopt a strong, credible plan before
going on summer recess.

-- Further work will be needed in future. More painful
choices will be necessary. But if Latvia takes the tough
steps, the United States will support you in your efforts.


4. (C/NF) While it is beyond our area of responsibility, we
would encourage that consideration be given to a strong
message to the European Commission and the IMF to urge them
to be far more direct in their dealings with Latvian
officials. Additionally, we are concerned by reports both
from the IMF team here as well as rumors within the
government that the IMF and Commission representatives on the
ground are not fully coordinated in their efforts. We cannot
have a situation in which the two work at cross-purposes or
with different definitions of success.


5. (C/NF) We can expect real pushback from the Latvians.
They will say we don't understand their situation, suggest we
are playing into Russian hands, and threaten major cuts in
defense spending. But we need to stay firm in our resolve.
ROGERS