Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RIGA180
2009-04-01 07:55:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Riga
Cable title:  

PRESIDENT DOES NOT DISMISS PARLIAMENT; SEARCHING

Tags:  PRGOV PINR LG 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6052
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRA #0180/01 0910755
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 010755Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY RIGA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5735
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000180 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2024
TAGS: PRGOV PINR LG
SUBJECT: PRESIDENT DOES NOT DISMISS PARLIAMENT; SEARCHING
FOR INFLUENCE

REF: A) RIGA 33 B) RIGA 152

Classified By: Charge d'affaires a.i. Bruce D. Rogers. Reason: 1.4(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000180

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2024
TAGS: PRGOV PINR LG
SUBJECT: PRESIDENT DOES NOT DISMISS PARLIAMENT; SEARCHING
FOR INFLUENCE

REF: A) RIGA 33 B) RIGA 152

Classified By: Charge d'affaires a.i. Bruce D. Rogers. Reason: 1.4(d)


1. (C/NF) Summary: President Zatlers announced March 31 that
he would not initiate a dismissal of Saeima (parliament) as
he threatened to do January 14 if certain tasks were not
completed. The President said that enough progress had been
made and that the new government was working well enough to
cause him not to pursue dissolution. At the same time, he
identified new tasks for parliament, but did not couch them
as an ultimatum. He said that he retains the right and the
willingness to initiate a dissolution if necessary. While
Zatlers is right that the political climate in the country
has improved since January, some of his actions actually
hindered the progress. Having backed down once, he cannot
credibly make a dismissal threat again without risking his
own job. The entire episode demonstrates that Zatlers
remains naive about politics and is unlikely to greatly
improve his standing with the public. End summary.


2. (U) President Zatlers addressed the nation March 31,
itself a rare event in Latvia, to explain that he would not
initiate a dissolution of Saeima as he threatened to do
January 14 if certain tasks were not accomplished (ref a).
The President reviewed the growing public distrust in
parliament and government over the past two years and
explained that the violence of January 13 led him to take
tough action to restore confidence in the political order.
He said that most of the tasks he set forth had been
completed and that additional progress had been made in
several areas related to rule of law. All that remains is to
pass constitutional amendments allowing the public to
initiate a dissolution of Saeima. He expressed confidence
that these would be adopted next week. He also said that new
government of PM Dombrovskis was doing well and tackling
tough issues in Latvia's economy. He asserted his right and
willingness to initiate a dissolution of parliament in future
if he deems it necessary. Finally, he said that the
parliament should adopt a new budget, support business,
ensure a social safety net, and undertake reforms to
electoral and campaign laws to improve the political culture.
This, however, was not made an ultimatum.


3. (C/NF) While Zatlers is correct that the political
situation has improved since January, the public's trust has
not risen dramatically from the historic lows (below 10
percent) of earlier this year. While the President's
ultimatum may have helped rein in the worst excesses of the
parties, Zatlers himself was a major stumbling block along
the way. He wanted a wider coalition, but seemed to insist
on simply adding to the existing one. He wanted ten people
like former PM Godmanis in the cabinet when opposition
parties were making Godmanis' removal a pre-condition to join
the government. He lost confidence in Godmanis on a Friday
evening, but found it again on a Monday, spooking markets and
investors in between. He insisted on smaller government, but
accepted a new government with the same ministries as its
predecessors.

4. (C/NF) While the President retains the constitutional
right to dismiss the Saeima another ultimatum would not be
credible. Parties reacted negatively to this one, even the
ones then in opposition, for upsetting the constitutional
order. Latvia is a parliamentary republic and the Presidency
was created as a weak office. Zatlers' attempt to force his
will -- and his uneven performance that followed -- left many
shaking their heads. The episode did not appreciably improve
the President's public standing (although it also has not
weakened it). If he mishandles the parliament in future,
his own job could be in danger.

5. (C/NF) This entire episode has highlighted Zatlers'
limited political acumen and the lack of good political
advisors around him. He had the best of intentions. He
wanted to do something to acknowledge the frustrations of the
people. But ultimatums of the scope he set out on January 14
are tricky in politics, where there are many moving parts and
movement in one area changes the plans in another. Yes, he
succeeded in getting an anti-corruption chief, but probably
not the best candidate for the job. But approving the choice
of the previous coalition was likely part of the bargain some
of those parties made to join the new coalition. In the end,
much of the reforms in government will be driven by terms of
the international financial assistance package rather than
Zatlers' desires.

6. (C/NF) Going forward, there are two ways Zatlers could
more effectively influence events. Latvia still lacks a
leader willing to level with society about the breadth and
depth of the coming budget cuts and explain their necessity.
In his speech, the President only said they would be painful
and difficult. He could start trying to create a national
consensus on the need to accept the pain now for the sake of
the future. He also has the right to submit draft

RIGA 00000180 002 OF 002


legislation to parliament, something he has only rarely used
If he wants to see changes to the laws on campaigns and
party financing, for example, he should submit draft bills to
parliament to shape the debate. These would be far more
effective ways to exercise influence.
ROGERS