Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RABAT356
2009-04-28 12:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rabat
Cable title:
GOM CONCERNED ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGE TO UNSC
VZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHRB #0356 1181253 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 281253Z APR 09 FM AMEMBASSY RABAT TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0038 INFO RUCNMGH/MAGHREB COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 0521 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 0439 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0937 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 1148
C O N F I D E N T I A L RABAT 000356
SIPDIS
STATE FOR IO/UNP AND NEA/MAG
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2014
TAGS: PREL PBTS UNSC WI MO
SUBJECT: GOM CONCERNED ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGE TO UNSC
WESTERN SAHARA RESOLUTION
REF: USUN 0434
Classified By: CDA Robert P. Jackson. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L RABAT 000356
SIPDIS
STATE FOR IO/UNP AND NEA/MAG
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2014
TAGS: PREL PBTS UNSC WI MO
SUBJECT: GOM CONCERNED ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGE TO UNSC
WESTERN SAHARA RESOLUTION
REF: USUN 0434
Classified By: CDA Robert P. Jackson. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) On April 28, MFA Chief of Staff and Director General
for Multilateral Affairs Nasser Bourita raised with PolCouns
GOM concerns about the evolving Western Sahara UNSC
Resolution in New York. With only three non-permanent
members not supporting basis draft circulated by the Friends,
he saw no reason for such a change.
2. (C) Bourita said the GOM understood that a paragraph had
been submitted by the UK with reference to the improving the
human dimension in the Western Sahara, and it had heard that
the USG was prepared to support this. This was distressing
to Morocco which had decided not to ask for anything more
than a repeat of last year,s resolution and had been told by
senior interlocutors in Washington that such was the USG
position. The adoption of such a paragraph would be
portrayed by the Polisario and Algeria as a diplomatic
victory for them and thus would undermine rather than promote
progress in the negotiations. The GOM was strongly opposed.
3. (C) Bourita said that the GOM viewed the Polisario as its
political interlocutor, but from a legal perspective, the
Polisario had no role in guaranteeing human rights, as it was
not a signatory to the relevant international conventions.
Rather that role was in the hands of the Government of
Algeria, which was a signatory and so responsible for the
human rights situation in its territory.
4. (C) When pressed, Bourita said that at minimum, the GOM
opposed a separate paragraph, which would be seen as a
Polisario paragraph. Morocco could live with reference to a
humanitarian rather than human dimension, a concept which had
little meaning to the GOM. If some minor adjustment was
necessary, it preferred that this be through an adjustment of
a few words in an existing paragraph.
*****************************************
Visit Embassy Rabat's Classified Website;
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Moro cco
*****************************************
Jackson
SIPDIS
STATE FOR IO/UNP AND NEA/MAG
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2014
TAGS: PREL PBTS UNSC WI MO
SUBJECT: GOM CONCERNED ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGE TO UNSC
WESTERN SAHARA RESOLUTION
REF: USUN 0434
Classified By: CDA Robert P. Jackson. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) On April 28, MFA Chief of Staff and Director General
for Multilateral Affairs Nasser Bourita raised with PolCouns
GOM concerns about the evolving Western Sahara UNSC
Resolution in New York. With only three non-permanent
members not supporting basis draft circulated by the Friends,
he saw no reason for such a change.
2. (C) Bourita said the GOM understood that a paragraph had
been submitted by the UK with reference to the improving the
human dimension in the Western Sahara, and it had heard that
the USG was prepared to support this. This was distressing
to Morocco which had decided not to ask for anything more
than a repeat of last year,s resolution and had been told by
senior interlocutors in Washington that such was the USG
position. The adoption of such a paragraph would be
portrayed by the Polisario and Algeria as a diplomatic
victory for them and thus would undermine rather than promote
progress in the negotiations. The GOM was strongly opposed.
3. (C) Bourita said that the GOM viewed the Polisario as its
political interlocutor, but from a legal perspective, the
Polisario had no role in guaranteeing human rights, as it was
not a signatory to the relevant international conventions.
Rather that role was in the hands of the Government of
Algeria, which was a signatory and so responsible for the
human rights situation in its territory.
4. (C) When pressed, Bourita said that at minimum, the GOM
opposed a separate paragraph, which would be seen as a
Polisario paragraph. Morocco could live with reference to a
humanitarian rather than human dimension, a concept which had
little meaning to the GOM. If some minor adjustment was
necessary, it preferred that this be through an adjustment of
a few words in an existing paragraph.
*****************************************
Visit Embassy Rabat's Classified Website;
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Moro cco
*****************************************
Jackson