Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09QUITO332
2009-05-08 12:46:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Quito
Cable title:  

GOE PAYS U.S. ELECTRICITY FIRM MACHALA POWER, RESOLVES

Tags:  ECON EPET ENRG EINV EC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0008
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHQT #0332 1281246
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081246Z MAY 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0347
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 8132
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3536
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ MAY LIMA 3189
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4309
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS QUITO 000332 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/EPSC FAITH CORNEILLE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EPET ENRG EINV EC
SUBJECT: GOE PAYS U.S. ELECTRICITY FIRM MACHALA POWER, RESOLVES
INVESTMENT DISPUTE

REFTEL: QUITO 22

UNCLAS QUITO 000332

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/EPSC FAITH CORNEILLE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EPET ENRG EINV EC
SUBJECT: GOE PAYS U.S. ELECTRICITY FIRM MACHALA POWER, RESOLVES
INVESTMENT DISPUTE

REFTEL: QUITO 22


1. (SBU) Summary: The GOE paid $60 million in March and April 2009
in settlement of an investment dispute with U.S. electricity company
Machala Power, following an agreement between the two parties in
December 2008. Machala Power has withdrawn its international
arbitration claim and continues to operate its electricity plant,
but does not plan substantial additional investments in Ecuador at
this time. End Summary.


2. (U) In December 2008, the two parties signed an agreement that
the GOE would pay arrears owed to Machala Power by state-owned
electricity companies, and Machala Power would drop its arbitration
case (reftel). One of Noble Energy's two subsidiaries in Ecuador,
Machala Power generates electricity using natural gas produced by
its sister company EDC. The company filed for international
arbitration in March 2005, but continued to seek a negotiated
settlement with the GOE.


3. (SBU) The GOE did not immediately make the payment as
established in the December agreement because of its growing fiscal
problems. In early 2009, the GOE asked Machala Power if would still
accept the agreement if the GOE paid on a short installment plan,
and Machala Power agreed. During March and April 2009, the GOE paid
Machala Power $60 million in five $12 million installments. This
amount reflects the arrears accumulated through August 26, 2008, as
agreed by Machala Power and the appropriate GOE agencies.


4. (SBU) The GOE still owes Machala Power approximately $20 million
for arrears since August 2008, but Machala Power withdrew its
arbitration case on April 22, 2009. EDC and Machala Power General
Manager John Tomich acknowledged that withdrawing the arbitration
case could reduce leverage to obtain the remaining payment, but said
that Machala Power was complying with the terms of its December
agreement. The GOE has not publicly acknowledged that it has made
the payments or that Machala Power is withdrawing its arbitration.
Tomich believes the GOE is hesitant to announce the payments at a
time when the government is curtailing expenditures to conserve
scarce reserves because of declining revenue.


5. (SBU) Tomich met with the Ambassador April 30 to report the
resolution of the dispute and express his thanks for Embassy
support. He said that his company was pleased with the developments
and the government's efforts to resolve the investment dispute.
However, he was concerned that the GOE may have unrealistic
expectations for EDC's natural gas development plans. He claimed
that the GOE was signing an agreement with a company that was to
install a gas liquefaction plant next to Machala Power's electricity
plant, to liquefy EDC's natural gas for shipping to the city of
Cuenca. However, Tomich cautioned that the proven reserves of the
EDC field were only sufficient to run the power plant and not enough
for additional projects. Although there was the possibility that
additional gas could be available with further investment, Tomich
commented that Ecuador's current investment climate and low energy
prices were not conducive to the substantial lump-sum additional
investment necessary for expansion.


6. (SBU) Comment: Tomich gave a somewhat different message than a
year ago, when Noble Energy was exploring expanding natural gas
production and possibly providing additional gas to another U.S.
electricity company that would relocate to Machala. That plan was
contingent upon EDC obtaining certain approvals, but the GOE
rejected EDC's development plan. Since then, EDC has presented two
new development plans, substantially scaling back its commitment
each time. Although Machala Power and EDC remain in Ecuador,
another clash may be brewing with the GOE over differing
expectations. End Comment.

HODGES