Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PRAGUE340
2009-06-17 14:47:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Prague
Cable title:  

FOREIGN DEPLOYMENTS PROPOSAL PASSES CZECH LOWER

Tags:  PGOV PREL MARR EZ AF 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1357
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHPG #0340/01 1681447
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171447Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY PRAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1479
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0114
RUEHPS/AMEMBASSY PRISTINA PRIORITY 0066
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 1972
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 000340 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/18/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL MARR EZ AF
SUBJECT: FOREIGN DEPLOYMENTS PROPOSAL PASSES CZECH LOWER
HOUSE

REF: A. 08 PRAGUE 792

B. 08 PRAGUE 779

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 000340

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/18/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL MARR EZ AF
SUBJECT: FOREIGN DEPLOYMENTS PROPOSAL PASSES CZECH LOWER
HOUSE

REF: A. 08 PRAGUE 792

B. 08 PRAGUE 779


1. (C) Summary: On June 16, the Czech parliament's lower
house approved a 2010 troop deployment proposal that, among
other deployments, includes 535 Czech troops for Afghanistan.
Senate approval should follow. This smooth approval is a
stark contrast to the contentiousness of the 2009 deployment
proposal. However, the March fall of the Topolanek
government removed the bitter personal feud between him and
Social Democrat Party (CSSD) leader Paroubek that had colored
the last year's proposal, and unlike last year, the Defense
Ministry engaged all parties early on and made concessions in
numbers. Swift approval of the proposal is a remarkable
achievement for PM Jan Fischer's interim government, but
there are no guarantees future deployment proposals will be
approved so smoothly. End Summary.

Wide Support, Despite CSSD Rumblings
--------------


2. (SBU) On June 16, the Czech Chamber of Deputies (lower
house of parliament) passed the 2010 foreign deployments
proposal by a vote of 122 out of the 173 deputies present.
The proposal, which the interim technocratic cabinet of PM
Jan Fischer approved on June 8, was approved by the Defense
Committee of the lower house on June 9. All the Civic
Democratic (ODS),Green and Christian Democratic deputies
present voted for the proposal; all of the unreformed
Communists (KSCM) MPs present voted against it.


3. (SBU) In 2009, CSSD opposition almost derailed the
deployment proposal (refs A and B). This time, despite
rumblings by some CSSD deputies that the number of troops
serving abroad was too high, the proposal garnered wide
support among CSSD MPs, with 35 voting for it, including
Foreign Affairs Committee chair Jan Hamacek, and Defense
Committee deputy chairs Miroslav Svoboda and Antonin Seda.
CSSD head Jiri Paroubek and CSSD shadow Foreign Minister were
absent.


4. (U) Unlike a normal bill, this proposal does not require
a first and second reading, merely a single vote. The next
step is Senate approval. The ODS-dominated Senate is likely
to easily pass the deployments proposal. The deployments

approved for 2010 were 535 soldiers in the International
Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and a 550-soldier
KFOR peace keeping mission in Kosovo. The proposal did not
include a special forces contingent, since the Czech special
forces are finishing their current 18-current deployment and
will not be available for deployment in 2010. The foreign
deployments also include: 2 troops in Bosnia (EU Operation);
5 troops in Chad and the Central African Republic
(UN-MINURCAT); 3 troops in Sinai (MFO); 3 troops in Britain
(EU NAVFOR ATALANTA); 220 troops in the first-half of 2010
and then 360 troops in the second-half of 2010 in NATO
missions (NATO Response Force).

A Contrast to the 2009 Proposal
--------------


5. (C) Although foreign deployment proposals are not usually
contentious and garner bipartisan support, last year's
deployment bill did not enjoy a smooth ride. In a populist
move, Jiri Paroubek and CSSD based their negative stance on
calculations of domestic personal political advantage, using
the 2009 deployments proposal to gain concessions on health
care fees and to hammer ODS leader and former Prime Minister
Mirek Topolanek. This caused the bill to languish in the
lower house late into December and delayed its passage until
February 2009.


6. (C) The fall of former PM Topolanek's ODS government
helped assure the proposal's passage. According to CSSD
deputy Defense Committee chair Svoboda, with the bitter
Topolanek-Paroubek personality feud out of the way, ODS and
CSSD quickly agreed to remove deployments from their
political disputes and to honor Czech obligations to
international security. Prague Security Studies Institute
Director Jiri Schneider also credited passage to the
Topolanek government's fall and departure from the scene.


7. (C) In addition, the Ministry of Defense also got out
early this year and engaged all the parties to ensure smooth

PRAGUE 00000340 002 OF 002


passage. In a concession to CSSD, MOD's proposal this year
included a slight reduction of forces that were better
concentrated in certain areas and focused on reconstruction
and training, issues that were important to some MPs.

A Swift Approval, But No Guarantee for the Future
-------------- --------------


8. (C) Comment: The ODS-CSSD consensus, and approval before
October parliamentary elections, were remarkable. The
Fischer government is a caretaker government that as a rule
is seeking to postpone divisive issues until after October
parliamentary elections, even though Fischer stated that one
of its goals was approval of the deployment proposal.


9. (C) Comment (continued): That removal of the
Topolanek-Paroubek feud eased passage is a testament to the
degree to which personality spats have poisoned Czech
politics -- and to what unpoisoned Czech politics might look
like. There is no guarantee that future deployment proposals
will be this smooth. CSSD leader Paroubek, whose party may
well win in October, showed with the 2009 proposal that he is
willing to use deployments for domestic political gain.
While he may feel more constrained against doing so if he is
PM, Paroubek and his CSSD remain uncertain supporters of
future deployments. End Comment.
Thompson-Jones