Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PODGORICA49
2009-02-24 19:17:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Podgorica
Cable title:  

NEW CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAW: IMPROVED, BUT NOT ENOUGH

Tags:  PGOV PREL EFIN ECON MW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1308
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHPOD #0049/01 0551917
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 241917Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
INFO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1186
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHPOD/AMEMBASSY PODGORICA 1274
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PODGORICA 000049 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL EFIN ECON MW
SUBJECT: NEW CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAW: IMPROVED, BUT NOT ENOUGH

REF: 08 Podgorica 279

PODGORICA 00000049 001.2 OF 003


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PODGORICA 000049

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL EFIN ECON MW
SUBJECT: NEW CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAW: IMPROVED, BUT NOT ENOUGH

REF: 08 Podgorica 279

PODGORICA 00000049 001.2 OF 003



1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Montenegro's new Law on the Conflict of
Interest, adopted in January, restricts the private business
activities of public officials. But while many observers
concede that it is a step forward from the roundly criticized
previous law, they question the independence of the commission
charged with reviewing conflict of interest cases and express
concerns over the absence of more severe penalties. The law
also appears to have some major blind spots, as in the recent
case of a GoM loan to a bank partially owned by the PM's brother
(and the PM himself, via a blind trust) attests. END SUMMARY.



Montenegro Adopts New Conflict of Interest Law

-------------- -




2. (SBU) The adoption of a new Conflict of Interest Law has been
on the GoM's plate for some time. The European Commission and
the Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) had sharply
criticized the previous 2004 law - which Vanja Calovic of the
anti-corruption NGO MANS publicly called "the worst in the
region," because of a number of loopholes. As a result the GoM
was under considerable pressure to pass a better bill.




3. (U) After a lengthy saga, on January 9, President Vujanovic
finally signed the new law, which among other things:



--defines public officials, whether appointed or elected, who
are covered;

--requires officials to declare all income and transfer
management of companies they own to another person within 15
days of taking a government job;

--forbids public officials from directing or serving on the
boards of businesses and non-state public corporations;

--restricts post Government employment business activities
(e.g., there is a one-year "pause" before a former official can
do any business with the GoM);

--obliges public officials to refer to the Commission any
question about a potential conflict of interest

(i.e., before engaging in business activity, etc.);

--bans gifts over 50 Euros; and

--establishes a system of sanctions (fines, and in more serious
cases, referrals to the prosecutor) for infringements.




4. (SBU) As was the case with the previous law, the new law
establishes a seven-person Commission to review income
statements and possible conflicts of interest. But unlike the
previous law, under the new law, members of the Commission may
not belong to a political party.



Still Plenty of Flaws

--------------




5. (SBU) While generally praising the new law, both
international and domestic observers have noted a number of
flaws in the legislation. For example, a December 5 GRECO
compliance report criticized the fact that the law does not
cover all public officials. Likewise, an EC assessment noted
that:



--although Commission members may not belong to political
parties, their independence could be compromised by the fact
that they are confirmed by Parliament and are nominated by the
Parliament's Administrative Board;

--it is unclear how the Commission receives allegations of
violations, and whether a judicial review by an administrative
court is possible;

PODGORICA 00000049 002.2 OF 003



--there is no recusal system; and

--the penalties (fines) envisioned by the law are limited, and
the Commission is not permitted to remove officials from office.





6. (SBU) During the parliamentary debate over the law,
opposition parties also proposed more than two dozen amendments
which they said would toughen the law. In addition to the
issues outlined above, opposition MPs charged that the new law
allows MPs to sit on the boards of state-owned companies --
though the law forbids GoM officials from doing so. The
opposition also argued for more stringent sanctions.



President's Veto... Weakens Law

--------------




7. (SBU) After Parliament passed the new law on December 15 (the
opposition abstained),President Vujanovic vetoed it, citing an
inconsistency - namely, that public officials serving on the
boards of state-majority owned companies could receive
compensation, while public officials serving on the boards of
scientific, humanitarian, and sports associations could not.
(Note: Vujanovic had vetoed a previous draft as well, at that
time asserting that public officials should not be permitted to
serve on the boards of any state-owned company. End Note.)




8. (SBU) In late December, Parliament responded by allowing
compensation for all officials, including those on the boards of
non-commercial associations (rather than forbidding it for
officials serving on boards of state companies). In addition,
Predrag Boskovic, an MP of the ruling Democratic Party of
Socialists (DPS) who is on the board of the coal mine in
northern Montenegro, inserted a clause from the old law which
allowed MPs to serve on the boards of any company with a state
stake, no matter how small (the earlier version of the new law
specified that the state had to have a majority stake).
According to Calovic, President Vujanovic did not veto the bill
a third time, because the rest of the GoM leadership wanted the
law passed.



Blind To The Biggest Conflicts?

--------------




9. (SBU) The law also appears to concern only public officials
and members of their "household" (i.e. immediate family) - but
not other relatives - and does not limit officials who place
property or assets in a blind trust. These loopholes were
brought into stark relief in the controversy surrounding Prva
Banka, Montenegro's largest domestic bank, which has recently
encountered severe financial difficulties.




10. (SBU) Prva Banka has strong links to family and friends of
PM Milo Djukanovic. The PM's brother, Aco Djukanovic, who
bought into the bank in 2007, is its largest shareholder. The
PM's sister, Ana Kolarevic, has a small stake, and the managing
board of the bank includes a number of Djukanovic cronies. In
August 2007, Milo Djukanovic himself, who was then out of
government, took a 1.5 million Euro loan from an obscure London
bank to purchase shares in Prva Banka through his company
Capital Invest.




11. (SBU) Critics contend that DPS officials encouraged
state-owned companies (and private companies as well) to shift
deposits to Prva Banka. The bank expanded rapidly, with assets
growing from 29 million Euros in June 2006 to 546 million Euros
in mid-2006. But the bank's allegedly lax lending practices -
often to DPS cronies, according to critics - landed it in
financial hot water when the global economic crisis began. And
as the bank foundered, the following sequence of events
occurred:



PODGORICA 00000049 003.2 OF 003



--In late October, Parliament passed a new Law on Measures to
Protect the Banking System (reftel),which permitted the GoM to
grant loans to banks in return for shares as collateral; in
addition, the amount of the loan could not be more than the
nominal value of the shares.



--On November 25, Prva Banka's two biggest shareholders, Aco
Djukanovic and Montenegro's (state-owned) electricity company
(Elektroprivreda Crne Gore - EPCG) participated in a
re-capitalization of the bank worth 20 million Euros; Aco's
share of the bank increased to 46.48 percent, and EPCG's share
went from 9.46 percent to 18.24 percent. Milo Djukanovic's
Capital Invest ended up with 2.86 percent; and with his sister's
one percent share, the Djukanovic family is now the majority
shareholder. The opposition also noted that EPCG put six
million Euros (as "an investment") into the recapitalization at
a time when that company was experiencing its own financial
difficulties (EPCG had just decided to raise electricity prices
to consumers). Overall, Prva Banka's nominal value increased
from 26.7 million to 46.7 million Euros.



--On November 28, immediately following the recapitalization,
Prva Banka requested a 40 million Euro loan (an amount made
possible by the bank's recapitalization) to improve its
liquidity. Despite protests from the opposition - who pointed
out that the government was supporting a bank controlled by the
PM's family and friends - the GoM (from the budget and
administered through the Ministry of Finance) granted a
three-month loan at a 2.5 percent interest rate; however, the
terms of the loan allowed the repayment period to be extended to
one year. The PM told Parliament in December that the GoM had
stepped in to protect Prva Banka's depositors, not its
shareholders.




12. (SBU) At least one opposition party appealed to the
Commission on Conflict of Interest to ascertain the legality of
granting a loan to a bank in which the PM's brother is the
largest shareholder. MANS' Calovic told us that she had
consulted with several lawyers on the question, who agreed that
the PM did not violate either the old or new laws on conflict of
interest. According to Calovic, since Aco Djukanovic is not a
member of the PM's "household," his ownership of Prva Banka
shares does not constitute a conflict of interest. Moreover, as
long as the PM had put his own shares into a blind trust - he
was required to hand over the management of his company Capital
Invest to another person when he returned to head the GoM in
2008 - the PM was also in the clear, according to the letter of
the law.



Comment

--------------




13. (SBU) A number of our interlocutors, including opposition
political leaders and Calovic, have told us that the new law on
conflict of interest is an improvement over the old one.
However, as the Prva Banka case demonstrates, it contains some
massive loopholes. In addition, implementation of the law has
been lackluster. The Commission on Conflict of Interest
referred only five cases to the prosecutor between 2004 and
2008, and the press recently reported that less than 20 percent
of public officials filed the required income declarations last
year. The authorities clearly need to do a better of job of
enforcing the provisions that the law does stipulate.
KONTOS