Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PERTH51
2009-11-06 06:54:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Perth
Cable title:  

KIMBERLEY GAS SPLITS INDIGENOUS GROUPS

Tags:  ENRG EINV SENV AS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0743
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHPT #0051/01 3100654
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 060654Z NOV 09
FM AMCONSUL PERTH
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0434
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0440
RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE 0328
RUEHPT/AMCONSUL PERTH 0466
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0332
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0019
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0019
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0015
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 0019
RHMFISS/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PERTH 000051 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EEB MONOSSON
DOE FOR JEFF SKEER
USDOC FOR 3132/USFCS/OIO/EAP/JRULAND
USDOC FOR 4530/MAC/EAP/OPB/GPAINE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EINV SENV AS
SUBJECT: KIMBERLEY GAS SPLITS INDIGENOUS GROUPS

REF: A. A. PERTH 40

B. B. PERTH 42

PERTH 00000051 001.2 OF 002


THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.



UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PERTH 000051

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EEB MONOSSON
DOE FOR JEFF SKEER
USDOC FOR 3132/USFCS/OIO/EAP/JRULAND
USDOC FOR 4530/MAC/EAP/OPB/GPAINE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EINV SENV AS
SUBJECT: KIMBERLEY GAS SPLITS INDIGENOUS GROUPS

REF: A. A. PERTH 40

B. B. PERTH 42

PERTH 00000051 001.2 OF 002


THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.




1. (U) Summary: Indigenous communities in Western Australia's
northeast Kimberley region stand to gain significant
socio-economic benefits from an estimated A$60 billion (US$54
billion) worth of natural gas projects under consideration for
the area. Regional Indigenous leaders told us they are actively
negotiating commercial benefits from Woodside and other
companies looking to build an on-shore liquefied natural gas
(LNG) facility. They are also attempting to leverage improved
social services from the federal government. Traditional owners
remain deeply concerned about the impact of major gas projects
on Indigenous culture and practices. These concerns are
supported by international environmental groups, which have
stepped up opposition to industrial development in this remote
and pristine region. The issue of Indigenous agreement by
itself is unlikely to prevent major gas projects from going
ahead, but is an increasingly significant factor in shaping the
region's future. End Summary.



Gas Projects Need Land, Marine Use




2. (U) During a visit to the Kimberley September 28 - October
2, government and business representatives confirmed to the
Consul General that Indigenous consent to use land and fishing
grounds is a key issue for projects to proceed. Almost a third
of the total LNG projects targeted for northern Australia are
located off the Kimberley coast, worth an estimated A$60 billion
(US$54 billion)(ref A). Key U.S. and OECD oil and gas
companies, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, Apache, Shell, BHP
Billiton, BP, Inpex, and Woodside, are actively exploring in the
region, with projects at various stages of development.



Strong Culture and Land Rights




3. (SBU) While numerically small (some 17,000),Indigenous
people make up half of the Kimberley population (compared to 4
percent state-wide, and 3 percent nationally),retaining strong
traditional customs and spiritual ties to the land. Represented
by the Kimberley Land Council (KLC),Indigenous communities have
gained recognition of their traditional land ownership under

Australia's Native Title legislation of 1992. This includes the
port town of Broome (the only feasible industrial supply base
for the region),and the James Price Point area on the coast,
where Woodside and the Western Australian (WA) state government
have proposed an on-shore LNG processing hub. (Note: Native
Title determinations enable traditional owners to consent and
negotiate over use of land, but do not confer legal title to the
land. End Note.)



Split Views of Gas Projects




4. (SBU) The KLC in April 2009 signed an ambitious preliminary
agreement with Woodside and the WA state government agreeing to
land and marine access for the proposed on-shore LNG hub at
James Price Point 60 kilometers north of Broome in exchange for
education, training, and other commercial benefits. During our
visit to the site in September, KLC leaders said they believe
economic benefits from the gas developments should reach all
Indigenous communities in the Kimberley, not just the local
community that has Native Title recognition. Faced with

PERTH 00000051 002.2 OF 002


opposition to the gas projects from some traditional owners over
a mix of economic, environmental and spiritual issues, the KLC
is seeking a profit-sharing arrangement to encourage buy-in from
as many Kimberley communities as possible, according to senior
WA government Indigenous affairs official Gary Hamley. The KLC
hopes to leverage this agreement to pressure the federal
government (which is reassessing its model of service delivery
to Indigenous communities (Septel))to provide a package of
improved social services, like housing and education.



Deep Concern From Indigenous Communities




5. (SBU) Many Indigenous communities remain deeply concerned
that the gas developments will have a negative impact on
traditional culture. Several Indigenous elders commented on the
"deep anxiety" among remote communities who feel pressured to
consent in order to survive, but say they have little
information, either from the KLC or other stakeholders,
regarding the probable impact on their traditional way of life.
KLC representatives have publicly stated they feel they are
negotiating "with a gun to their heads," reflecting perceived
pressure from business and government.



International Focus on Environment




6. (SBU) International environmental non-governmental
organizations (ENGOs),including the World Wildlife Foundation
and the Australian Wilderness Society, support Indigenous
concerns and have stepped up their opposition to the gas
developments. One Indigenous community has teamed up with music
celebrities like Missy Higgins to focus international attention
on the "Save the Kimberley" campaign. Local government
officials told us that about 20 percent of residents actively
oppose the developments, with some fearing that on-shore LNG
processing will lead to broader industrial development that
could include exporting uranium from the region. A senior
Chevron official from the Gorgon Gas project said corporate
officials are watching ENGO activities in the Kimberley
carefully because ENGOs have not yet focused attention on the
massive Gorgon project, located further west(Ref B).



Comment: Gas Projects Likely, But When?




7. (SBU) There is growing acceptance in Australia that
Indigenous communities should share in the economic growth
associated with the exploitation of the nation's natural
resources like gas. Business and government confirmed that
Indigenous issues are among the top three obstacles to overcome
in developing Kimberley gas projects (the other two are
environmental issues and the remote location of the off-shore
reserves). Indigenous concerns are more likely to prevent
Kimberley gas projects from going forward than elsewhere in
Australia, and have already influenced potential investors, such
as Inpex (a major oil and gas company),to build an LNG
processing plant in the Northern Territory instead of the
Kimberley region, as was originally planned.
CHERN