Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PARISFR705
2009-05-27 16:02:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Mission UNESCO
Cable title:  

GROUP ONE MEETING 20 MAY 2009

Tags:  TPHY SCUL UNESCO 
pdf how-to read a cable
UNCLASSIFIED   UNESCOPARI   05270705 
VZCZCXYZ0010
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #0705 1471602
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 271602Z MAY 09
FM UNESCO PARIS FR
TO SECSTATE WASHDC
UNCLAS PARIS FR 000705 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NOAA JACK DUNNIGAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TPHY SCUL UNESCO
SUBJECT: GROUP ONE MEETING 20 MAY 2009

UNCLAS PARIS FR 000705

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NOAA JACK DUNNIGAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TPHY SCUL UNESCO
SUBJECT: GROUP ONE MEETING 20 MAY 2009


1. Summary: The May 20 meeting of UNESCO's regional electoral
Group I (Western Europe and North America) laid bare some of the
horse-trading that occurs in obtaining seats connected to the
various committees, commissions, and Conventions at UNESCO. Italy
proposed that Group I trade with Group II (Russia and Eastern
Europe) a seat on Inter-governmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC)
Executive Council for a seat on the treaty body of the 2005
Convention on the Protection of the Diversity of Cultural
Expressions. The U.S. blocked consensus on the idea at this
meeting, but Canada and others argued that Group I will eventually
have to deal with Group II's demand for more seats on the IOC
Executive Council. End summary.


2. The key issue during the Group I meeting centered on the ASPAC -
Asia Pacific Electoral Group's - request via letter to the
Director-General through the ADG for Culture, Francoise Riviere, for
Group I to "return" a seat on the Cultural Diversity Convention's
treaty body that had been "loaned" for two years to Group I. The
Convention allocates three seats to each group. Group I currently
has five seats on the Convention's Committee.


3. Complicating the matter was a letter from Group II asking that
the Director-General find a way to increase the number of seats
Group II has on the IOC Executive Council. (Note: Group II now has
two seats on the Council, compared to 11 seats for Group I. End
note).


4. The meeting Chair, Italian Ambassador Giuseppe Moscato, asked
Group I members how he should respond to the ASPAC letter, saying
that he anticipated a possible battle with the Indian ambassador if
there were any problems concerning the request. France's
ambassador, Ms. Colonna, said that Group I must return the seat,
adding that it would be in the Group's "political interest," and its
only chance to get seats in the future.


5. Moscato announced that he would circulate a draft reply to the
D-G through Ms. Riviere saying that the Group had "taken note" of
ASPAC's letter, while opening a discussion with the ASPAC Group's
chairman to see what other options might be possible in a wider seat
swapping arrangement.


6. Regarding the IOC, Moscato observed that Group I now has 11
seats, and only 10 candidates, making it appear to be a simple
decision to use the extra seat for trading to other Groups. He
added that, given the need for the General Conference to change the
IOC's rules of procedure to accommodate such a shift of seats, the
redivision of seats could not take effect until after the 36th
session of the General Conference in 2011. However, the U.S.
Charge, Stephen Engelken, told the Group that he would not join in
consensus to resolve the seat swaps without instruction from
Washington. He told the Group that "any decision about giving up
seats on the IOC must be determined based on what is best for the
IOC." Engelken added that while we have a large number of seats, it
is important to note that Group I's contribution to IOC (both
financial and in terms of expertise) is also disproportionately
high. Finally, he stressed that the U.S. is not a party to the
Cultural Diversity Convention and that the U.S. is therefore not
interested in whether or not Group I obtains more seats on its
treaty body.


7. The Italian Chair appealed to the Group to "see reality." Group
II will continue to press to rectify the imbalance of seats on the
IOC Executive Council. Canadian Ambassador Laurin said that if we
don't find a solution, e.g. giving up one of the 11 IOC seats in
order to gain a seat for Cultural Diversity, we will probably find
ourselves in a situation later where an ad-hoc committee will impose
a decision on the Group that might be worse. We could lose more
than one seat, and not get anything for it from the other Groups.


8. Norway intervened, saying that the current seat quotas regarding
IOC are not fair, and agreed that we risk losing more than one of
our 11 seats. Turkey said that the Group should negotiate now, or
potentially lose control of things during the General Conference.


9. Things were left in the hands of Ambassador Moscato for the
moment. We anticipate he will raise this issue again before the IOC
Executive Council meeting later in June.
ENGELKEN