Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PARISFR369
2009-03-13 09:40:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Mission UNESCO
how-toUNCLASSIFIEDÂ Â Â UNESCOPARIÂ Â Â 03130369 VZCZCXYZ0001 RR RUEHWEB DE RUEHFR #0369/01 0720940 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 130940Z MAR 09 FM UNESCO PARIS FR TO SECSTATE WASHDC
UNCLAS PARIS FR 000369
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO DEPT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ATTN: STEVE
MORRIS AND JONATHAN PUTNAM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC SCULUNESCO
SUBJECT: WORLD HERITAGE BUDGET MEETING
UNCLAS PARIS FR 000369
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO DEPT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ATTN: STEVE
MORRIS AND JONATHAN PUTNAM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC SCULUNESCO
SUBJECT: WORLD HERITAGE BUDGET MEETING
1. (U) Summary. In conjunction with meetings on the Future of the
World Heritage (WH) Convention and on the WH emblem (septels),
UNESCO convened an experts meeting on the WH budget on February 24.
Discussion consisted largely of a review of familiar ideas with
little progress made. WH Chair Ambassador Maria San Segundo of
Spain proposed creation of a budget working group modeled on the
existing working group on the WH emblem to deal with issue. The
U.S. was represented by Steve Morris and Jonathan Putnam from the
National Park Service at the Department of the Interior. David
Ostroff accompanied them from the U.S. Mission staff. End Summary.
Budget Issues - Far from Decided
2. (U) The budget meeting was chaired by Ambassador Maria San
Segundo, (Spain) in her capacity as chairman of the WH Committee.
She indicated that the meeting was a follow-up to discussions of the
lunchtime, informal working group on the budget held during the last
Committee meeting in Quebec. The WH Center's Director, Francesco
Bandarin, attempted to channel discussions unsuccessfully on issues
like exchange rate problems. After participants complained about a
lack of sufficient information as well as a lack of broader vision,
many suggested that the meeting be delayed until the "Future of the
WH Convention" meeting later in the week had been held.
3. (U) Mr. Bandarin's overview of the WH Center's budget left some
with the impression that things were intentionally kept a bit vague.
Bandarin said that there has been a 33 percent decrease in the
budget from 2002-2003 biennium, dropping from $10 million to $7.2
million. (He indicated that the decrease was due to spending down
the reserves following a decision by the Committee to that effect.)
He noted that the fixed contributions of the WH Fund, made up of one
percent of each Member State's contribution to UNESCO, remain stable
at $6.5 million per biennium.
4. (U) Bandarin said that the WH Fund counts on an additional
$400,000 to $600,000 per biennium in income from earmarked extra
budgetary funds, accrued interest, and royalties from the use of the
WH logo. He also mentioned that he would like to increase
"contingency reserves" from $700,000 to $1 million to help gap cash
flow problems at the beginning of each cycle, which has obliged the
Advisory Bodies to advance their own funds for up to seven months at
the start of each budget cycle. He also asked to shift the
contracts for the Advisory Bodies from August to July of each year
to help ease the problems related to UNESCO cash flows. Bandarin
also noted a decrease in funding due to the U.S. dollar/Euro
exchange rate fluctuation though the immediacy of the problem had
diminished in recent months with the growing strength of the dollar.
5. (U) Australia noted that the States Parties hadn't addressed the
issue of static resources and the increasing number of properties on
the WH List. Bahrain said that there is a "lack of commitment" by
States Parties to fund the WH Center's work properly. Several
States Parties complained about the lack of transparency, and said
that it was necessary for the WH Committee to be well-briefed.
Bandarin said that many of the budget concerns are linked to the
"big questions" that would be dealt with during the "Future of the
WH Convention" meeting held the next day. Others questioned the
relatively small percentage of its budget that UNESCO gives to the
WH Center, asking why its flagship program does not receive more
funding.
6. (U) Other ideas were raised, including charging according to a
sliding scale based on the number of sites per country, or a fixed
percentage per site. Israel gave the example of Ethiopia, which has
eight sites, and pays only $92 per year to the WH Fund. It was
suggested that an additional 10 percent would not be stressful to
the poorest countries, but could add up to real money for more
developed nations. Bandarin noted that the WH Committee had
previously rejected such proposals or the idea of a $300 minimum
contribution. Bandarin noted that over one half of the WH Center's
staff is paid through extra budgetary funding, and suggested that
one possible solution to the growing workload would be to
decentralize the work to other parts of the world.
7. (U) Another solution suggested was to develop regional WH funds,
like the Africa Fund, which has already been created and has
received several million dollars in donations. Chairman San Segundo
mentioned that a similar regional fund is being planned for Asia
(ASPAC),adding that it is up to us to be sure that all monies are
used efficiently.
8. (U) The U.S. delegation, among others, complained that we don't
yet have a clear idea about where we are going, and lack necessary
preparation for this discussion. The U.S. said it would be
interested in seeking an increase from the UNESCO regular budget for
the WH Center. Morocco, in turn, said that it would be problematic
to reduce funds available for other UNESCO programs. Israel noted
that we shouldn't be in the position of muddling through every year,
dependent on extra budgetary funds, and that we should be
investigating how to increase our basic budget.
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO DEPT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ATTN: STEVE
MORRIS AND JONATHAN PUTNAM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC SCULUNESCO
SUBJECT: WORLD HERITAGE BUDGET MEETING
9. (U) Australia summed up the concerns well, saying that this is a
multi-faceted problem that requires multi-faceted solutions. In
order to move forward, we need to know what things cost. It's not
only a question of deciding how to cut up the pie, but needing to
make the pie bigger. Bandarin said that he would make an effort to
get more information to the working group, but that the deadlines
would make it difficult to present more information in the short
timeframe before the next round of meetings. Chairman San Segundo
decided that the best way to move forward was to create a working
group, and suggested that, like the working group regarding use of
the WH emblem, the budget working group could meet again in mid-May
in conjunction with the next information and preparatory meeting for
the Seville WH Committee meeting. ENGELKEN
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO DEPT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ATTN: STEVE
MORRIS AND JONATHAN PUTNAM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC SCULUNESCO
SUBJECT: WORLD HERITAGE BUDGET MEETING
1. (U) Summary. In conjunction with meetings on the Future of the
World Heritage (WH) Convention and on the WH emblem (septels),
UNESCO convened an experts meeting on the WH budget on February 24.
Discussion consisted largely of a review of familiar ideas with
little progress made. WH Chair Ambassador Maria San Segundo of
Spain proposed creation of a budget working group modeled on the
existing working group on the WH emblem to deal with issue. The
U.S. was represented by Steve Morris and Jonathan Putnam from the
National Park Service at the Department of the Interior. David
Ostroff accompanied them from the U.S. Mission staff. End Summary.
Budget Issues - Far from Decided
2. (U) The budget meeting was chaired by Ambassador Maria San
Segundo, (Spain) in her capacity as chairman of the WH Committee.
She indicated that the meeting was a follow-up to discussions of the
lunchtime, informal working group on the budget held during the last
Committee meeting in Quebec. The WH Center's Director, Francesco
Bandarin, attempted to channel discussions unsuccessfully on issues
like exchange rate problems. After participants complained about a
lack of sufficient information as well as a lack of broader vision,
many suggested that the meeting be delayed until the "Future of the
WH Convention" meeting later in the week had been held.
3. (U) Mr. Bandarin's overview of the WH Center's budget left some
with the impression that things were intentionally kept a bit vague.
Bandarin said that there has been a 33 percent decrease in the
budget from 2002-2003 biennium, dropping from $10 million to $7.2
million. (He indicated that the decrease was due to spending down
the reserves following a decision by the Committee to that effect.)
He noted that the fixed contributions of the WH Fund, made up of one
percent of each Member State's contribution to UNESCO, remain stable
at $6.5 million per biennium.
4. (U) Bandarin said that the WH Fund counts on an additional
$400,000 to $600,000 per biennium in income from earmarked extra
budgetary funds, accrued interest, and royalties from the use of the
WH logo. He also mentioned that he would like to increase
"contingency reserves" from $700,000 to $1 million to help gap cash
flow problems at the beginning of each cycle, which has obliged the
Advisory Bodies to advance their own funds for up to seven months at
the start of each budget cycle. He also asked to shift the
contracts for the Advisory Bodies from August to July of each year
to help ease the problems related to UNESCO cash flows. Bandarin
also noted a decrease in funding due to the U.S. dollar/Euro
exchange rate fluctuation though the immediacy of the problem had
diminished in recent months with the growing strength of the dollar.
5. (U) Australia noted that the States Parties hadn't addressed the
issue of static resources and the increasing number of properties on
the WH List. Bahrain said that there is a "lack of commitment" by
States Parties to fund the WH Center's work properly. Several
States Parties complained about the lack of transparency, and said
that it was necessary for the WH Committee to be well-briefed.
Bandarin said that many of the budget concerns are linked to the
"big questions" that would be dealt with during the "Future of the
WH Convention" meeting held the next day. Others questioned the
relatively small percentage of its budget that UNESCO gives to the
WH Center, asking why its flagship program does not receive more
funding.
6. (U) Other ideas were raised, including charging according to a
sliding scale based on the number of sites per country, or a fixed
percentage per site. Israel gave the example of Ethiopia, which has
eight sites, and pays only $92 per year to the WH Fund. It was
suggested that an additional 10 percent would not be stressful to
the poorest countries, but could add up to real money for more
developed nations. Bandarin noted that the WH Committee had
previously rejected such proposals or the idea of a $300 minimum
contribution. Bandarin noted that over one half of the WH Center's
staff is paid through extra budgetary funding, and suggested that
one possible solution to the growing workload would be to
decentralize the work to other parts of the world.
7. (U) Another solution suggested was to develop regional WH funds,
like the Africa Fund, which has already been created and has
received several million dollars in donations. Chairman San Segundo
mentioned that a similar regional fund is being planned for Asia
(ASPAC),adding that it is up to us to be sure that all monies are
used efficiently.
8. (U) The U.S. delegation, among others, complained that we don't
yet have a clear idea about where we are going, and lack necessary
preparation for this discussion. The U.S. said it would be
interested in seeking an increase from the UNESCO regular budget for
the WH Center. Morocco, in turn, said that it would be problematic
to reduce funds available for other UNESCO programs. Israel noted
that we shouldn't be in the position of muddling through every year,
dependent on extra budgetary funds, and that we should be
investigating how to increase our basic budget.
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO DEPT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ATTN: STEVE
MORRIS AND JONATHAN PUTNAM
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC SCULUNESCO
SUBJECT: WORLD HERITAGE BUDGET MEETING
9. (U) Australia summed up the concerns well, saying that this is a
multi-faceted problem that requires multi-faceted solutions. In
order to move forward, we need to know what things cost. It's not
only a question of deciding how to cut up the pie, but needing to
make the pie bigger. Bandarin said that he would make an effort to
get more information to the working group, but that the deadlines
would make it difficult to present more information in the short
timeframe before the next round of meetings. Chairman San Segundo
decided that the best way to move forward was to create a working
group, and suggested that, like the working group regarding use of
the WH emblem, the budget working group could meet again in mid-May
in conjunction with the next information and preparatory meeting for
the Seville WH Committee meeting. ENGELKEN