Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PARIS330
2009-03-06 11:23:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Paris
Cable title:  

The Standing Group for Global Energy Dialogue, February

Tags:  ECON EFIN ENRG EPET IEA OECD 
pdf how-to read a cable
UNCLAS PARIS 00330
BRUSSECX:
 ACTION: ECON UECON
 INFO: PAO UDCM UCUST UFCS PR POL UPAO UNAS UPOL UAGR
 UAMB DCM FCS AMB UAID DAO

DISSEMINATION: ECON
CHARGE: PROG

VZCZCBSO630
RR RUEHBS
DE RUEHFR #0330/01 0651123
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 061123Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5698
INFO RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0519
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 6309
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0623
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0429
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 0118
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1935
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 2183
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 0714
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 1299
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 1737
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000330 

DEPT PLEASE PASS TO DOE
FROM USOECD

TAGS: ECON EFIN ENRG EPET IEA OECD
SUBJECT: The Standing Group for Global Energy Dialogue, February
25-26, 2009

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000330

DEPT PLEASE PASS TO DOE
FROM USOECD

TAGS: ECON EFIN ENRG EPET IEA OECD
SUBJECT: The Standing Group for Global Energy Dialogue, February
25-26, 2009


1. Summary: The International Energy Agency's Standing Group for
Global Energy Dialogue (SGD) met February 25-26 in Paris to discuss
to review a range of outreach work to non-IEA countries, to discuss
the activities of other energy organizations, and to discuss next
steps for the IEA. Topics included the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute,
participation of Russia/China/India in the upcoming March Governing
Board meeting, reporting on the Gas Exporting Countries Forum (also
referred to as GOPEC),the Secretariat's proposal "Winds of Change"
on options for new relations between the IEA and non-member
countries; and outreach to new geographic regions including ASEAN,
Central Asia and Latin America. Finally, the group discussed the
participation of Russia, China and India at the Ministerial to be
held in the fall and possible outcomes and joint statements. End
Summary.


2. December London Producer-Consumer Meeting: The Secretariat gave
a detailed read on the December London P/C meeting and the way
forward. The focus was on the Steering group expert Group dynamic,
which is moving slowly. The steering group is supposed to pick an
expert group and the terms of reference for that group but it was
still not clear how the steering group itself would work (discussion
took place before circulation of email from IEFS and Mexico chair
that added more clarification on the steering group). The objective
of the expert group was to identify ways to make the producer
consumer process operate more effectively and possibly develop new
architecture. The IEA Secretariat noted that the new IEFS Executive
director wants to increase resources and expand IEFS activities.
IEA s engagement and monitoring of IEF process was welcomed by
delegates.


3. Russia-Ukraine Gas Dispute: The Secretariat gave a detailed
chronology of the gas crisis as it unfolded over the first half of
January, as well as a review of events leading up to that dispute.
With the benefit of some good luck and some good juggling and
cooperation among consuming countries, Europe was able to cope with
a few exceptions. The crisis did reinforce the importance of key
energy security mantras -- more storage, reduced internal barriers
and diversification. However, the clear message from Secretariat as

well as the EU rep, who served as one of the EU monitors of gas
flows in January, was that, notwithstanding the deal that got gas
flowing again, this problem is far from over. In fact, under terms
of the deal, Ukraine must pay for monthly gas shipments by the March
7, 2009. There are serious concerns that Ukraine will be unable to
make its March 7 payment. Despite Ukraine's extreme predicament,
there was no optimism that Ukraine is ready to undertake basic
reforms necessary to enhance its energy security. With Naftogaz on
the verge of bankruptcy, possible outcomes include formation of a
gas consortium, or something akin to the situation in Belarus, where
Russia owns the pipelines. (Currently, however, the pipeline
infrastructure cannot be sold.) For now, the question is whether
Ukraine will make its March 7 payment to Gazprom. Finally, the IEA
and Polish delegates confirmed that gas shipments to Poland were
still below the contracted amount.


4. Gas Exporting Countries Forum (GECF, though colloquially
referred to as GOPEC): The Secretariat's analysis of the recently
established GECF to be based in Doha is that it has no direction or
vocation at this point and will be operating more as a dialogue
shop. In the Secretariat's view, current market conditions and the
fundamental differences in the gas market versus the global oil
market, make it unlikely the GECF could engage in effective
manipulation of markets along the lines of OPEC. Delegates welcomed
the IEA's active watching brief on the GECF but did not see a need
for acute concern.


5. Ministerial and China, India, Russia Participation:
Preparations for the October Ministerial are linked to how the IEA
proceeds with outreach with its top three priority countries. The
Secretariat used this SGD meeting to throw out key questions that
the March Governing Board (GB) meeting will have to address.
Central questions are: Should there be a communique with just the
28 IEA members or should there be a 28 plus 3 communique? How
extensively and what process should be used for engaging the partner
countries in the communique negotiation and finalizing the
Ministerial agenda?


6. The GB will also be asked to take a position on three separate
draft bilateral Joint Statements for possible negotiation and
signature with each of the partners; the Secretariat circulated
these as room documents during the meeting and they largely codify
past and proposed future cooperation as well as idea of a notional
commitment to attend at least one GB a year in future. Finally the
GB will be asked to give guidance on a proposal for announcement at
Ministerial of the establishment of a training and development
center at the October Ministerial.


7. SGD delegates were open to idea of pursuing a 28-plus communique
but recognized that may involve more watering down than acceptable.
Regarding the training center, US and Canada raised questions about
analysis behind this proposal and noted that the GB would likely
need much more info before it could make an informed decision.


8. Winds of Change: In response to a request from last December's
GB, the Secretariat presented a lengthy discussion paper on the
Options for New Relations between the IEA and non-Member countries.
There was widespread concern among delegates that this paper was
creating impression that the IEA was in a rush toward precipitous
decisions. There was particular concern about the IEA broaching
issue of a G-20 energy body. The IEA agreed to try to eliminate
this tone and make clear that our outreach ambitions will be limited
by the political willingness of other parties to engage, and would
specifically drop wording suggesting that IEA was engaged in
developing options for new fora to address global energy issues.


9. Other Activities: The Secretariat is continuing its increased
focus on Southeast Asia and the Caspian brief remains very active
with an IEA team heading to Turkmenistan in early April for
discussions on natural gas. Latin America is also another priority
with the upcoming review of Chile and a push from Spain was backed
by the US and Canada to make Latin America a special theme for a
future SGD meeting.
STONE