Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09OSLO576
2009-09-18 14:00:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:  

FRANK NORWEGIAN OPINIONS ON OUR UNGA PRIORITIES

Tags:  PREL UNGA FAO EFIN AORC EAGR EAID KUNR KPKO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0003
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0576/01 2611400
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 181400Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7800
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0332
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000576 

SIPDIS

FOR IO/UNP (SUN) AND EUR (ELDRIDGE)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/18/2019
TAGS: PREL UNGA FAO EFIN AORC EAGR EAID KUNR KPKO
UN, NO
SUBJECT: FRANK NORWEGIAN OPINIONS ON OUR UNGA PRIORITIES
AND THE FAO

REF: A. STATE 90254

B. STATE 96467

Classified By: Political/Economic Counselor Cherrie Daniels for reasons
1.4(b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000576

SIPDIS

FOR IO/UNP (SUN) AND EUR (ELDRIDGE)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/18/2019
TAGS: PREL UNGA FAO EFIN AORC EAGR EAID KUNR KPKO
UN, NO
SUBJECT: FRANK NORWEGIAN OPINIONS ON OUR UNGA PRIORITIES
AND THE FAO

REF: A. STATE 90254

B. STATE 96467

Classified By: Political/Economic Counselor Cherrie Daniels for reasons
1.4(b) and (d)


1. (C) Summary: Poloff met on September 18 with Lars Petter
Henie, Deputy Chief of the UN Section of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA) to discuss reftel A on our UNGA
priorities and reftel B on FAO zero nominal growth. Henie
was very frank in the discussion. He found the food security
conference organized by the USG on September 14-15 to be not
particularly useful for Norway. He said Norway would support
zero nominal growth for the FAO, as the organization seems
incapable of reform under Jacques Diouf. And he generally
agreed with our UNGA priorities, especially on peacekeeping,
gender based violence, UN reform, global health issues, and
disarmament. After his recent consultations in Washington
with the NSC, Henie said he was a bit concerned that the
United States wanted quick results from the UN and ran the
risk of disappointment and frustration. End Summary.

FOOD SECURITY CONFUSION
--------------


2. (C) Henie started off by commenting on a food security
conference hosted by the USG that took place on September
14-15. He described the meeting, which he attended, as not
particularly useful for Norway. First, he said, the
organizers had not coordinated the meeting with the
ministerial meeting being arranged by the Secretary next week
in New York. Second, he said that countries were asked to
give binding pledges for food security and define their
contributions, but the people in attendance were only at the
senior official level and could not possibly make these
decisions. Third, and as a more general matter, he said that
an issue the U.S. will have to address in our food security
intiative(s) is that it seems as if no one knows exactly how

much money is being spent on "food security" because the term
remains undefined. He said that the $20 billion figure used
at L'Aquila is meaningless because "no one knows what these
dollar amounts signify." He emphasized that even the most
senior officials in charge of food aid collected at the
September 14-15 meeting did not know what their governments
were spending on "food security" projects of one sort or
another. Henie said that the U.S. would do the world "a
great service" if we could bring clarity to these issues.
(Note: The MFA International Development Section did try to
develop such figures after a US Embassy demarche in late
August. Those figures were passed to EUR/ERA on September
16.)

AGREEMENT ON THE "BROKEN" FAO
--------------


3. (C) Henie said he can easily agree on our points in ref B
regarding the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
For Norway, he said, zero nominal growth is not an end in
itself, but Norway currently sees little that is positive
happening at the FAO. Henie said that Norway would make no
more voluntary contributions to the FAO budget designed to
"jump start" the reform process. When asked what the FAO's
most significant problem is, Henie replied, "two words:
Jacques Diouf." Director-General Diouf's attitude, said
Henie, is "if you want reform, you can pay for it." Norway
believes that the FAO needs to be modernized and must work
more programatically. "Having 1700 key staff on short term
contracts is not conducive either to results or long term
planning," Henie said. Norway will no longer engage in or
encourage other countries to engage in "soft earmarking" of
funds for the FAO, as Norway has lost hope that the FAO can
reform itself under its current leadership. Henie said that
Norway's two year program cooperation agreement ends this
year, and it will not be renewed until 2011 for 2012
implementation, "when Diouf is gone."

POSITIVITY ON OUR UNGA AND BROADER UN PRIORITIES
-------------- ---


4. (C) Henie said that he had already reviewed our UN
priorities with a senior official whom he described as
"Director of the Multilateral Office at the NSC," and Norway
was interested to see what the President's "priorities among
the priorities" would turn out to be. However, as a general
matter, in response to our demarche in ref A, he said that
Norway and the United States have "very much the same
priorities." He listed five areas of high interest to
Norway: (1) Peacekeeping and peace building operations in
failed states--Henie said that President Obama's upcoming

meeting on troop contributions is an unprecedented strong
signal that this administration takes peacekeeping seriously.
Henie mused that a possible offer of lift capacity and
helicopters by the United States would be very, very
interesting. (2) The protection of civilians--gender based
violence, and women and children caught up in conflict. (3)
UN reform--Henie said that the fact that the U.S. paid its UN
bill on time this year puts it in a stronger position to
strongly advocate for reform. Henie also commented that the
recent U.S. suggestion that a Special Representative of the
Secretary-General for violence against women be appointed was
a clear signal that the U.S. is open to the idea that
sometimes, projects that will expand UN spending are OK. (4)
Global health issues. (5) Disarmament--Henie said he hoped
the Obama administration could "kickstart" negotiations on
nuclear disarmament, and the U.S. was sending "very positive
signals" which will produce "new opportunities."

"GIVE IT SOME TIME"
--------------


5. (C) Henie repeated twice during the conversation that he
was somewhat worried that, in the enthusiasm to re-engage
with the UN, the U.S. ran the risk of becoming frustrated by
the body. "I'm getting the sense that the U.S. wants quick
results," he said. Henie commented that some things, such as
progress on disarmament, peacekeeping, and gender based
violence, could be achieved relatively quickly through U.S.
initiatives. But other areas, like UN reform, would be
inherently slower.


6. (C) Comment: Henie is a straight shooter with no illusions
about the UN's operation or efficacy. His attitude was one
of concern on our handling of our food security initiative.
It was clear that he was disappointed by what he
characterized as our lack of interagency coordination on the
message, be he expressed hope that the upcoming ministerial
level meeting on the subject on the margins of UNGA (to which
Foreign Minister Stoere has still not yet firmly RSVP'd) will
help to clarify what we are asking for, and what the term
"food security" does and does not mean.
HEG