Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09MOSCOW3123
2009-12-28 14:12:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Moscow
Cable title:  

CHANGING ROLES IN THE TANDEM LEADERSHIP

Tags:  PREL PGOV PMAR PHUM PINR ECON EFIN RS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6427
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHMO #3123/01 3621412
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 281412Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5807
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MOSCOW 003123 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV PMAR PHUM PINR ECON EFIN RS
SUBJECT: CHANGING ROLES IN THE TANDEM LEADERSHIP

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Susan M. Elliott; reasons 1
.4(b/d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MOSCOW 003123

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV PMAR PHUM PINR ECON EFIN RS
SUBJECT: CHANGING ROLES IN THE TANDEM LEADERSHIP

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Susan M. Elliott; reasons 1
.4(b/d).


1. (C) Recent changes in the public messages and actions of
President Medvedev have led to increased uncertainty among
regional authorities and bureaucrats. Medvedev's recent
decisions to dismiss officials in response to public outcries
over the Perm nightclub tragedy and remove prison officials
implicated in the death of Sergey Magnitskiy is a contrast to
Putin's professed reluctance to sack people. Some observers
are beginning to attribute Medvedev's decisive actions as a
change in the vertical power structure of the Tandem. While
the tone and substance of public pronouncements may be
changing, the key themes in the coordinated messages of both
Medvedev and Putin remain relatively the same. End Summary.



2. (C) In recent weeks, prominent political observers have
commented on modifications to the division of labor between
President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin. Medvedev has
mainly concentrated on matters under his control, especially
foreign policy. Putin has tended to the economy, broadly
defined, including the interests of major state corporations
such as Gazprom. Exceptions to this division involved Putin
more than Medvedev, notably Putin's personal involvement in
the Russia-Georgia war. Pundits have observed that the
tandem's division of labor is changing. Medvedev spends time
on issues that have in the past been the proviso of the PM,
and vice versa. Improved bilateral relations with the US have
strengthened Medvedev's credibility in the foreign policy
arena.


3. (C) Since the September printing of his article "Russia
Forward!", Medvedev has changed, at least rhetorically, the
national debate to a forward-looking assessment of Russia's
long-term problems. Prior to this, Prime Minister Putin took
the lead on proposing changes to the economic and social
systems. Many experts, however, downplay Medvedev's ability
to implement reforms to a system that serves the interests of

elites, including Medvedev and Putin themselves.


4. (C) While it does not appear that the Tandem leadership is
contemplating radical change, the national and regional
bureaucracies are responding to the new signals they are
receiving from Putin and Medvedev. Tatyana Stanovaya of the
Center for Political Technologies told us December 21 that
several recent developments have left regional elites
confused. Medvedev's swift dismissals of Perm oblast
officials following the night club fire was consistent with
his propensity to sack officials for incompetence. Stanovaya
cited another example of mixed signals -- the dispute between
the Kremlin and the White House over tax legislation under
consideration by the Duma. The rejection of proposals from
Medvedev's economic advisor Arkadiy Dvorkovich in favor of
White House proposals, she contended, demonstrated that
regional elites cannot count on the Kremlin to get them what
they need. This dissonance has led regional officials to
carefully consider how to respond to orders from the Kremlin.
They realize that failures can lead to loss of position, but
successes may not translate into rewards.


5. (C) In spite of his public pledges to fight corruption,
few people believe Medvedev will be successful in reducing
corruption. The ongoing conflict between General Prosecutor
(GP) Yuriy Chaika and Investigative Committee (SK) Chief
Sergey Bastrykhin flared again before Christmas with the GP's
dismissal of an SK Moscow-level official. Bastrykhin, an
ally of Putin, successfully defended his subordinate,
compelling Medvedev-ally Chaika to back off. The daily
newspaper "Kommersant" described this as a clear loss for
Chaika, further muddying the signals to bureaucrats
throughout the country as to how effective Medvedev will be
in the implementation of his anti-corruption ideas.



6. (C) Stanovaya and "New Times" editor Yevgeniya Albats
speculated that the mixed messages were leading to government
gridlock. Foundation for Effective Politics expert Pavel
Danilin, however, attributed this process to normal
governance disagreements present in any democratic system.
Danilin said that he and his boss, Kremlin-insider Gleb
Pavlovskiy, perceive no major differences between Medvedev
and Putin, only minor policy disputes between the staffs of
the two leaders. He predicted that an amicable split in the
tandem will come, but much closer to the 2012 presidential
elections. The two are functioning well together and continue
to exercise complete political and executive control. During

MOSCOW 00003123 002 OF 002


a televised interview on December 24, Medvedev said his
relationship with Putin remains "friendly" and will not
change. While there are undoubtedly differences in the tone
and substance of public pronouncements, it is also clear that
key themes in the messages of both Medvedev and Putin are
well coordinated.

Comment
--------------


7. (C) In recent weeks liberal commentators have rescinded
some of their previous criticism of Medvedev, citing his
decisive steps in removing prison officials implicated in the
death of the lawyer Sergey Magnitskiy and firing officials
responsible for fire safety in Perm. No one discerns any
significant or widening policy gaps between Medvedev and
Putin. Rather, their good cop/bad cop coordination seems to
be working at the national level, with their public approval
rating remaining high. For regional bureaucrats accustomed
to paying more attention to decisions from the White House,
Medvedev has shaken things up and caused regional officials
to rethink their personnel and administrative calculations.
That seems exactly what he intended -- to improve his image
as a decisive leader and strengthen his own longer-term
political ambitions.
Rubin