Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09MOSCOW2548
2009-10-08 11:42:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Moscow
Cable title:  

GOR CLAIMS DIPLOMATIC COURIERS IN KABUL OBSTRUCTED

Tags:  PGOV PREL ADPM ASEC RS AF 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMO #2548 2811142
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 081142Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5037
INFO RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL IMMEDIATE 0659
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 002548 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/08/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL ADPM ASEC RS AF
SUBJECT: GOR CLAIMS DIPLOMATIC COURIERS IN KABUL OBSTRUCTED

Classified By: Acting Political M/C David Kostelancik. Reasons 1.4 (b)
and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 002548

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/08/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL ADPM ASEC RS AF
SUBJECT: GOR CLAIMS DIPLOMATIC COURIERS IN KABUL OBSTRUCTED

Classified By: Acting Political M/C David Kostelancik. Reasons 1.4 (b)
and (d).


1. (C) On October 8, MFA North American Desk Second Secretary
Sergey Kuznetsov passed us a nonpaper detailing GOR
complaints that their diplomatic couriers in Kabul were
stopped and searched by a private security firm at Kabul
Arport on October 5. He added that FM Lavrov may raise this
issue with the Secretary during their October 13 meeting.
The GOR, he said, demanded a full investigation into this
incident.


2. (SBU) Begin unofficial translation of nonpaper:

Staff of the U.S. private security protection company Global,
which, under agreement with the Afghan side, ensures security
of freight and passenger air carriage, created obstacles to
free access of diplomatic cargo to aircraft at the Kabul
international airport on October 5, 2009, when diplomatic
pouch was being carried from Kabul to Moscow via Ariana air
carrier FG-707.

In particular, R. Edwards, an employee of the company in
question, demanded that the diplomatic cargo go through an
X-ray check. Following a protest and lengthy arguing,
consular officers managed to convince Mr. Edwards that his
actions were unlawful and violated Article 27 of the Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations and prevent the checking
of diplomatic freight. After that, however, Mr. Edwards,
citing instructions from his superiors, which, in his
opinion, override any requirements of international rules,
demanded that personal examination of the diplomatic couriers
be conducted in the general area of the airport, motivating
that by the need to ensure flight safety. Because for
conducting such a check the couriers had to leave the cargo
in the baggage checking area, the possibility of dispatching
the pouch was made questionable. The diplomatic couriers
were accompanied in turns to the personal check area, after
which Mr. Edwards gave his permission to continue delivering
diplomatic cargo to the aircraft.

In addition, when the diplomatic cargo was being placed in a
container to be transported to the aircraft, the same Global
representative ordered the diplomatic pouch to be checked by
a dog. When consular officers and couriers protested
categorically, he said that the dog should not be stopped
when working or it would attack our officers.

The incident happened in spite of the fact that earlier the
Russian Embassy had held meetings with the top management of
this security protection company.

We express our serious concern over the improper conduct of
Global staff members with respect to both diplomatic couriers
and diplomatic personnel of the Russian Embassy in
Afghanistan. Given that the incident is not the first
instance and there have been similar precedents in the past,
we demand that the U.S. side conduct a thorough investigation
of this incident and ensure a generally accepted procedure
for diplomatic pouch in accordance with norms of
international law.

End translation.
Beyrle