Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09LUSAKA583
2009-08-19 12:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Lusaka
Cable title:  

FORMER PRESIDENT CHILUBA ACQUITTED OF CORRUPTION

Tags:  KCOR PGOV ZA 
pdf how-to read a cable
R 191219Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY LUSAKA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 7225
INFO SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP 0166
C O N F I D E N T I A L LUSAKA 000583 


E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/17/2019
TAGS: KCOR PGOV ZA
SUBJECT: FORMER PRESIDENT CHILUBA ACQUITTED OF CORRUPTION
CHARGES

REF: LUSAKA 275

Classified By: Ambassador Donald Booth for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L LUSAKA 000583


E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/17/2019
TAGS: KCOR PGOV ZA
SUBJECT: FORMER PRESIDENT CHILUBA ACQUITTED OF CORRUPTION
CHARGES

REF: LUSAKA 275

Classified By: Ambassador Donald Booth for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) Former Zambian President Frederick Chiluba was
acquitted August 17 of six counts of theft by public servant
totaling USD 500,000. The 445-page judgment, handed down by
Ndola High Court Registrar Jones Chinyama, took over seven
hours to read and ultimately concluded that the prosecution
"failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt."
Chiluba was alleged to have routed Government of the Republic
of Zambia (GRZ) funds through third parties to Access
Financial Services (AFS) accounts controlled by co-defendants
Faustin Kabwe (AFS Chief Executive Officer) and Aaron Chungu
(AFS Director) who were both found guilty of theft and
possession of state funds. The USD 500,000 in question was
allegedly used to pay school fees for Chiluba's children and
to purchase private residences for former ministers Eric
Silwamba (presidential affairs) and Vincent Malambo (legal
affairs). While the acquittal marks the likely end of this
case, which Chiluba's legal antics and health issues helped
drag out over eight years, it is unclear what will happen
with the 2007 United Kingdom high court ruling of a civil
case that found Chiluba and others liable for
misappropriating USD 41 million of GRZ public resources.
That finding, labeled by Chiluba as "racist" and "obscene",
has yet to be registered and enforced in Zambia.


2. (C) Central to the criminal case was the origin of funds
in the secret account known as Zamtrop (which was used by
Zambian intelligence services). Chiluba described in unsworn
testimony earlier this year how his "personal funds" came to
be commingled in the account that was used to pay for the
former ministers' houses. His lawyers previously admitted
that Chiluba put contributions, supposedly collected from
Zambian and international supporters of his ruling Movement
for Multiparty Democracy (MMD),into the Zamtrop account.
Chiluba suggested that he did so at the behest of the former
director general of intelligence, who recommended the money
pass through Zamtrop for security purposes. While the money
used for the homes of Chiluba's former ministers came from
the secret account, the prosecution failed to demonstrate
that the money spent actually belonged to the GRZ. Prior to
the ruling, Embassy contacts suggested that the prosecution

had a very difficult time linking anything directly to
Chiluba, possibly explaining why his cohorts were found
guilty while he was acquitted.


3. (C) The prosecution was unable to directly question
Chiluba about these funds because of Chiluba's decision to
provide unsworn testimony on the matter. While it was
initially believed that his refusal to testify under oath
would weaken his defense, it worked to Chiluba's advantage,
because the prosecution could not cross examine Chiluba about
the specific origins of his funding (Note: Co-defendants
Kabwe and Chungu both provided sworn testimony). Without
being able to specifically prove that the USD 500,000 in
question was stolen from GRZ coffers, the prosecution's case
collapsed. UK lawyers who investigated the 2007 civil case
against Chiluba told PolOff that tey had to redo most of the
testimonies and acquie their own evidence as a result of the
shoddy wrk by the Task Force on Corruption (responsible fo
prosecuting Chiluba, supporting the argument tht the
prosecution failed to present an adequate rgument in a
criminal case where the evidentiarystandard was higher than
for the civil case.


4. (SBU) Chiluba held a defiant press conference after the
verdict was announced during which he described his acquittal
as God's blessing. He suggested that "for eight long years
the devil has tried to put stigma of a thief on me, but God
has dealt with the devil" and chastised "those who would put
their president at the mercy of foreigners." Chiluba
spokesman Emmanuel Mwamba echoed the former president's
anti-Western message, suggesting that "the British in
particular attempted to use this (case) as an example to
Africa. And I'm glad the judiciary in Zambia has refused to
be used for such an international scheme." Chiluba also
cautioned the press "to be careful not to play with God's
anointed people" and promised he would hold a more detailed
press conference in two weeks.


5. (C) Comment: While the ruling is clearly disappointing to
Western donors and those Zambians actively engaged in the
anti-corruption effort, the reaction by everyday Zambians and
the GRZ appears muted so far. Chiluba and his supporters
seem to recognize that it is hard for observers to publicly
criticize the process. He will likely continue playing the
role of persecuted public servant who has been vindicated by
a free and fair judicial system. Despite being found guilty
of separate corruption charges by a UK court, blame is not
likely with Magistrate Chinyama. Prior to the acquittal,
embassy contacts, including Task Force prosecutors, said they
were happy with the way Chinyama handled the case. Chinyama
even told the prosecution that they should have called the
former intelligence chief to testify about the nature of the
funds used to purchase the houses in question. If the GRZ
wanted to ensure that Chiluba was not seen as being above the
law, it could finally register the UK judgment handed down
two years ago and seize the millions owed to it by virtue of
the ruling. Judging from public and GRZ reaction to the
verdict, it seems unlikely the GRZ will give the appearance
of favoring the UK ruling over its own court's exoneration.
Both on principle and for practical reasons (the GRZ needs
the USD 41 million at stake),we will continue to urge the
GRZ to proceed with registering the UK judgment. End
Comment.


BOOTH