Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09LUSAKA245
2009-04-07 14:09:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Lusaka
Cable title:  

PF DROPS ELECTION CHALLENGE

Tags:  PGOV ZA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1665
RR RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHLS #0245 0971409
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 071409Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY LUSAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6899
INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS LUSAKA 000245 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ZA
SUBJECT: PF DROPS ELECTION CHALLENGE

REF: 08 Lusaka 1065

UNCLAS LUSAKA 000245

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ZA
SUBJECT: PF DROPS ELECTION CHALLENGE

REF: 08 Lusaka 1065


1. (U) The Zambian Supreme Court has ruled against the opposition
Patriotic Front (PF) party's petition for a recount of the October
2008 presidential by-election votes. PF leadership and cadres have
accepted the March 11 ruling relatively quietly and abandoned any
appeal, although in usual form, PF President Michael Sata claimed
foul play, speculating that the case outcome had been
"predetermined."


2. (U) The PF's petition challenged the election of President
Rupiah Banda, requesting a recount of votes cast in the by-elections
held on October 30, 2008. Sata alleged that there were
discrepancies between the vote counts at various polling stations
and the totals received at the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ)
Results Centre. PF therefore applied to the court to order a
recount of votes in all the 150 parliamentary constituencies.


3. (U) In its ruling, however, the Supreme Court dismissed the
application on the basis of insufficient evidence. The outcome was
unsurprising to many familiar with the case, who observed the
relative weakness of PF's case during the court proceedings
(reftel). Apart from some written evidence, adduced in affidavits
relating to only 24 constituencies, the party failed to produce any
evidence to support the remaining 126 constituencies. Even for the
24 constituencies, the party failed to produce witnesses to testify
in court.


4. (SBU) Comment: On numerous occasions, Poloff discussed the case
with senior PF leaders. Although convinced of the merits of their
case, the leaders had difficulty providing compelling evidence to
substantiate their claims. In light of these discussions, the
court's ruling appears to be fair. The failed petition, however,
appears to have weakened the already divided PF party further. In
the lead up to the court ruling, Sata fired PF Secretary General
Edward Mumbi, alleging that Mumbi had undermined the party and been
partly responsible for the case's failure. Sata's failure to
achieve a legal victory, let alone keep his party intact, has
weakened his public image. On April 3, a senior PF youth leader
told Poloff that a growing number of PF members are increasingly
angry at Sata's undemocratic and opaque methods.

Booth