Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09LISBON428
2009-08-06 14:03:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Lisbon
Cable title:  

PORTUGUESE VIEWS ON RECENT CLIMATE CHANGE TALKS

Tags:  ECON ENRG KGCC SENV PREL PO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6448
RR RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHLI #0428/01 2181403
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 061403Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY LISBON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7801
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LISBON 000428 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/29/2019
TAGS: ECON ENRG KGCC SENV PREL PO
SUBJECT: PORTUGUESE VIEWS ON RECENT CLIMATE CHANGE TALKS

Classified By: Gary B. Applegarth, Pol-Econ Officer, Reasons 1.4 (b) an
d (d).

SUMMARY
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LISBON 000428

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/29/2019
TAGS: ECON ENRG KGCC SENV PREL PO
SUBJECT: PORTUGUESE VIEWS ON RECENT CLIMATE CHANGE TALKS

Classified By: Gary B. Applegarth, Pol-Econ Officer, Reasons 1.4 (b) an
d (d).

SUMMARY
--------------


1. (C/NF) Portuguese Ministry of Environment climate change
contacts Nuno Lacasta and Fausto Brito e Abreu welcome
increased U.S. engagement in climate change talks and stress
the urgent need for an agreement at Copenhagen in December

2009. The two accept that a prospective agreement, which
they maintain should retain the strengths and rectify the
shortcomings of the Kyoto Protocol, may represent an interim
step provided it includes mechanisms for future enhancement.
Both also assert that U.S. leadership on the issue is key to
convincing China to participate. End summary.

U.S. LEADERSHIP ESSENTIAL TO COPENHAGEN AGREEMENT
-------------- --------------


2. (C/NF) Poleconoff met with two Portuguese Ministry of
Environment contacts, Fausto Brito e Abreu, advisor to the
Secretary of State for Environment, and Nuno Lacasta,
Coordinator of the Special Committee for Climate Change, on
July 22 to discuss Portuguese impressions of recent climate
change negotiations. Both officials expressed satisfaction
with the "active engagement" of Obama administration
negotiators but emphasized the urgent need for a substantial
agreement at the Copenhagen talks in December. Brito e Abreu
and Lacasta repeatedly stressed the importance of U.S.
leadership to achieving an agreement.

NEW AGREEMENT MUST BE FLEXIBLE, RETAIN KYOTO STRENGTHS
-------------- --------------


3. (C/NF) Both officials are resigned to the possibility
that a prospective Copenhagen agreement could be "too modest"
because of reluctance of U.S. negotiators to accept positions
they judge to be unacceptable to the U.S. Congress, but both
recognize U.S. resolve to act on climate change is evolving.
Therefore, any Copenhagen framework must also define
processes or mechanisms for future amendments or changes.
Lacasta maintained that a U.S. emissions cap and trade scheme
must eventually be comparable to that in the EU to enable
"enlargement" of the emissions market.



4. (C/NF) Despite the current lack of broad agreement on
mid-term (2020) carbon emissions caps, Lacasta maintained
there is de facto agreement on the need to limit global
warming to within 2 degrees celsius of pre-industrial levels.
"All nations must evaluate their own plans to assess whether
they are adequate to help meet the goal," Lacasta continued.


5. (C/NF) Brito e Abreu stressed that a Copenhagen agreement
should retain some elements from the Kyoto Protocol, notably
sectoral mechanisms and the Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM),but other concepts need revision, particularly the
allocation of Assigned Amount Units (AAUs),many of which
resulted from economic restructuring in eastern Europe in the
1990s rather than investments in clean technologies,
resulting in a windfall of AAUs to Russian and Ukraine.

CHINA COMMITMENT ESSENTIAL
--------------


6. (C/NF) Both Brito e Abreu and Lacasta acknowledged it is
essential for China to commit to emissions reduction and
asserted U.S. leadership is key to attaining China's
commitment. To that end Brito e Abreu welcomed recent U.S.
talks with China but disclosed that there is some EU concern
that the U.S. and China could negotiate a "separate
agreement" on climate change. (Comment: Brito e Abreu did
not elaborate, but implied concern that a U.S./China
agreement exclusive of the EU could necessitate a potentially
costly shift in EU climate change direction to align them
with the U.S. and China. End comment.) Both also maintain
India must commit as well, but they are not overly concerned
about the intransigent rhetoric of India's negotiators
because, after having their say in previous talks, India has
ultimately "allowed" itself to be carried forward within the
developing nations' compromise positions.

COMMENT
--------------


7. (C/NF) Brito e Abreu and Lacasta sincerely welcome more
active U.S. engagement in climate change talks and their
optimism about progress in recent talks appears genuine, but
is clearly predicated on presumed evolution of U.S. proposals
toward the EU model. Brito e Abreu's misgivings over a
prospective U.S./China deal are not surprising given his
ardent advocacy of EU climate change leadership in past

LISBON 00000428 002 OF 002


discussions. The key takeaway from this discussion, however,
was the pair's sense of urgency over the conclusion of a
substantial deal at Copenhagen. Although they appear
cautiously optimistic, Brito e Abreu and Lacasta both voiced
concern about mounting resistance to Obama administration
initiatives and fear that the difficult U.S. congressional
debate over health care reform could diminish political will
and capital necessary to gain approval on climate change
legislation, and by extension, Copenhagen success. End
comment.


For more reporting from Embassy Lisbon and information about Portugal,
please see our Intelink site:

http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/portal:port ugal
BALLARD