Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KYIV250
2009-02-05 16:17:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kyiv
Cable title:  

UKRAINE'S TIGIPKO: ONCE AND FUTURE NBU CHIEF?

Tags:  EFIN ECON ETRD PREL PGOV XH UP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4007
PP RUEHIK RUEHLN RUEHPOD RUEHSK RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHKV #0250/01 0361617
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 051617Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY KYIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7219
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KYIV 000250 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/UMB, EEB/OMA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON ETRD PREL PGOV XH UP
SUBJECT: UKRAINE'S TIGIPKO: ONCE AND FUTURE NBU CHIEF?

REF: A) KYIV 169, B) KYIV 243

Sensitive but Unclassified. Not for Internet or
Distribution Outside the USG.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KYIV 000250

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/UMB, EEB/OMA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON ETRD PREL PGOV XH UP
SUBJECT: UKRAINE'S TIGIPKO: ONCE AND FUTURE NBU CHIEF?

REF: A) KYIV 169, B) KYIV 243

Sensitive but Unclassified. Not for Internet or
Distribution Outside the USG.


1. (SBU) Summary. In a statement that may presage his
return to higher office, former National Bank of Ukraine
(NBU) Governor, Rada deputy, and influential commercial
banker Sergey Tigipko declared on February 5 that the
economic crisis in Ukraine is being consciously prolonged.
He blamed inept crisis management, levying his strongest
rebukes at the NBU for its exchange rate policies, the
Cabinet of Ministers for its budget, and the three branches
of government for their wavering. The timing of his
remarks was certainly chosen with care, as Tigipko is
considered to be a top contender to take over the NBU from
Volodymyr Stelmakh, should President Yushchenko decide to
drop his support for the disgraced Governor. Notable also
is the statement's substance, as Tigipko's knowledge of
financial matters and professionalism is generally
acknowledged, particularly when compared to other leaders
who have consistently failed to take necessary actions
during the crisis. End summary.


2. (SBU) Tigipko's criticisms, published in the February 5
edition of Kontrakty magazine, focused primarily on the
NBU, an institution Tigipko led until 2004. In his
manifesto-like statement, he suggested that Ukraine's
problems could be solved "in several months, if the country
had qualified crisis managers" in positions of
responsibility. Pointing to the NBU's policy of
"releasing" the exchange rate "without taking other steps,"
Tigipko said that the NBU's authority as an impartial
regulator has been lost, leading to a panic among
depositors and widespread social tension. He noted
particular measures that the NBU should now embrace,
including a greater allocation of liquidity for the
interbank market to prevent an "unjustified exchange rate
rush."


3. (SBU) "All three branches of power and the NBU have to
seriously think about sustaining economic growth," said
Tigipko, who insinuated that a lack of a coordinated
response was prolonging the crisis. Populism has taken

important structural reforms off the table, even though
some "clipping of the bushes during wintertime" is urgently
needed in the budget and state pension system. "All social
payments must be totally frozen," Tigipko said. Weak
fiscal policy has inhibited a "growth and investment
budget," necessary for long-term economic development.
Pointing to Ukrzaliznytsia (the state Ukrainian railroad
firm),highways, bridges, and other infrastructure
projects, Tigipko stated, "Investment does not mean
profiteering and instant gains;" rather, it is "momentum
for growth." "If we do nothing now, do not help
investors," he warned, "later on such help will be of no
use and there will be no one to help."


4. (SBU) Tigipko is widely rumored to be a potential
replacement for NBU Governor Stelmakh, who the Rada voted
to dismiss on January 26 by invalidating Stelmakh's 2004
appointment as NBU head. Although the Rada vote has no
legal standing, it was seen as a symbolic slap in the face
of President Yushchenko (Stelmakh's ally and friend) and
the NBU, for its hamfisted handling of a severe currency
devaluation and for corrupt bank refinancing practices (Ref
A). While parliament cannot legally dismiss Stelmakh or
appoint his successor, it nonetheless attempted to install
Tigipko in Stelmakh's place, barely failing in this effort
by a few votes.


5. (SBU) The Rada vote has led to speculation by media
analysts on Stelmakh's departure and even may have
concentrated public opinion in favor of Tigipko. In the
February 5 edition of Ekonomicheskaya Izvestiya, an
influential daily, editors conducted an online poll of the
best potential choice for a new NBU chief. Tigipko won in
a landslide vote by the paper's informed readership,
followed by his former NBU deputy and ex-Rada Speaker
Arseniy Yatseniuk, who placed a distant second.


6. (U) Tigipko is a current Rada deputy and the chairman
of Swedbank's Ukrainian subsidiary. Previously, he was NBU
Governor (2002-2004) and campaign director for Viktor
Yanukovich during the 2004 presidential elections. In
2007, he sold two major Ukrainian banking assets -- TAS
Kommertsbank and TAS Investbank -- to Swedish-owned

KYIV 00000250 002 OF 002


Swedbank AB. The reported total of the transaction was
$735 million dollars, a price some considered above market
rate for the then 18th and 34th largest banks in the
country.


7. (SBU) Comment. To our ear, Tigipko has hit all the
right notes with his statement. Budgetary tightening,
targeted investment, and greater transparency in the
banking sector are urgent priorities for Ukraine that
require strong, respected, and well-positioned leadership.
Moreover, this message has come at a timely moment, as an
IMF team, in Kyiv at least until February 6 to review the
Fund's $16.4 billion package, is struggling to gain
agreement with the NBU on a bank recapitalization and
resolution framework (Ref B). With Stelmakh gone until at
least mid-February and the central bank in limbo, Tigipko
may be positioning himself for a return to his erstwhile
job. At the very least, he is saying what needs to be said
at a critical moment, while other leaders stand idle or act
in ways that make the crisis worse. End comment.

TAYLOR