Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KUWAIT1053
2009-11-04 13:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kuwait
Cable title:  

KUWAITI NOTABLES PRESS AMIR ON RATIONAL USE OF

Tags:  PREL PGOV ECON KU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8772
PP RUEHDE RUEHDH RUEHDIR
DE RUEHKU #1053/01 3081356
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 041356Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY KUWAIT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4152
INFO RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUWAIT 001053 

SIPDIS

NEA/ARP, NEA/RA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/02/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV ECON KU
SUBJECT: KUWAITI NOTABLES PRESS AMIR ON RATIONAL USE OF
PUBLIC FUNDS

Classified By: Political Counselor Pete O'Donohue for reasons 1.4 b and
d

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUWAIT 001053

SIPDIS

NEA/ARP, NEA/RA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/02/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV ECON KU
SUBJECT: KUWAITI NOTABLES PRESS AMIR ON RATIONAL USE OF
PUBLIC FUNDS

Classified By: Political Counselor Pete O'Donohue for reasons 1.4 b and
d


1. (U) Summary: Worried by a continued sense of drift in
Kuwaiti political and economic life, a group of twenty-six
prominent Kuwaiti "notables" -- known locally as the Group of
26, "G-26" -- took their concerns directly to the Amir on
October 12 and, in a subsequent October 20 meeting, met with
the Amir and senior GOK leadership, including the Crown
Prince, PM, National Assembly Speaker and the Council of
Ministers. In their discussions the G-26 emphasized the need
for a clear five-year development plan, a crackdown on
corruption and a halt to the squandering of public funds.
The series of meetings attracted considerable media attention
and managed to irritate some members of parliament, who
viewed the group's meetings with the Amir and senior
leadership as an end-run around Parliament's right to bring
public concerns directly to the leadership. Many Kuwaitis
approved of the G-26 initiative however, viewing the meeting
between the Amir and his wisemen as fully within Arab
tradition and a necessary measure to convey to the leadership
the group's urgent conviction that an absence of sound
development planning is costing Kuwait time and money and
causing the country to be left in the dust by its more
focused neighbors; few Kuwaitis count on Parliament to convey
such a message effectively. G-26 members say that the group
has no long-term organizational agenda; its sole purpose has
been to impress upon the leadership the need for a coherent
forward strategy. End Summary.


2. (C) The G-26 is a self-organized group comprised,
primarily, of persons prominent in the business world but
also including a number of former MPs and Ministers,
academics and media personalities; members include
representatives from Kuwait's diverse ethnic and ideological
spectrum, including Sunnis and Shi'a, liberals and
conservatives, united by a common sense that the country is
drifting and heading into trouble. Despite the eclectic
make-up of the group, the G-26's meetings with GOK leadership
drew particular fire from Islamist and tribalist MPs, who

viewed the group as an assembly of elitist "downtown"
progressives who were seeking to trump parliament's role and
undercut tribalist and Islamist influence. Islamist MP Dr.
Dhaifullah Bu Ramiya publicly castigated the meetings,
suggesting that the group's formation was instigated by
Deputy PM for Economic Affairs Shaykh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al Sabah
(the driving force behind a realistic development plan) as a
way to "impoverish" the Kuwaiti people, a reference to the
GOK's refusal to forgive or absorb private consumer debt, a
stance that is supported by the G-26 but which is anathema to
many Islamists and tribalists. Islamist MPs Dr. Walid
Al-Tabtabaie and Dr. Mohammed Hayef Al-Mutairi also publicly
criticized the meetings, arguing that Parliament alone has
the right to counsel the leadership. Some MPs also queried
whether the G-26 was being orchestrated by the GOK as a new
kind of permanent pro-government PAC or lobbying entity.
(Note: a number of Kuwaiti insiders lauded the G-26's effort
and supported its message but, at the same time, believed
that the group was instigated by the Amiri diwan itself. One
prominent analyst, Zuhair Al-Mahmeed, Secretary General of
the Islamic National Consensus Movement (a moderate,
predominantly Shi'a think-tank),told PolCouns that he
believed the Amiri diwan had given the group the "green
light" to set the stage for Parliament's October 27
re-convening. Mahmeed believed the Amir's aim was to
demonstrate that he has a significant part of the Kuwait
public on his side and intends to use this as a stick with
which to threaten a potentially obstructive Parliament. End
Note.)


3. (C) Despite the hue and cry from some Islamist and
tribalist MPs, many Kuwaitis appeared to welcome the
intervention by a group of prominent citizens, noting that it
was high time that distinguished Kuwaitis take public
concerns directly to the top, rather than rely on a feckless
and agenda-driven Parliament. By going to see the Amir as a
group rather as a series of well-connected individuals, the
G-26 also allay suspicions -- all too common in Kuwait --
that they are trying to work private "deals" with the Amir
rather than attending to the public weal. During a recent
diwaniyya (traditional Kuwaiti evening social gathering)
attended by DCM and PolCouns, a G-26 participant told the
gathering that the Amir had warmly received the group and had
subsequently instructed Cabinet ministers to meet with them.
Liberal attendees at the diwaniyya expressed their regret
that the G-26 had dropped the ball on reaching out to the
media, allowing disgruntled conservative MPs to steal a march
on them and unfairly characterize the G-26 as an unelected,
unrepresentative elite whose emergence threatened Kuwait's

KUWAIT 00001053 002 OF 002


democracy and foreshadowed a possible dissolution of
Parliament and a return to the unelected "majlis" (council of
notables) of years past. At least one diwaniyya attendee,
while lauding the concept, regretted that the G-26's members
included prominent Islamist Ahmed Baqr, suggesting that Baqr
would try to sow seeds of dissent and subvert the group from
within. Apparently, this has not happened.


4. (C) Mohammed Al-Dallal, a prominent lawyer, member of the
Islamic Constitutional Movement (ICM - Kuwait's version of
the Muslim Brotherhood) and a leading member of the G-26,
told PolCouns on November 2 that the G-26 was self-generated
by a group of concerned citizens in September out of
frustration with the ineffectiveness of Parliament, political
groupings and civil society to counteract government drift
and fiscal mismanagement. These activists felt that they had
a better chance of getting their message to the senior
leadership by going around Parliament and Kuwait's various
contending and mutually antagonistic political "tendencies."
As a consequence, Dallal said, the activists elected to
nominate an ad hoc group of 26 respected persons (including
10-12 technical specialists) from Kuwait's political and
religious spectrum who shared a common concern over Kuwait's
direction and could agree to focus on a specific subject --
the better management of Kuwait's public funds. While the
term "G-26" caught on in the media, the group initially
called itself the "Group to Rationalize Spending and Halt the
Squandering of Public Funds." Dallal said the group's
simple message was to convince the GOK that it needs a
comprehensive and coherent long-term plan in order to manage
public funds transparently and effectively. Dallal denied
that the group was instigated by the Amiri diwan or that it
had any long-term organizational ambitions; the G-26 has
largely done it's job and will disband soon. He dismissed
the criticism of MPs that the G-26 had violated parliamentary
prerogatives or was seeking to marginalize Parliament, but
expressed the "hope" that MPs themselves would adopt the
group's message and take more seriously the need for a
coherent long-term development plan.


5. (C) Comment: Dallal's account of the genesis of the G-26
is partially accurate, but there can be no question but that
the group received the private blessing of the Prime Minister
-- and his chief nominal parliamentary whip Ahmed Al-Fahad --
before moving forward. Nonetheless, many Kuwaitis are
legitimately concerned about wastage, perceived corruption
and drift in government and disenchanted with the capacity of
their Parliament -- dominated as it is by agenda-driven
members of every stripe -- to support a comprehensive and
coherent long-term development plan. Ironically, historical
pushes to "protect public funds" have often masked rear-guard
actions by well-connected business elements on the losing
side of large government contracts -- the net result of which
has been constant re-tendering and consequently greater
wastage and delay. However, the G-26 appears to be raising
the issue of corruption and incompetence more generally and
for legitimate reasons; thus their effort to organize and
articulate common concerns -- even if they had to first do a
"mother may I" with the Al Sabah leadership -- still
represents a positive step by Kuwaiti civil society to
organize and articulate common concerns. Their welcoming
reception by the Amir and other senior GOK leadership was
clearly intended to send a message to Parliament, albeit one
the Parliament will likely ignore; whether the Al Sabah
leadership will pay any more attention to the G-26's message
to them on the need for greater governmental vigor and
accountability remains similarly in doubt. End Comment.


********************************************* *********
For more reporting from Embassy Kuwait, visit:
visit Kuwait's Classified Website at:

http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Kuwa it
********************************************* *********
JONES