Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KUALALUMPUR29
2009-01-15 10:23:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Cable title:
MALAYSIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGED IN UPR PROCESS
VZCZCXYZ0006 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHKL #0029 0151023 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 151023Z JAN 09 FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2241 INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 1100 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1656
UNCLAS KUALA LUMPUR 000029
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FOR EAP/MTS, DRL/MLGA CHRIS SIBILLA, IO/RHS AMY OSTERMEIER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UNHRC MY
SUBJECT: MALAYSIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGED IN UPR PROCESS
REF: 08 STATE 130829
UNCLAS KUALA LUMPUR 000029
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FOR EAP/MTS, DRL/MLGA CHRIS SIBILLA, IO/RHS AMY OSTERMEIER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UNHRC MY
SUBJECT: MALAYSIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGED IN UPR PROCESS
REF: 08 STATE 130829
1. (SBU) Malaysia's civil society and leading NGOs are
proactively engaged in the Universal Periodic review (UPR)
process, though with limited interaction with the Malaysian
government. The Coalition of Malaysia NGOs in the UPR
Process (COMANGO),an umbrella organization of over 35 NGOs,
coordinated civil society UPR submissions. COMANGO briefed
the diplomatic community on December 4, including
distribution of UPR submissions. The government (GOM)
conducted perfunctory consultations with civil society groups
other than Malaysia's Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM),
which reports to the Prime Minister's office. SUHAKAM also
provided a UPR submission. COMANGO and other participating
organizations, including the Malaysian Bar Council, were
highly critical of the GOM's UPR submission, highlighting
several inaccurate statements within the document, including
in the areas of: applying the rule of law; independence of
the judiciary; compliance with international human rights
treaties; access to education by foreigners in Malaysia;
protection of cultural and indigenous people's rights;
compliance of Malaysia's pledges during its election to the
Human Rights Council in 2006; and placing responsibility for
trafficking in persons on source countries without adequate
recognition of Malaysia's responsibilities as a destination
country.
2. (SBU) COMANGO's submission addressed basic freedoms, such
as religion, speech, assembly, and press. The Bar Council
addressed GOM's stance on the Universal Declaration of
Rights, and GOM's lack of progress in complying with the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention of the Rights of the
Child. GOM acceded to both treaties, but with reservations.
The Bar Council's submission also notes GOM shortcomings
applying the rule of law, holding fair and free elections,
and in respect for basic freedoms, such as speech, religion,
the press, and due process. Other NGO submissions addressed
alleged abuses committed by the People's Volunteer Corps
(RELA),the rights of indigenous people, migrant workers, and
refugees.
3. (U) Post continues to follow the UPR process and engage
with NGOs that made UPR submissions.
KEITH
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FOR EAP/MTS, DRL/MLGA CHRIS SIBILLA, IO/RHS AMY OSTERMEIER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UNHRC MY
SUBJECT: MALAYSIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGED IN UPR PROCESS
REF: 08 STATE 130829
1. (SBU) Malaysia's civil society and leading NGOs are
proactively engaged in the Universal Periodic review (UPR)
process, though with limited interaction with the Malaysian
government. The Coalition of Malaysia NGOs in the UPR
Process (COMANGO),an umbrella organization of over 35 NGOs,
coordinated civil society UPR submissions. COMANGO briefed
the diplomatic community on December 4, including
distribution of UPR submissions. The government (GOM)
conducted perfunctory consultations with civil society groups
other than Malaysia's Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM),
which reports to the Prime Minister's office. SUHAKAM also
provided a UPR submission. COMANGO and other participating
organizations, including the Malaysian Bar Council, were
highly critical of the GOM's UPR submission, highlighting
several inaccurate statements within the document, including
in the areas of: applying the rule of law; independence of
the judiciary; compliance with international human rights
treaties; access to education by foreigners in Malaysia;
protection of cultural and indigenous people's rights;
compliance of Malaysia's pledges during its election to the
Human Rights Council in 2006; and placing responsibility for
trafficking in persons on source countries without adequate
recognition of Malaysia's responsibilities as a destination
country.
2. (SBU) COMANGO's submission addressed basic freedoms, such
as religion, speech, assembly, and press. The Bar Council
addressed GOM's stance on the Universal Declaration of
Rights, and GOM's lack of progress in complying with the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention of the Rights of the
Child. GOM acceded to both treaties, but with reservations.
The Bar Council's submission also notes GOM shortcomings
applying the rule of law, holding fair and free elections,
and in respect for basic freedoms, such as speech, religion,
the press, and due process. Other NGO submissions addressed
alleged abuses committed by the People's Volunteer Corps
(RELA),the rights of indigenous people, migrant workers, and
refugees.
3. (U) Post continues to follow the UPR process and engage
with NGOs that made UPR submissions.
KEITH