Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KATHMANDU864
2009-09-18 08:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: JUDICIAL POLITICS, POLITICIZED JUDICIARY

Tags:  PGOV PHUM EAID KDEM NP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8780
PP RUEHCI
DE RUEHKT #0864/01 2610851
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 180851Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0763
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 7120
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 7442
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2776
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 5483
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 6605
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3227
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA PRIORITY 4754
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 2413
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 3655
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000864 

SIPDIS

USAID FOR Z. SUDA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/15/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM EAID KDEM NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: JUDICIAL POLITICS, POLITICIZED JUDICIARY

REF: KATHMANDU 813

Classified By: Charge d' Affaires, a.i., Jeffrey A. Moon. Reasons 1.4 (
b/d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000864

SIPDIS

USAID FOR Z. SUDA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/15/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM EAID KDEM NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: JUDICIAL POLITICS, POLITICIZED JUDICIARY

REF: KATHMANDU 813

Classified By: Charge d' Affaires, a.i., Jeffrey A. Moon. Reasons 1.4 (
b/d).


1. (C) Summary: Key judicial leaders in Nepal are deeply
concerned about Maoist-supported constitutional proposals on
the judiciary, which would empower parliament to appoint and
remove judges, and interpret the constitution. The Supreme
Court Chief Justice and others are actively lobbying the
Constituent Assembly members against the plan, and planting
sympathetic stories in the media. If the Maoist proposal
becomes part of the final constitution, it would be a blow to
judicial independence and Nepal's long-term democratic
development. End Summary.


2. (SBU) The report draws on Charge's and USAID Director's
September 11 meeting with Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Min Bahadur Rayamajhee and Supreme Court Registrar Ram
Krishna Timalsena, as well as P/E Chief's September 14
meeting with Judicial Counsel Secretariat Joint-Secretary
Nahakul Subedi.

Constitutional Proposal Pinging Alarm Bells
--------------

3. (C) Chief Justice Rayamajhee and Registrar Timalsena
expressed deep reservations about the Maoist-supported
Constituent Assembly (CA) committee report on the judiciary.
Under the proposal - tabled in the full CA on September 13 -
Parliament would have the power to appoint and fire judges,
as well as "interpret" the constitution. Timalsena called
the proposal a violation of "core democratic values" and
"separation of powers." He urged the international community
to support the "accepted principle" of judicial independence.



4. (SBU) Behind the Maoist proposal is a belief that the
Nepali judiciary has been heavily dominated by men from the
upper castes (Brahmin/Chhetri),the Judicial Council's Subedi
observed. (Note: Under the current system, the
largely-independent Judicial Council, not parliament, picks
and disciplines judges. End note.) The Maoists argue that
only the parliament - as the "people's representatives" - has
the legitimacy to make judicial appointments. Subedi
defended the current system, arguing that the pool of
qualified judicial appointments in Nepal is quite small

making it difficult to identify strong women candidates or
candidates from traditionally-disadvantaged ethnic or caste
groups. He noted that the latest judicial appointments
included one Dalit ("untouchable"),several women, and "six
or seven" Madhesi.


5. (C) According to Subedi, the Maoists successfully pushed
their proposal through the constitutional committee by
cobbling together votes from the various Madhesi parties, who
were sympathetic to the diversity argument and annoyed with
the Supreme Court's recent decision on the Vice President's
oath. (Note: Vice President Jha, who is originally from
Nepal's Terai region, took his oath of office in the linga
franca of the Terai, Hindi, on July 23, 2008. After numerous
legal challenges, the Supreme Court ruled on August 28 that
Jha is required to take the oath in the Nepali language,
which he has refused to do (reftel). End note.)

Fighting Back
--------------

6. (C) The Chief Justice has been actively lobbying the CA to
preserve the principle of judicial independence in the new
constitution. He invited a group of key CA members to his
chambers to meet with senior Supreme Court judges. The
Judicial Council's Subedi has separately given confidential
background papers to allies in the CA and met with the
committee regularly. The Chief Justice and Registrar also
have been providing "background briefings" to the press -
highly unusual for the Nepali judiciary. Nearly all opinion
pieces in the mainstream Nepali press have criticized the

KATHMANDU 00000864 002 OF 002


Maoist constitutional proposal.

Other Worries
--------------

7. (SBU) When asked about the constitutional federalism
debate, the Chief Justice said he was concerned about
proposals that would allow municipal courts to apply "local
law" in a unified federal system. While individuals could
appeal these cases to district court, the jurisdictional
lines and administration of justice could become difficult
and confusing. The Chief Justice also highlighted
enforcement of judges as a major challenge for the Nepali
legal system and expressed hope that the recent creation of a
judicial enforcement directorate would address the problem.

Appreciation for U.S. Support
--------------

8. (SBU) The Chief Justice and Registrar Timalsena expressed
their deep appreciated for the support of USAID, particularly
the case management program. In part because of the USAID
support, the case backlog has dropped from 22,000 to 10,900.
USAID also funded a pilot project on mediation, which the
Ministry of Justice is now implementing across the country
through its own funds.


9. (C) Comment: Post agrees that the Maoist proposal on the
judiciary raises serious concerns about Nepal's democratic
future. If implemented, judges would be beholden to
politicians for their jobs, further compromising an
already-weak institution. While the Maoist concern about the
lack of diversity on the courts is legitimate, there are
other ways to address that issue without undermining judicial
independence. We are encouraged by the vocal criticism of
the Maoist proposal in the press, and remain hopeful that the
key political parties, including the Nepali Congress and UML,
will stand firm on this issue in the final constitutional
negotiations. End Comment.
MOON