Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KATHMANDU325
2009-04-21 10:01:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: ARMY CHIEF RESPONDS TO CHARGES, NO

Tags:  PGOV MARR PREL PTER NP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5073
OO RUEHCI
DE RUEHKT #0325/01 1111001
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 211001Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0069
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 6913
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 7230
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2552
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 5274
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 6423
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 2980
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA PRIORITY 4565
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 2290
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 3484
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000325 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/20/2019
TAGS: PGOV MARR PREL PTER NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: ARMY CHIEF RESPONDS TO CHARGES, NO
GOVERNMENT DECISION YET

REF: KATHMANDU 320

Classified By: Ambassador Nancy J. Powell. Reasons 1.4 (b/d)

Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000325

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/20/2019
TAGS: PGOV MARR PREL PTER NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: ARMY CHIEF RESPONDS TO CHARGES, NO
GOVERNMENT DECISION YET

REF: KATHMANDU 320

Classified By: Ambassador Nancy J. Powell. Reasons 1.4 (b/d)

Summary
--------------


1. (C) Early on April 21, Chief of Army Staff General
Rookmangud Katawal provided a written response to the letter
he received a day earlier from the cabinet requiring him to
explain his alleged acts in violation of government
directives and law on three issues. His response addressed
the issues of Nepal Army (NA) recruitment, the brigadier
generals' continued reporting to duty and the NA's withdrawal
from the National Games. At the outset, his "clarification"
argued that the President was the only one with legal
authority to remove him. At close of business April 21, the
cabinet had not yet met to review Katawal's response. Most
of the parties mobilized April 21 under the opposition Nepali
Congress's leadership to oppose his removal and consultations
have taken place or are talking place involving various key
figures, including the President, the Prime Minister and
Indian Ambassador Sood. If Katawal is removed, his current
deputy, Lt. General Kul Khadka, Chief of Staff, is next in
line.

Katawal Responds
--------------


2. (C) Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Rookmangud Katawal
had his aide deliver a detailed response by 10 a.m. April 21
to the cabinet secretary and the Defense Ministry to the
letter he received a day earlier from the cabinet requiring
him to explain his alleged acts in violation of government
directives (reftel). He was required to respond within 24
hours. His four-point response reaffirms his and the Nepal
Army's commitment to the Interim Constitution, laws and
directives, and his respect for civilian authority. His
"clarification" on the recruitment issue claims that the
recruitment was authorized, notified to the Defense Ministry
and is now the subject of a pending Supreme Court case. With
respect to the brigadier generals' continued reporting to
duty, his response also cites the pending Supreme Court case
as a reason why his actions should not be considered
unlawful. On the issue of withdrawal from the National
Games, Katawal attributes the decision primarily to the Nepal
Army's sports club, and not to any command decision.

President Not Cabinet Has Final Say
--------------


3. (C) The COAS argues in his response that since, under the
Interim Constitution, it is the President who appoints the
COAS and who controls, mobilizes and manages the Nepal Army
(NA),on the recommendation of the cabinet, it is the
President who has the final say on his removal. Katawal also
makes the case that his removal is governed by the old Army
Act, not the new one from 2006 which the cabinet cited, since
he was appointed under the old Army Act. (Comment: This
legal argument strikes us as a weak one; it is our
understanding that the President must, in practice, carry out
whatever the cabinet recommends.)

Cabinet Yet To Meet
--------------


4. (C) At close of business on April 21, the cabinet had yet
to meet. Meanwhile, 21 of the 24 parties in the Constituent
Assembly, at a meeting called by the opposition Nepali
Congress on April 21 issued a statement opposing Katawal's
removal because of the threat it posed to Nepal's peace
process. The parties -- which included the governing
Communist Party of Nepal - United Marxist Leninist (UML),but
not the Madhesi People's Rights Forum and another small
Madhesi party in the coalition -- planned to raise their
concerns with President Yadav. President Yadav encouraged
Prime Minister Dahal when they met April 20 to work with the

KATHMANDU 00000325 002 OF 002


other parties to find a solution. They were reportedly
planning to meet again April 21. Indian Ambassador Sood was
also reportedly planning to see Dahal (for their second
meeting in two days). If Katawal is removed, the
next-in-line is his deputy, Lt. General Kul Khadka, Chief of
Staff.

Comment
--------------


5. (C) With so many parties mobilizing to oppose the Maoist
push to remove Army chief Katawal, including, it appears, a
faction of the governing UML, the Maoists' freedom of
maneuver is narrowing. The Maoists' senior committee, its
16-member Secretariat, reportedly affirmed its support April
21 for Katawal's removal, but the Maoists will have to
consider opposition views before acting. Finding a
face-saving solution that does not make the Maoists once
again look weak vis-a-vis the Nepal Army will be difficult.
Our message continues to be twofold: the Army must respect
civilian control and the Nepali Government must exercise that
control in a responsible way.
POWELL