PAKISTAN MEDIA REACTION: APRIL 09, 2009

UNCLAS ISLAMABAD 000756

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KMDR KPAO OIIP OPRC PGOV PREL PK
SUBJECT: PAKISTAN MEDIA REACTION: APRIL 09, 2009

Summary: Most dailies on Thursday highlighted President Zardari's
remarks made during his interview with British daily, "The
Independent" that the "U.S. has promised no drone strikes in
Balochistan." Also front-paged were reports that Taliban commander
Mullah Nazeer Ahmad claimed that "Taliban will soon capture
Islamabad." Newspapers gave prominent coverage to reports that
"Swat Taliban move to gain foothold in adjacent Buner region." All
newspapers highlighted comments by U.S. Special Envoy Holbrooke,
currently visiting India, ruling out "nudging India to resume
bilateral talks with Pakistan." The killing of four militants as a
result of U.S. drone attack in South Waziristan Agency also received
wide coverage. Reports and photographs of the meetings of
Congressional delegation, led by John Kyl, with Pakistani government
officials also garnered media attention.

Most major dailies continued to run editorials on the recent visit
of Richard Holbrooke and Admiral Mike Mullen to Pakistan. The
English daily, "Dawn," noted that "for the first time since the two
joined hands in the battle against militancy, both sides have
publicly acknowledged that they differ markedly on how the fight
should be fought." Another English daily, "The News," observed that
"for the first time since the new U.S. administration took over
early this year, Washington and Islamabad have conceded that they
distinctly differ on their approach to terrorism. The move by
Islamabad to respond in no uncertain terms to Washington's demands
is welcome." The second largest Urdu daily, "Nawa-i-Waqt," wrote:
"This is a welcome development that our rulers, weary of repeated
American demands, have courageously conveyed 'no-more' to the
American officials." End Summary.

--------------
News Stories
--------------

"Balochistan to Be Spared Of Drone Raids, Zardari Assured" "Dawn"
(04/09)

"President Asif Ali Zardari has said the United States has assured
Pakistan that it has no intention to extend drone attacks to
Balochistan. 'President Obama has denied any such intentions to
extend the use of drone attacks to Balochistan,' he said in an
interview to a British newspaper 'The Independent.'"

"Al Qaeda Does Not Exist In Balochistan, U.S. Fears Not True: Chief
Minister Raisani" "Jasarat" (04/07)

"Balochistan's Chief Minister Nawab Aslam Raisani while talking to
media in Karachi has rejected the reports of Al Qaeda's presence in
Balochistan and has warned that if drone attacks were initiated
against Balochistan they will meet severe resistance."

"Pakistan To Do U.S. Bidding If Drones Provided" "The News" (04/09)

"President Asif Ali Zardari has called on America to provide his
country with an arsenal of drones and missiles to target militants
blamed for a wave of violence rather than to carry out independent
operations that violate the nation's sovereignty."

"Taliban Will Soon Capture Islamabad, Says Mullah Nazeer" "Daily
Times" (04/09)

"Pakistani Taliban commander Mullah Nazeer Ahmed said in an
interview with Al Qaeda's media arm, Al-Sahab, that the Taliban
would soon capture Islamabad. Pakistani Taliban factions had united
and would take their war to the capital, he said."

"Swat Taliban Move to Gain Foothold In Buner" "Dawn" (04/09)

"After consolidating their hold on Swat, militants in the valley
have ventured into the adjacent Buner region and rejected calls by
the local Qaumi Jirga to leave the district."

"U.S. Rejects Indo-Pak Mediation" "Dawn" (04/09)

"U.S. Af-Pak envoy Richard Holbrooke said in New Delhi on Wednesday
that he sees peace in the region possible only with India's active
support to the efforts undertaken by Pakistan and Afghanistan, but
he ruled out nudging New Delhi to resume bilateral talks with
Islamabad as a step in that effort."
"India, Pakistan, U.S. Face Common Threat, Says Holbrooke" "The
News" (04/09)

"The threat posed by Al Qaeda and its allies can be met only with
the joint efforts of arch rivals India and Pakistan, as well as the
United States, U.S. envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard
Holbrooke told reporters in New Delhi."

"U.S. Envoys Had 'Good Meetings' With Pak Leaders" "The News"
(04/09)

"The United States on Wednesday said its top envoys, Special
Representative for Region Richard Holbrooke and Chairman Joint
Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen, had constructive meetings with Pakistani
leaders this week, adding it supports Islamabad in fighting
extremism on Afghan border, State Department spokesman Robert Wood
said at the daily briefing."

"Four Militants Killed In U.S. Drone In South Waziristan" "Dawn"
(04/09)

"A suspected U.S. pilotless plane killed Four militants in an attack
on a vehicle in South Waziristan on Wednesday."

"Obama's New Strategy Sours U.S.-Pakistan Ties" "Dawn" (04/09)

"U.S. President Barack Obama's new strategy is causing serious
differences between the United States and Pakistan over how to fight
the militants hiding in the Pak-Afghan region. U.S. think-tanks and
the media believe that the differences revolve around two major
issues: India's role in Afghanistan and the drone attacks at
suspected terrorist targets inside Pakistan. In a report distributed
on Wednesday, the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations noted that in
their meetings with America's special envoy Richard Holbrooke and
Chairman of U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen,
Pakistani officials contended that Washington showed
disproportionate support for India in its bilateral relations with
Pakistan."

"U.S. Criticized For Ignoring Pakistan's Concerns" "Dawn" (04/09)

"When they ask Pakistan to sever its alleged ties with the Taliban,
U.S. officials focus on three militant leaders, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar,
Commander Jalaluddin Haqqani and Commander Nazir. Diplomatic
observers in Washington, however, acknowledge that while urging
Pakistan to end its links to the militants, the Americans do not
address the concerns and fears that force Pakistan to keep an option
other than the one offered by the United States."

"Drones May Have Hurt More Than Helped, Says U.S. Officials" "The
Nation" (04/09)

"Concerns are growing among U.S. intelligence and military officials
that the increasing drone attacks in Pakistan's tribal areas strikes
are bolstering the insurgency by prompting Islamist radicals to
disperse into the country's heartland, according to a media
report."

"Extremists Relocating To Big Cities To Avoid Drone Attacks" "Daily
Times" (04/09)

"Al Qaeda, Taliban and other militants have been relocating from the
Tribal Areas to Pakistan's overcrowded and impoverished cities,
which is likely to make it harder to find and stop them from staging
terrorist attacks, officials say."

"Nawaz Asks U.S. To Deal FATA Politically" "The News" (04/09)

"PML-N Quaid Nawaz Sharif during a meeting with different foreign
diplomats, members of the U.S. Senate and Congressmen has opposed
the use of force and drone attacks in the tribal areas and stressed
for need for resolving issues through dialogue."

"Envoys Support Nawaz's Stance On Drone Attacks" "Dawn" (04/09)

"Envoys of some European and Latin American countries as well as a
group of U.S. Congressmen and Senators called on Pakistan Muslim
League-N Chief Nawaz Sharif at his Raiwind residence on Wednesday,
supported Nawaz's stance on drone attacks, and said the air-strikes
were a violation of Pakistan's airspace."

"NA Committee Proposes Talks With Militants" "Dawn" (04/09)

"A Parliamentary Committee has outlined a new peace initiative,
calling for initiating talks with extremists and militants who
accepted the government's writ, instead of waiting for them to lay
down arms."

"Clocks To Be Advanced On 15th" "Dawn" (04/09)

"The Federal Cabinet decided on Wednesday to advance the clock by
one hour (GMT+6) from April 15 as an energy conservation measure."

--------------
Editorials/Op-eds
--------------

"A New Stance," an editorial in the Karachi-based center-left
independent national English daily "Dawn" (cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"For the first time since the two joined hands in the battle against
militancy, both sides have publicly acknowledged that they differ
markedly on how the fight should be fought.... Unfortunately, the
Obama administration's policy on Pakistan is similar to that of its
predecessor. Its tone, in fact, is even more aggressive and
threatening.... Then there is the curious expectation that Pakistan
will do more even as inflammatory stories are planted in the
American press."

"Harsh Words," an editorial in the centrist national English daily
"The News" (cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"For the first time since the new US administration took over early
this year, Washington and Islamabad have conceded that they
distinctly differ on their approach to terrorism.... The move by
Islamabad to respond in no uncertain terms to Washington's demands
is welcome.... If Washington had believed it could simply bulldoze
through its dictates, it has run into an obstacle."

"A Message To The U.S. That Says 'No More': Fulfill All Demands To
Defend The Borders Now," an editorial in the second-largest,
center-right nationalist Urdu daily "Nawa-i-Waqt" (cir. 125,000)
(04/09)

"This is a welcome development that our rulers, weary of repeated
American demands, have courageously conveyed 'no-more' to the
American officials.... Our administration should not let any drone
return in one piece.... This is the time for practical steps;
America is an enemy country and not our ally and it should be dealt
with accordingly."

"Has The Moment Of Decision Still Not Arrived?," an editorial in the
Karachi-based, pro-Taliban Jihadi Urdu daily "Islam" (cir. 15,000)
(04/09)

"Pakistan Foreign Minister's statement that they have drawn a red
line before the U.S. and that the U.S. has acceded to Pakistan's
posture of not launching ground attacks is an attempt to divert
attention from the real issue. Ground attacks in the tribal areas
have never been a priority with the U.S. Had the American troops
been capable of succeeding in ground assaults they must done so in
Southern Afghanistan where they are at the mercy of the Taliban.
The U.S. is just maintaining its edge in Afghanistan due to its
aerial superiority and is also trying to wash away it embarrassment
by launching aerial attacks in Pakistani tribal areas. If the
Pakistani leadership acts with courage, then these drone attacks
could be stopped."

"Don't Come Under U.S. Pressure," an editorial in the Peshawar-based
Urdu-language daily "Mashriq" (cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"The recent team of U.S. visitors was of diplomatic level, which met
Pakistan's top leadership which is against diplomatic norms. These
negotiations should have held on the diplomatic level alone. By
negotiating with the top Pakistani leadership the U.S. diplomats
have tried to give a psychological impression that the U.S. still
desires to continue its supremacy over the world and is still
pursuing the uni-polar world order. The sole purpose of their visit
was to brief their Pakistani interlocutors about the new U.S.
polices and that how Pakistan should act upon those. It is high
time the elected government of Pakistan acted with prudence in
dealing with the U.S."

"Holbrooke-Mullen Mission ... U.S. Ambitions Have Come To The Fore,"
an editorial in the popular rightist Urdu-language daily "Ausaf"
(cir. 10,000) (04/09)

"After coming into power, several Pakistani quarters were expecting
President Obama that he would altogether change the policies of
President Bush and would pursue reconciliation. But time has once
again proven that faces change in the U.S. but the policies remain
the same. The Obama administration is proving much worse than the
Bush administration towards Pakistan."

"Trust Deficit," an editorial in the center-right national English
daily "The Nation" (cir. 20,000) (04/09)

"Many had hoped that as a result of the policy review, the Obama
Administration would change the Bush-era shock and awe strategy.
What one finds is that the new Administration is determined to
follow in the footsteps of its predecessor, landing itself in a cul
de sac as before. The recourse to the familiar carrot and stick
policy won't help. No government that compromises on national
sovereignty for the lure of enhanced American aid can survive
long."

"Stop Drone Attacks And Give Technical Assistance," an editorial in
the leading mass circulation centrist Urdu daily "Jang" (cir.
300,000) (04/09)

"We see a crisis of confidence if we keep in perspective the U.S.
and NATO military officials statements on ISI and Pakistan Army....
Various aspects of this trust deficit should be pondered over by
U.S. and Pakistani administrations and a joint strategy should be
prepared.... American think-tanks and intelligence organizations
are cognizant of the fact that these [drone] attacks are increasing
Pakistanis hatred against America. Actually, presence of foreign
forces and their action anywhere never solved problems."

"Drone Attacks: Debate In Parliament Needed," an editorial in the
center-right Urdu daily "Pakistan" (cir. 10,000) (04/09)

"Pakistan has rejected American proposal for joint military
operation against terrorism and militancy in Pakistani tribal areas
near the Afghan border.... Both the American officials visited with
the notion of speaking sternly with Pakistani political and military
leadership in order to pressurize Pakistan for doing more against
terrorism. Not only Pakistani leadership strongly reacted to this
notion, but also sternly rejected the U.S. allegation that Pakistani
elements are providing protection to some Taliban elements and
encouraging them to attack NATO forces."

"Pak-U.S. Relations And Demands Of The Situation," an editorial in
liberal Urdu daily "Express" (cir. 100,000) (03/09)

"Pakistan has rejected the U.S. proposal for a joint operation in
the tribal areas and even on the drone attacks it has made clear to
the U.S. that this policy in fact strengthening the extremists....
As far as U.S. allegations go, one aspect of this is that India and
Afghanistan want to exert pressure on the U.S. to somehow weaken
ISI. They know that ISI is working for Pakistan's interests and is
defending the country on several fronts. No country, including the
U.S., can be permitted to hurl allegations against our
institutions.... The U.S. must now understand that future relations
between the two countries will depend on mutual respect and trust."

"Correct Response To American Authorities," an editorial in the
Lahore-based independent Urdu daily "Din" (circ. 5000) (03/09)

"It is clear from the meetings between Pakistani and U.S. officials
that the U.S. is not satisfied at the level of Pakistan's
cooperation [against terrorism]. The U.S. feels that no option
other than the drone attacks can stop the tribal militants from
becoming a threat to America. The fact, however, is that the method
America is adopting to eliminate its enemies is immediately creating
new enemies for Pakistan. Pakistan cannot reject this option for
very long. Pakistan immediately needs to adopt a policy against
terrorism that is workable, satisfies the U.S., eliminates the
militants and has national consensus."
"Review Policies," an editorial in the Lahore-based populist
center-right Urdu daily "Khabrain" (cir. 50,000) (03/09)

"The shape of the new U.S. policy is very clear from statements made
by U.S. representatives. Firstly, America has made up its mind that
the solution to the Afghan war lies not in Afghanistan but Pakistan.
In other words, Pakistan will be the center of the war on terror and
this war will be fought on Pakistani soil.... The excuse will be
Baitullah Mehsud and Al Qaeda leadership, but the actual target will
be Pakistan's nuclear weapons."

"U.S. Should Respect Pakistan's Sovereignty," an editorial in the
Hyderabad-based independent Sindhi Daily "Kawish" (Cir. 105,000)
(04/09)

"Even the second visit of U.S. special envoy Richard Holbrooke to
Pakistan has not helped resolve continued drone attack issue.
Though the U.S. has declared Pakistan as a non-NATO ally but the
level of trust is such that it refused to give these drones to
Pakistan for furthering anti-terror agenda. The only feasible way
for fighting terrorism now seems to be that the U.S. should equip
Pakistani army so that Pakistan could act itself while the U.S.
should respect Pakistan's sovereignty."

"U.S. Attacks To Continue," an editorial in the Karachi-based
right-wing pro-Jamaat-e-Islami Urdu daily "Jasarat" (cir. 3,000)
(04/09)

"U.S. special envoy for region Richard Holbrooke and Gen. Mike
Mullen visited Pakistan to tell us that drone attacks would continue
and that US army is going to buy 50 additional spy jets to speed up
the attacks and that the day may not be far off when Balochistan too
would be under attack on pretext of Al-Qaeda and Taliban presence
there."

"America Suffers Isolation," an editorial in the Hyderabad-based
liberal and independent Sindhi Daily "Ibrat" (Cir. 80,000) (04/09)

"Pakistan has rightly rejected the U.S. suggestion for joint
operations in FATA. One should not even imagine that Pakistan would
allow foreign armies to use its territory. U.S. is perceived in the
world to be a country which is self-centered, and always promoting
its own interests thereby ignoring the concerns of other
countries."

"New Afghan Policy And Richard Holbrooke's Visit," an editorial in
Karachi-based pro-left and secular Sindhi Daily "Awami Awaz" (Cir.
70,000) (04/9)

"It gives people a sense of satisfaction that our government has a
clear position on drone attacks and they presented their point of
view courageously during their meetings with U.S. high officials.
We expect that government would be successful in convincing the
Obama administration to end drone attacks because it is in the
interest of both the countries."

"Undue U.S. Pressure," an editorial in the Lahore-based liberal
English daily "The Post" (cir. 5,000) (04/09)

"The clear stance taken by the Pakistan government is an unexpected
occurrence for the U.S. officials.... The tone and tenor of the
U.S. officials is objectionable given Pakistan's total support to
the war on terror. In the past, the Pakistan governments bent over
backwards to defend the drone attacks and played down their impact.
The U.S. has exploited the situation a bit too much.... The U.S.
should understand that it is dealing with a democratic government in
Pakistan that is responsible and is answerable to the people."

"America's Deepening Interest In FATA," an editorial in the
Islamabad-based rightist English daily "Pakistan Observer" (cir.
5,000) (04/09)

"Visit to Islamabad by Holbrooke and Admiral Mullen was basically
aimed at pressurizing Pakistan to agree to the air operations in
FATA by offering in return economic and security assistance....
Instead of using bullying tactics, it would be more appropriate if
United States trust to the commitments of the political, military
and intelligence leadership of Pakistan as nothing else would work
to eradicate terrorism."
"U.S.-Pak: Agreeing To Disagree," an editorial in the Lahore-based
liberal English language daily "Daily Times" (cir. 10,000) (04/09)

"Is this the parting of the ways? No, if you read into Foreign
Minister Qureshi's announcement that discussion of the "differences"
will be carried forward in the Afghan-Pak-US talks coming in the
first week of May in Washington. Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani
rallied behind his foreign minister by saying that Pakistan was
capable of defeating terrorism, although the world is yet to see the
first demonstration of this capacity. There was a promise of
retreat from partnership in this as he complained of the non-receipt
of the pledged $1.5 billion meant for setting up special industrial
zones in the tribal areas.
The two sides are definitely testing each other on their separate
needs to remain inside the anti-terror alliance."

"Obama's New Strategy," an op-ed by Tariq Fatemi in the
Karachi-based center-left independent national English daily "Dawn"
(cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"Obama's new strategy represents the beginning of a new and
concerted effort to increase pressure on Pakistan. That is
Holbrooke's likely mission, he has warned that U.S. patience is
wearing thin, but he should know that Pakistan is more important to
the U.S. than Afghanistan.... There are no easy solutions for
either the U.S. or Pakistan. Both are paying the price of colossal
errors and lapses."

"The CIA's Footprints," an op-ed by Ahmed Quraishi in the centrist
national English daily "The News" (cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"The CIA faces its toughest test yet to prove wrong the suspicions
of many within the Pakistani strategic community that some of the
terrorism exported from Afghan soil into Pakistan has direct or
indirect support from Washington.... In 2002, the Americans were
allowed to establish bases in Balochistan and CIA was given the
right to recruit Pakistanis in the tribal belt. These two areas of
Pakistan are now the most disturbed parts of our country. And now
our territory is being used to attack the interests of Iran and
China. Washington is creating conditions across our western belt
that would make it impossible for China to pursue trade and energy
corridors through Pakistan."

"'I've Got To Run': Holbrooke's Sham Press Conference," news
commentary by Qudssia Akhlaque in the centrist national English
daily "The News" (cir. 55,000) (04/09)

"U.S. Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke's much awaited first press
conference in Islamabad on Tuesday turned out to be an utter
anti-climax, if not a sham, with the unaccommodating American
diplomat not conceding an inch to the curious Pakistani media....
Holbrooke, who was here on his second visit since assuming his new
position, was put on the defensive by Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood
Qureshi's uncharacteristically hard-hitting opening statement in
which for the first time Pakistan-U.S. sharp differences on key
issues, particularly the drone strikes, surfaced loud and clear.
Holbrooke seemed disconcerted by Qureshi's straight talk in the open
about the existing irritants in the ongoing cooperation in the war
on terror between the two allies."

"Are U.S. And Pakistan Parting Ways?," a news analysis by Hamid Mir
in the centrist national English daily "The News" (cir. 55,000)
(04/09)

"Despite all the Pak-U.S. misunderstandings, I am hopeful that we
can move forward together with a new agenda with new priorities. I
am hopeful because lot of young American students told me that they
wanted peace not war. Many of them condemned the U.S. drone attacks
in the Pakistani tribal areas because these attacks were a violation
of the international law. They wanted to separate fiction from
reality. We can definitely make each other secure by identifying
the real problems with right solutions.
Patterson