Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09HANOI286
2009-03-30 09:18:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Hanoi
Cable title:  

HANOI COURT REJECTS CATHOLICS' APPEAL

Tags:  KIRF PHUM VM 
pdf how-to read a cable
O 300918Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9395
INFO AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L HANOI 000286 


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/30/2019
TAGS: KIRF PHUM VM
SUBJECT: HANOI COURT REJECTS CATHOLICS' APPEAL

REF: A. A) 2008 HANOI 1093

B. B) HO CHI MINH CITY 158

Classified By: A/DCM Brian Aggeler, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L HANOI 000286


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/30/2019
TAGS: KIRF PHUM VM
SUBJECT: HANOI COURT REJECTS CATHOLICS' APPEAL

REF: A. A) 2008 HANOI 1093

B. B) HO CHI MINH CITY 158

Classified By: A/DCM Brian Aggeler, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) Summary: With hundreds of Roman Catholics rallying
outside the courthouse and a very heavy police presence, a
Hanoi court on March 27 upheld the December 2008 convictions
of eight Thai Ha parishioners on charges of property damage
and disturbing public order during vigils in protest over
disputed land. PolCouns, along with Swedish, Swiss and Czech
diplomats, was permitted to observe the proceeding via
television monitor in an adjoining room. Despite a vigorous
defense and spirited testimony by the parishioners, the
five-hour trial ended with a fifteen minute break for
deliberation before the guilty verdict was upheld. End
summary.


2. (SBU) The eight defendants had been convicted of knocking
down a section of a wall during peaceful protests on land
once attached to the Thai Ha church in Hanoi in August 2008
(Ref A). Seven had received suspended prison terms and one
was given a warning.


Unanswered Question: Where's Lawyer Luat?
--------------


3. (SBU) In the March 27 appeal trial, the defense argued
that the trial should not proceed without the participation
of lead defense attorney Le Tran Luat, who was prevented from
attending the trial by security personnel in Ho Chi Minh City
(Ref B). After several aborted attempts by Luat to travel to
Hanoi, the Ninh Thuan provincial Bar Association revoked his
law firm's license on March 23, alleging tax and
administrative irregularities in the operations of his branch
offices. Luat has denied the violations.


4. (SBU) Lead Judge Nguyen Quoc Hoi said Luat had been
informed of the trial date and given all the necessary
paperwork to represent his clients. Despite repeated
questions from the defense, Hoi would not directly address
the issue of why Luat was not present and finally, in an
unusually candid moment, declared that Luat,s absence would
have no bearing on the outcome of the trial.

Praying for Authorities to See the Light...
--------------


5. (SBU) The Court called witnesses who cited complaints by
neighbors about the traffic jams and noise caused by the
church land protests, which they alleged had made it
impossible for children to study or workers to do their jobs.
The Defense complained that it had not been able to call any
witnesses of its own, and cited the lack of any solid
evidence of the noise level.


6. (SBU) The Defense argued that the total damage to the wall
had been estimated at approximately three million dong (about
USD 180) so it was hardly worth trying eight people for it.
The defendants admitted destroying the three-meter section of
wall, but all said they were convinced that it had been
illegally built on church property.


7. (SBU) The People's Procuracy cited the ordinance against
holding religious services outside religious sites to declare
that the church protests had been illegal. The defendants
responded that there had been no formal church service, only
prayers, which are legal everywhere. Asked what they were
praying for, one defendant said they were praying for the
government to receive enlightenment.


8. (SBU) After the five-hour trial, the panel of three judges
and two lay assessors took just fifteen minutes with a
verdict upholding the earlier convictions of the eight.
Outside, several hundred rallying Roman Catholics waved palm
fronds during the trial, but were kept well away from the
courthouse by a heavy security presence. When the defendants
emerged after the trial they were cheered by the crowd, which
was restrained by scores of security personnel.

Trial Rallies Church Supporters
--------------


9. (C) The court's rejection of the appeal was hardly a
surprise. Yet even with the light sentences the defendants
received, their standing and support for the church's land
claims among fellow Catholics was clearly raised by the
appeals trial. The arguments made by the Defense clearly had
resonance among the defendants and their fellow Catholics,
even if they were largely ignored by the court. That the GVN
took major steps to prevent lawyer Luat from attending a
trial whose verdict was a foregone conclusion is perhaps an
indication of just how much the authorities are worried by
the impact of these proceedings and the masses of popular
support for the defendants they can generate.


10. (U) This cable was coordinated with ConGen HCMC.


MICHALAK