Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09GENEVA195
2009-03-06 19:31:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
US Mission Geneva
Cable title:  

SOUTH AFRICAN DIPLOMAT DISAPPOINTED WITH SAG'S

Tags:  PHUM PREL ZA UNHRC 
pdf how-to read a cable
R 061931Z MAR 09
FM USMISSION GENEVA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 8100
INFO AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
C O N F I D E N T I A L GENEVA 000195 


NOFORN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/05/2019
TAGS: PHUM PREL ZA UNHRC
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICAN DIPLOMAT DISAPPOINTED WITH SAG'S
TRADITIONAL "PARTNERS"

Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Mark J. Cassayre, reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L GENEVA 000195


NOFORN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/05/2019
TAGS: PHUM PREL ZA UNHRC
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICAN DIPLOMAT DISAPPOINTED WITH SAG'S
TRADITIONAL "PARTNERS"

Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Mark J. Cassayre, reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary. A USDel member met with South African
Political Human Rights Officer Sybil Matlhako (please
protect) on March 2. A normally guarded Matlhako surprised
us with her willingness to speak candidly about group
dynamics and actions of the Chinese, Cubans, Europeans and
Palestinians. She suggested that the African Group (AG)
would begin to share with the USG its drafts on technical
assistance to AG member countries well before the drafts were
tabled. On Mexican PermRep de Alba's attempt to forge a
compromise on the Durban Review Text, Matlhako was scathing.
Mathalko pressed USDel on possible reform of the HRC, stating
that South Africa wanted to work closely with the USG. End
Summary.


2. (C) In a candid and warm meeting, South Africa's
principal negotiator on human rights issues at the UN Human
Rights Council, Sybil Matlhako, spoke at length on South
African observations regarding the behavior of other
delegations, disappointments South Africa has had with the UN
Human Rights Council and South Africa's desire to renew its
relationship with the USG on human rights issues and work
closely together. Matlhako welcomed USG re-engagement in the
UN Human Rights Council.


3. (C/NF) Matlhako said that the Cuban delegation had been
passive since Cuba had its country mandate removed. "The
south is unhappy with them," she said, citing the HRC special
session on food, at which Cuba "sounded like Europeans" when
speaking to G-77 delegations about resolution language. Many
in the G-77 speculated that Cuba had made a deal to be less
obstructionist in exchange for the removal of the country
mandate on Cuba, Matlhako said. Members of the G-77 also
noted that Cuba had begun to act somewhat differently in the
run-up to its Universal Periodic Review and that "the south
was unimpressed" by Cuba's behavior. China, like Cuba, had
been "oddly passive" since the creation of the HRC. Matlhako
had no speculation on the reason behind Chinese behavior but
was very clear that China had not been supporting G-77
initiatives. The Palestinian delegation, said Matlhako had
been obviously and hopelessly divided between its Hamas and

Fatah representatives in the last special session on
Israel/OPT (Note: We have neither previously heard of Hamas
representatives in the Palestinian Observer Mission, nor do
we know if this accurate. End note.). "We are getting tired
of them," she said noting that the HRC could not be expected
to resolve political issues. Matlhako had harsh words for
the Europeans. "They don't keep their word," she said,
further noting that with the EU, "we never know what their
bottom line is; it's not like dealing with the U.S. You tell
us what you mean and you don't lie about it."


4. (C/NF) Turning to racism, USdel expressed the desire to
work with South Africa, to the extent possible on the racism
text so as to demonstrate USG desires to express its
commitment to fighting racism. Matlhako responded that the
text would be mostly procedural. The eminent persons working
group had met only once and just in this past year and had
been "inspiring." South Africa wanted the group to present a
report and hoped, now that it had met, the group could be
useful in focusing States on racism. Matlhako went on to say
that when South Africa did the substantive resolution, it
would want to welcome progress in the United States. The
election of President Obama and the appointment of Attorney
General Holder were watershed moments South Africa wished to
honor. USDel suggested that perhaps a generic paragraph on
political participation might be the best way to approach
South African desires to welcome progress in the United
States. Matlhako said they would need to think about the
best way to handle it as Australia has been a bit of a lesson.
(Note: South Africa welcomed the Australian apology to
aboriginals in the last racism resolution. Australia had no
real issues with the welcome, but European delegations fought
the reference. End note.)


5. (C/NF) Asked about Mexican PermRep de Alba's suggested
plan to negotiate a Durban Review text, Malthako sputtered.
South Africa disliked his instruction package for the HRC,
where he "met in secret with a few groups." The process was
not transparent and not helpful. De Alba "is not
trustworthy" she said. Malthako thought that any package de
Alba may try on Durban review would be "DOA." (Note: De Alba
has subsequently denied he has plans to table a draft. End
note.)


6. (C/NF) Matlahako went on at some length regarding South
African unhappiness with the institution building package de
Alba had brokered. The SAG did not like the process for
selecting special rapporteurs as it is not transparent. It
was unhappy with the way the code of conduct was done. When
asked why South Africa did not support Canada on its
objection to the package, Matlhako said, but "we could not
agree with them because of the politics." She seemed
surprised, as if the idea had not occurred to her, when USdel
noted that South Africa did not have to agree with the
politics if it had agreed that the adoption process was
improper. USDel encouraged her to speak with us if other
such issues arise and that together our delegations may be
able to find a way to prevent such procedural irregularities
in future. Matlhako responded that South Africa wanted to
work closely with the United States on reform of the HRC and
indeed work closely with the United States on the substantive
issues where our governmen
ts do agree.


7. (C) USDel asked about South African attitudes on
technical assistance resolutions and what may happen with the
Democratic Republic of the Congo in the March HRC session.
Matlhako said that South Africa wanted technical assistance
resolutions that did not name and shame and that did actually
do something useful. She said the AU would a have text on
the DRC and that South Africa would begin to share such texts
with the USG well in advance now that we were back in the
Council. "We want to make sure we have considered and to the
extent we can included USG views in texts" before the AU
presents them.


8. (C) Comment. USDel was struck by the openness and candor
of Matlhako, who is usually guarded, as well as her
enthusiasm about the USG decision to reengage. Her candor on
the behavior of other delegations was unprecedented, as is
the offer to share AU texts before they are negotiated.
Although she may have been speaking in a personal capacity on
some of these issues and may not be able or willing to change
SAG positions, USdel will try to build on this relationship
in the hopes of gaining better insights into SA positions and
potentially finding ways to breach the divides between the
U.S. and the SAG on human rights issues in Geneva. End
Comment.


STORELLA