Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09GENEVA1236
2009-12-20 20:25:00
SECRET
Mission Geneva
Cable title:  

START FOLLOW-ON NEGOTIATIONS, GENEVA

Tags:  KACT MARR PARM PREL RS US START 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0002
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHGV #1236/01 3542025
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 202025Z DEC 09
FM USMISSION GENEVA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1038
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/VCJCS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 6097
RHMFISS/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE IMMEDIATE
RUENAAA/CNO WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/DIRSSP WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
INFO RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA PRIORITY 3276
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 2286
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 7493
S E C R E T GENEVA 001236 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR T, VCI AND EUR/PRA
DOE FOR NNSA/NA-24
CIA FOR WINPAC
JCS FOR J5/DDGSA
SECDEF FOR OSD(P)/STRATCAP
NAVY FOR CNO-N5JA AND DIRSSP
AIRFORCE FOR HQ USAF/ASX AND ASXP
DTRA FOR OP-OS OP-OSA AND DIRECTOR
NSC FOR LOOK
DIA FOR LEA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/19/2019
TAGS: KACT MARR PARM PREL RS US START
SUBJECT: START FOLLOW-ON NEGOTIATIONS, GENEVA
(SFO-GVA-VII): (U) DEFINITIONS WORKING GROUP MEETING,
DECEMBER 16, 2009

Classified By: A/S Rose E. Gottemoeller, United States
START Negotiator. Reasons: 1.4(b) and (d).

S E C R E T GENEVA 001236

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR T, VCI AND EUR/PRA
DOE FOR NNSA/NA-24
CIA FOR WINPAC
JCS FOR J5/DDGSA
SECDEF FOR OSD(P)/STRATCAP
NAVY FOR CNO-N5JA AND DIRSSP
AIRFORCE FOR HQ USAF/ASX AND ASXP
DTRA FOR OP-OS OP-OSA AND DIRECTOR
NSC FOR LOOK
DIA FOR LEA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/19/2019
TAGS: KACT MARR PARM PREL RS US START
SUBJECT: START FOLLOW-ON NEGOTIATIONS, GENEVA
(SFO-GVA-VII): (U) DEFINITIONS WORKING GROUP MEETING,
DECEMBER 16, 2009

Classified By: A/S Rose E. Gottemoeller, United States
START Negotiator. Reasons: 1.4(b) and (d).


1. (U) This is SFO-GVA-VII-155.


2. (U) Meeting Date: December 16, 2009
Time: 3:30 P.M. - 5:30 P.M.
Place: U.S. Mission, Geneva

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


3. (S) The Definitions Working Group met December 16, and
agreed to drop twelve terms ("Jamming," "Encapsulation,"
"ICBM or SLBM the final stage of which executes a procedure
for dispensing reentry vehicles," "Residual Propellant,"
"Payload," "Launch Weight," "Procedure for dispensing reentry
vehicles," "Rapid reload," "Long-range non-nuclear ALCM,"
"Nuclear armaments weapons storage area," "Non-deployed heavy
bomber," "Existing type") and to send seven terms to the
Conforming Group ("Deployed Heavy Bomber," "Facility," "Fixed
Structure for Mobile Launchers of ICBMs," "Inspection
Activity Site," "Inspection Site," "Storage facility,"
"Version").


4. (S) SUBJECT SUMMARY: Agreed To Drop; Sent To
Conforming; and Additional Discussions

--------------
AGREED TO DROP
--------------


5. (S) The Definitions Working Group agreed to drop twelve
terms because they were not needed to support the treaty or
protocol text. The seven telemetry-related terms were not
pertinent to the U.S. telemetry proposals being negotiated:
"Jamming", "Encapsulation", "ICBM or SLBM the final stage of
which executes a procedure for dispensing reentry vehicles",
"Residual propellant", "Payload", "Launch weight", and
"Procedure for dispensing reentry vehicles". The terms
"encryption" and "telemetric information" were likely to be
needed for the U.S. proposed telemetry provisions so they

were left for a future working group meeting.


6. (S) Other terms were dropped for the following reasons:

-- "Rapid reload" will be incorporated in the agreed
statement that uses the term;

-- "Existing types" are clearly listed in Article III,
so the term need not be defined;

-- "Long-range non-nuclear ALCM" is not used in the
treaty or protocol text;

-- "Nuclear armaments weapons storage area" did not
need further explanation; and

-- "Non-deployed heavy bombers" was no longer in the
treaty text.

--------------


SENT TO CONFORMING
--------------


7. (S) The following terms were sent to the Conforming
Group:

-- The term "deployed heavy bomber" means a heavy
bomber equipped for nuclear armaments, other than a test
heavy bomber.

-- The term "facility" means an ICBM base, submarine
base, air base, maintenance facility, basing area, silo
launcher group, ICBM loading facility, SLBM loading facility,
production facility, repair facility, storage facility,
training facility, conversion or elimination facility, test
range, heavy bomber flight test center, or space launch
facility.

-- The term "fixed structure for mobile launchers of
ICBMs" means a unique structure, within a basing area,
designed to contain mobile launchers of ICBMs.

-- The term "inspection activity site" means a
location at which inspections or exhibitions may be conducted.

-- The term "inspection site" means a location at
which Type One or Type Two inspections may be conducted.

-- The term "storage facility" means:

(a) for ICBMs or SLBMs, a specified facility, outside
an ICBM base, a submarine base, a test range, or a space
launch facility, for the storage of ICBMs or SLBMs;

(b) for mobile launchers of ICBMs, a specified
facility, outside an ICBM base, a test range, or a space
launch facility, for the storage of mobile launchers of ICBMs;

(c) for heavy bombers, a specified facility, outside an
air base, for the storage of heavy bombers.

-- The term "version" means, for mobile launchers of
ICBMs a classification, declared by the inspected party,
based on external differences from other such items.

--------------
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS
--------------


8. (S) Mr. Siemon raised the "new types" definition and
agreed to delete the part of the definition that dealt with
throw-weight. He asked the Russian side to study the
implications of their own proposal to reduce the size of the
change in length and diameter that would designate a new
type, with respect to Article 6 paragraph 2 of the INF
Treaty. The U.S. side was willing to accept the proposed
changes but wanted to ensure that it did not put Russia in
violation of the INF Treaty.


9. (S) ADM Kuzntsov was unwilling to drop the terms
"missile-defense interceptor", "missile-defense system" or
"launcher of missile-defense interceptors" while Article V on
prohibitions was still being discussed by the heads of


delegations.


10. (S) The discussion of the term "Nuclear armaments for
heavy bombers" resulted in Kuznetsov complaining at length
about U.S. and Russian disagreements on counting of nuclear
armaments. Siemon explained that this term was intended to
help ensure an honest count during inspections. No agreement
was reached.


11. (U) Documents provided: None.


12. (U) Participants:

UNITED STATES

Mr. Siemon
Dr. Dreicer
Ms. Stewart
Mr. Taylor
Mrs.Zdraveky
Mr. Bennett (Int)

RUSSIA

ADM Kuznetsov
Ms. Fuzhenkova
Col Kamenskiy
Ms. Melikbekian
Mr. Pogodin (Int)


13. (U) Gottemoeller sends.
GRIFFITHS