Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09FREETOWN103
2009-03-17 18:00:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Freetown
Cable title:  

JUSTICE QUESTIONS KEMOH SESAY'S INVOLVEMENT WHILE

Tags:  PGOV SNAR KJUS SL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1968
RR RUEHPA
DE RUEHFN #0103/01 0761800
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 171800Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY FREETOWN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2530
INFO RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 FREETOWN 000103 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR AF/W (JHUNTER/ESPRUILL)
EMBASSY LOME (SWALKE) PLEASE PASS TO INL CN TEAM
(TSCARANTINO)
DOJ FOR DEA/OS/OSE (MCMANAMON/LENARTOWICZ)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV SNAR KJUS SL
SUBJECT: JUSTICE QUESTIONS KEMOH SESAY'S INVOLVEMENT WHILE
END OF TRIAL LOOMS

REF: A. 08 FREETOWN 389

B. FREETOWN 78

Classified By: Ambassador June Carter Perry for reasons 1.4 (b/d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 FREETOWN 000103

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR AF/W (JHUNTER/ESPRUILL)
EMBASSY LOME (SWALKE) PLEASE PASS TO INL CN TEAM
(TSCARANTINO)
DOJ FOR DEA/OS/OSE (MCMANAMON/LENARTOWICZ)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV SNAR KJUS SL
SUBJECT: JUSTICE QUESTIONS KEMOH SESAY'S INVOLVEMENT WHILE
END OF TRIAL LOOMS

REF: A. 08 FREETOWN 389

B. FREETOWN 78

Classified By: Ambassador June Carter Perry for reasons 1.4 (b/d)


1. (C) Summary: Two of the accused in the ongoing cocaine
trial had their charges dismissed on March 16, an additional
sign that the case is quickly being brought to a close. Civil
Aviation employees Badara Allieu Tarawalley and Ebenezer
Adetunji Macauley were released based on the lack of evidence
linking them to conspiracy and accessory charges. The justice
presiding over the case has intensified the schedule,
requesting that the defense team rests its case on or around
March 21. He also made some provocative comments about the
alleged involvement of former Minister of Transport Ibrahim
Kemoh Sesay (reftel A),suggesting that he should have been
charged in the case. This kind of public commentary on Kemoh
Sesay by a respected judge could push the government to seek
a "solution" to the problem posed by the former Minister, who
was likely protected by officials as highly-placed as the
President himself. End Summary.


2. (U) Justice Nicholas Browne-Marke, stated on March 16 that
he questioned the Department of Public Prosecution's (DPP)
decision to neither charge nor call Kemoh Sesay as a witness.
The 13th accused, Civil Aviation Authority employee
Tarawalley, stated in his submission that Kemoh Sesay had
given the go-ahead to issue a landing permit for the plane.
Browne-Marke thus stated that Kemoh Sesay should have either
been called as a witness to refute this testimony, or been
charged himself. Tarawalley's testimony also revealed that he
protected the former Minister in previous statements, and
Browne-Marke noted that suborning an individual to commit
perjury is a crime.


3. (U) Tarawalley and Macauley were acquitted on all charges
on March 16, and Browne-Marke determined that the remaining
accused will face their respective charges. Browne-Marke also
ruled that Count V, Conspiracy to Import Prohibited Drugs
Without Lawful Authority Contrary to Law, is appropriate and
that the defendants have a case to answer for. Various

defense team members had previously argued that the DPP had
failed to prove conspiracy, and that it should be dismissed
because many of the defendants had not known one another
prior to their arrests, and thus could not be involved in a
"conspiracy." Browne-Marke will not rule on guilt or
innocence related to the charge until the defense case is
closed, but ruled against the defense argument that there
were no grounds for the conspiracy charge.


4. (C) Significantly, Browne-Marke urged the defense team to
close their case by March 21. He implied that he believes
they are deliberately delaying the case for their own
purposes, when he is aware that the evidence has been
sufficiently presented already. Court will now sit every day
until the defense closes. How long Browne-Marke will take to
render a judgment is unclear, but his decisions thus far have
been rendered expeditiously. Based on his recent judgment
related to Tarawalley and Macauley's acquittal, he seems to
already be laying the groundwork for the final decisions.
Though he ruled that conspiracy is an appropriate charge, he
also stated in court on March 14 that the DPP had by and
large failed to prove that case. He also dropped Count I,
Accesory Before the Fact to the Importation of Cocaine, for
Hassan Karim Mansaray, Patrick Moriba Johnson, and Mohamed
Musa Kamara on March 16, but said that Ahmed Sesay must face
the charge. His statements about the charge and Sesay largely
implied that he believes the evidence demonstrates that Sesay
is guilty. There is a strong appearance that Browne-Marke has
already reviewed the case before him, and made his decisions.
If so, he may be prepared to submit his judgment on or
shortly after the closure of the defense case.


5. (C) Comment: Browne-Marke seems poised to end this case as
quickly as possible, necessitating further bilateral
discussions between post and State House to ensure that the
promise to honor the expulsion requests is kept (reftel B).
Emboffs held informal discussions with a highly-placed State
House official on March 16, and expect further information on
March 18. Browne-Marke's comments about Kemoh Sesay are in
many ways surprising; he halted and struck from the record a
statement made earlier in the trial by Alimamy Kabia,
implicating Kemoh Sesay in the conspiracy. Though it is
unlikely that Kemoh Sesay will be charged for this crime in a
Sierra Leonean court in the future, Browne-Marke's statement
puts the government and those who may be protecting Kemoh

FREETOWN 00000103 002 OF 002


Sesay on notice that evidence suggesting his complicity is
now a matter of public record. This could increase the
Government of Sierra Leone's amenability to expelling Kemoh
Sesay, should he be indicted in a U.S. court. Post will
continue to keep Department and DEA officials apprised of
progress in the case, and the need for action, when
warranted. End Comment.
PERRY