Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09DUBLIN59
2009-02-09 17:07:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Dublin
Cable title:  

IRELAND'S COMMENTS ON THE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

Tags:  AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHDL #0059/01 0401707
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 091707Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
TO RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0614
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9752
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0201
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0029
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0230
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 000059 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR ISN/MNSA, GENEVA (CD),UNVIE (IAEA),USUN
(POL),USNATO (POL),AND USEU (POL)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2019
TAGS: AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA
IAEA, NPT, EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND'S COMMENTS ON THE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
TREATY (NPT)

REF: STATE 6970

Classified By: Acting PEO Chief Dwight Nystrom. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 000059

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR ISN/MNSA, GENEVA (CD),UNVIE (IAEA),USUN
(POL),USNATO (POL),AND USEU (POL)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2019
TAGS: AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA
IAEA, NPT, EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND'S COMMENTS ON THE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
TREATY (NPT)

REF: STATE 6970

Classified By: Acting PEO Chief Dwight Nystrom. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).


1. (C) Summary: On February 6, PolOff met with Derek Hannon,
Deputy Director of the Disarmament and Non-Proliferation
section of the DFA. Hannon noted that Ireland did not, at
present, have detailed "informed views" on the NPT, but he
did share Ireland's views on the issues submitted in reftel.
He expressed optimism regarding President Obama's recent
statements and noted that the EU and Ireland look to America
to be a leader in this effort. End Summary.


2. (C) Responses to specific questions are listed below:


A. What are Ireland's objectives for the NPT in general,
and for the current review process in particular?

Hannon stressed that Ireland does not have any official
objectives with regard to the review process as of yet. He
indicated that thus far, review conferences have appeared to
be ineffective, but that Ireland remains hopeful that their
effectiveness will improve. He added that Ireland's position
will be in line with that of the EU.


B. What policies or actions regarding the NPT does Ireland
hope to see from the United States?

Hannon lauded recent comments by the Obama Administration.
In particular, the move to take weapons off of Trigger Alert.
Ireland hopes that the United States will ratify the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). Hannon added that the
United States must take the lead in effective disarmament and
he suggested that the US ratification of this treaty would
encourage the Chinese, Indians, and Pakistanis to do the same.



C. What does Ireland believe would represent a successful
outcome to the current NPT cycle ending with the 2010 Review
Conference? How important is it for Parties to reach
consensus on substantive matters?

Ireland is hoping to see a renewed commitment to disarmament,
especially from nuclear weapons states, and a realistic time
table. Hannon added that the elimination of nuclear weapons
should be the end goal.


D. Does Ireland believe that NPT parties should take
action to address the NPT issues described below?

If so, what actions would it support?

-- Noncompliance with the NPT, e.g., on the part of Iran and
North Korea

Hannon stated that Iran and North Korea must live up to their
commitments and international obligations. Ireland has been
in support of previous sanctions but he cautioned that any
future sanctions would be at the discretion of the EU.

-- The prospect of Parties violating and then withdrawing
from the Treaty

Hannon noted that Ireland would like to see the NPT remain an
effective Treaty; however, in recent years its effectiveness
has been called into question. Ultimately, Ireland remains
committed to disarmament, whether through the continuation of
the NPT or a newer, more effective approach.

-- The lack of NPT universality

Mr. Hannon agreed that the NPT is virtually universal, but
expressed concern that India, Israel, and Pakistan are not
party to the Treaty. Ireland would like to see these
countries sign the Treaty, but acknowledged that this is
unlikely to occur in the near future.

-- The lack of universality of NPT safeguards agreements and
the Additional Protocol

Ireland would like to see all states sign the safeguards.
Hannon commented that nuclear weapons are viewed as a prized
commodity, or a trophy, which in turn makes more states
desire to have them, and ultimately makes the world less safe

-- The spread of enrichment and reprocessing capabilities to
additional countries

With regard to the Nuclear Fuel Bank, Ireland favors the
international regulation that the Bank provides. Hannon
commented that these regulations serve as a disincentive for
states to develop their own nuclear power. Ireland supports
the right for states to access nuclear power, but only if it
is regulated.

-- Fulfilling the Treaty's obligations to pursue negotiations
relating to nuclear disarmament

Ireland strongly supports disarmament.

-- Transparency on the part of nuclear weapon states with
regard to their nuclear weapons forces and policies

Transparency is crucial to the process. Hannon stated that
there is a need for more transparency, which entails honesty,
verification of nuclear numbers, and trust (he pointedly
noted that Russia was a case where these virtues were
lacking). He argued that without this, there cannot be any
real progress.
FAUCHER