Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09COLOMBO977
2009-10-22 06:06:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Colombo
Cable title:  

OFFICIALS DEFEND INCREASE IN DEFENSE BUDGET

Tags:  PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6672
OO RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHLM #0977/01 2950606
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 220606Z OCT 09 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0665
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 1972
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 9008
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 7246
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 5172
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3393
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 5127
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0001
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0662
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 4238
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 9571
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 6866
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO PRIORITY 1333
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 3785
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000977 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/08/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: OFFICIALS DEFEND INCREASE IN DEFENSE BUDGET
SPENDING

REF: A. SECSTATE 107719

B. COLOMBO 943

COLOMBO 00000977 001.6 OF 002


Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000977

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/08/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: OFFICIALS DEFEND INCREASE IN DEFENSE BUDGET
SPENDING

REF: A. SECSTATE 107719

B. COLOMBO 943

COLOMBO 00000977 001.6 OF 002


Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)


1. (C) SUMMARY: Ambassador and PolOff separately delivered
ref A demarche points on increases in the Sri Lankan defense
budget to senior officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(MFA),the Ministry of Finance, and the Army General Staff.
The consistent response was that the increase was due
primarily to the government's need to pay down debts the
military had incurred during the last several intense months
of the conflict with the LTTE. While this may explain much
of the defense budget increase, post believes some also is
due to planned increases in the troop levels and base
construction tied to the GSL's regaining of sovereignty in
the previously LTTE-occupied north. END SUMMARY.


2. (C) In an October 20 meeting with Ambassador, MFA
Secretary Romesh Jayasinghe responded to the demarche
explaining that many ministries exceeded allocated budgets
and requested supplementary increases to compensate for the
deficit. He noted that the MFA had exceeded its budget,
requiring a supplemental allocation, and now MOD was doing
the same to cover war-time deficit expenditures. PolOff
received a similar response from MFA Director General of the
Americas Department Kshenuka Seniweratne, who argued the
defense budget was not forward spending but rather meant to
cover shortfalls. She noted the intensity of military
actions during the final five months of the conflict had led
MOD to overextend.


3. (C) Ministry of Finance Secretary PB Jayasundera also told
Ambassador that the defense increase was for previously
incurred expenses from the end of the war and that any claim
that the GSL was increasing defense spending was unfounded.
Jayasundera claimed defense spending was 3.8 percent of GDP
in 2009 but would fall to 3.5 percent in 2010 and remained
under the projected budget ceiling. (NOTE: According to
embassy calculations, defense spending with the supplemental
would be approximately 4.3 percent of GDP in 2009. END
NOTE.) He pointed out that the military was engaged in many
non-military functions in the north, such as police work and
reconstruction, which he expected would be soon taken over by
civilian authorities. Jayasundera also noted that 70 percent
of military expenses were for salaries. The military had
also canceled some of its arms procurement orders once the
war ended.


4. (C) Arguing as well that much of the defense-budget
increase was meant for obligations from past purchase
contracts, CHOD Fonseka told Ambassador the government had
MOD a one-year grace period, but now payments had to be made
and would continue in some cases until 2020. Fonseka
emphasized that the government also had to pay survivors'
compensation to families who had lost soldiers in the
fighting and compensation to veterans who had been severely
wounded and medically boarded out of the military. The
military also had to pay substantial recurring costs for
rations and fuel.


5. (C) COMMENT: It appears that much of the Sri Lankan
defense budget increase may be due to repayment of
expenditures incurred during the final months of the conflict
with the LTTE. Nevertheless, the military is on record with
proposals for a net increase of approximately 25,000 troops.
We believe that this troop increase -- as well as the
construction of new bases in the north in previously occupied
LTTE territory -- probably account for some portion of the
defense-budget increase. What we do not know for certain is

COLOMBO 00000977 002.2 OF 002


what portion of the increase is due to debt payment and what
is due to new troops and bases. Therefore, while we remain
concerned about the increased defense spending, our concerns
have been reduced because it appears that the lion's share of
the 2009 defense supplemental pertains to repayment of
expenses incurred at the end of the war, not new military
plans.
BUTENIS