Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09COLOMBO895
2009-09-18 11:59:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Colombo
Cable title:
UN PASCOE TAKES GSL AT ITS WORD ON IDP RETURNS
how-toVZCZCXRO9027 OO RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR DE RUEHLM #0895/01 2611159 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 181159Z SEP 09 FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0542 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 1908 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 8937 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 7175 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 5132 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3314 RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 5088 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1365 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0623 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 4198 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 9502 RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 6803 RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO PRIORITY 1294 RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 3739 RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000895
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: UN PASCOE TAKES GSL AT ITS WORD ON IDP RETURNS
COLOMBO 00000895 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000895
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: UN PASCOE TAKES GSL AT ITS WORD ON IDP RETURNS
COLOMBO 00000895 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) On September 18 UN Under-Secretary General for
Political Affairs Lynn Pascoe gave a briefing for the
Colombo-based diplomatic community, reviewing his visit here
over the past two days. He and locally-based UN senior staff
visited a demining site in Mannar, an IDP camp and a
rehabilitation site in Jaffna, and the Manik Farm IDP camp.
In Colombo he met with various officials from the Government
of Sri Lanka (GSL) including the President and Senior
Presidential Advisor Basil Rajapaksa. Pascoe told the
assembled diplomats that he came to the country to find out
why so little progress had been made on returns of IDPs since
the end of the war. Now after two days of meetings and
visits, he said he was more assured that the GSL had a
coherent plan to return IDPs to their homes, and while still
perhaps excessively concerned about security screening, the
GSL was genuinely committed to returning 70-80% of the IDPs
by January.
2. (C) Pascoe said that prior to his arrival here he
believed demining was just the excuse the GSL was giving for
not returning IDPs. After his meeting with Basil Rajapaksa
and seeing the extensive mined areas in Mannar, he was more
convinced that the GSL was focusing on demining and really
did need all the help the international community could give
them, including for the purchase of additional flail demining
machines. On the possibilities of increased freedom of
movement and releasing the IDPs to host families, Pascoe said
their team had pressed hard on the government, offering food
aid and other assistance for these sorts of steps, but that
the GSL had excuses for why this would not work well. Pascoe
said he believed better progress would be made if the
international community continues pushing the GSL to return
people home more quickly rather than trying to relocate them
to host families or to press for freedom of movement. He
said the GSL ruled out any plan which might result in the
IDPs coming to Colombo. When A/DCM asked what the UN policy
is of providing humanitarian support to close camps, Pascoe
and UN Resident Representative Neil Buhne said the UN had not
cut off food and humanitarian aid in any similar situation in
many years, although they did oppose providing assistance to
any new closed camps.
COMMENT
--------------
3. (C) Pascoe gave the appearance of having taken the GSL,
and Basil Rajapaksa in particular, more or less at their word
on IDP returns issues. He appeared to accept the GSL's
statement, also communicated yesterday by the President to
the newly credentialed Ambassadors, that 70-80% of IDPs would
in fact be returned by January 2010. While he believed the
GSL's reasons for continuing to keep the IDPs in camps were
security concerns prior to the election and legitimate
demining concerns, he made no mention of the fact that the
GSL did not come close to delivering on any of its IDP
returns promises for the month of August, and is now quickly
running out of time to meet any of its reconfigured goals for
the month of September. Pascoe had a meeting immediately
following the briefing, and A/DCM did not have any
opportunity for a pull-aside with him to express Post's
concerns about the GSL's ability to deliver. There was
considerable concern expressed privately after the briefing
among several of the assembled diplomats about Pascoe's
conclusions regarding the real situation on the ground and
the small likelihood that the GSL can meet its goal of 70-80%
returns by January, regardless of whether it genuinely
intends to or not. While Post hopes Pascoe is correct in his
apparent trust, the slow pace of decongesting Manik Farm is
COLOMBO 00000895 002.2 OF 002
not encouraging.
BUTENIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: UN PASCOE TAKES GSL AT ITS WORD ON IDP RETURNS
COLOMBO 00000895 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) On September 18 UN Under-Secretary General for
Political Affairs Lynn Pascoe gave a briefing for the
Colombo-based diplomatic community, reviewing his visit here
over the past two days. He and locally-based UN senior staff
visited a demining site in Mannar, an IDP camp and a
rehabilitation site in Jaffna, and the Manik Farm IDP camp.
In Colombo he met with various officials from the Government
of Sri Lanka (GSL) including the President and Senior
Presidential Advisor Basil Rajapaksa. Pascoe told the
assembled diplomats that he came to the country to find out
why so little progress had been made on returns of IDPs since
the end of the war. Now after two days of meetings and
visits, he said he was more assured that the GSL had a
coherent plan to return IDPs to their homes, and while still
perhaps excessively concerned about security screening, the
GSL was genuinely committed to returning 70-80% of the IDPs
by January.
2. (C) Pascoe said that prior to his arrival here he
believed demining was just the excuse the GSL was giving for
not returning IDPs. After his meeting with Basil Rajapaksa
and seeing the extensive mined areas in Mannar, he was more
convinced that the GSL was focusing on demining and really
did need all the help the international community could give
them, including for the purchase of additional flail demining
machines. On the possibilities of increased freedom of
movement and releasing the IDPs to host families, Pascoe said
their team had pressed hard on the government, offering food
aid and other assistance for these sorts of steps, but that
the GSL had excuses for why this would not work well. Pascoe
said he believed better progress would be made if the
international community continues pushing the GSL to return
people home more quickly rather than trying to relocate them
to host families or to press for freedom of movement. He
said the GSL ruled out any plan which might result in the
IDPs coming to Colombo. When A/DCM asked what the UN policy
is of providing humanitarian support to close camps, Pascoe
and UN Resident Representative Neil Buhne said the UN had not
cut off food and humanitarian aid in any similar situation in
many years, although they did oppose providing assistance to
any new closed camps.
COMMENT
--------------
3. (C) Pascoe gave the appearance of having taken the GSL,
and Basil Rajapaksa in particular, more or less at their word
on IDP returns issues. He appeared to accept the GSL's
statement, also communicated yesterday by the President to
the newly credentialed Ambassadors, that 70-80% of IDPs would
in fact be returned by January 2010. While he believed the
GSL's reasons for continuing to keep the IDPs in camps were
security concerns prior to the election and legitimate
demining concerns, he made no mention of the fact that the
GSL did not come close to delivering on any of its IDP
returns promises for the month of August, and is now quickly
running out of time to meet any of its reconfigured goals for
the month of September. Pascoe had a meeting immediately
following the briefing, and A/DCM did not have any
opportunity for a pull-aside with him to express Post's
concerns about the GSL's ability to deliver. There was
considerable concern expressed privately after the briefing
among several of the assembled diplomats about Pascoe's
conclusions regarding the real situation on the ground and
the small likelihood that the GSL can meet its goal of 70-80%
returns by January, regardless of whether it genuinely
intends to or not. While Post hopes Pascoe is correct in his
apparent trust, the slow pace of decongesting Manik Farm is
COLOMBO 00000895 002.2 OF 002
not encouraging.
BUTENIS