Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09CHENNAI284
2009-09-02 09:19:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Chennai
Cable title:  

INDIA'S FIRST LUNAR ORBITER MISSION SUFFERS PREMATURE

Tags:  TSPA PREL EIND SENV IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6696
OO RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHDH RUEHHM RUEHLH RUEHLN RUEHMA
RUEHNEH RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHPW RUEHSL RUEHTM RUEHTRO
DE RUEHCG #0284 2450919
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 020919Z SEP 09
FM AMCONSUL CHENNAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2459
INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3842
RHMCSUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDC/NOAA WASHDC
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS CHENNAI 000284 

STATE FOR OES/PCI, OES/STC, OES/SAT, OES/EGC, AND SCA/INS
STATE FOR STAS
STATE PASS TO NSF FOR INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS
STATE FOR SCA, OES (STAS FEDOROFF); OES/PDAS/RHARNISH; OES/PCI
STEWART; OES/IHB MURPHY; OES/GTHOMPSON
STATE FOR EEB/DAVID HENRY
PASS TO MAS/DAS/JESTRADA
PASS TO MAC/DAS/HVINEYARD
PASS TO NSF/MLUECK
PASS TO NASA/OER (MCINTOSH/WILLIAMS/KAMM)
SLUG TO DOE/DAS/JMIZROCH; DOE/MGINZBERG
SLUG TO DOE/ (TCUTLER/GBISCONTI/CGILLESPIE)

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA PREL EIND SENV IN

SUBJECT: INDIA'S FIRST LUNAR ORBITER MISSION SUFFERS PREMATURE
FAILURE

REF: A) NEW DELHI 2641, B) CHENNAI 356

UNCLAS CHENNAI 000284

STATE FOR OES/PCI, OES/STC, OES/SAT, OES/EGC, AND SCA/INS
STATE FOR STAS
STATE PASS TO NSF FOR INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS
STATE FOR SCA, OES (STAS FEDOROFF); OES/PDAS/RHARNISH; OES/PCI
STEWART; OES/IHB MURPHY; OES/GTHOMPSON
STATE FOR EEB/DAVID HENRY
PASS TO MAS/DAS/JESTRADA
PASS TO MAC/DAS/HVINEYARD
PASS TO NSF/MLUECK
PASS TO NASA/OER (MCINTOSH/WILLIAMS/KAMM)
SLUG TO DOE/DAS/JMIZROCH; DOE/MGINZBERG
SLUG TO DOE/ (TCUTLER/GBISCONTI/CGILLESPIE)

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA PREL EIND SENV IN

SUBJECT: INDIA'S FIRST LUNAR ORBITER MISSION SUFFERS PREMATURE
FAILURE

REF: A) NEW DELHI 2641, B) CHENNAI 356


1. (U) The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) experienced
abrupt loss of radio contact with its Chandrayaan-1 (C-1) lunar
orbiter at 0130 local on August 29. ISRO Director Madhavan Nair
told the press later that day that ISRO had terminated the mission.
The spacecraft had completed 312 days in orbit since its launch on
October 22, 2008 (reftels),and was expected to serve for two years.
Nair said that the mission had nonetheless completed 90 to 95
percent of its scientific objectives, which mainly involved a
detailed mapping of the moon. He added that the craft had already
sent some 70,000 images of the moon back to ISRO's command center
near Bangalore and had collected data on the chemical and mineral
content of the moon's soil. ISRO officials did not announce an
official cause of the orbiter's failure, but a spokesperson
speculated that that the terminal failure was due to the loss of
power supply to on-board computers that controlled the telemetry and
telecommand communications with ground control, rendering the
orbiter unable to communicate.


2. (SBU) C-1 experienced a serious of glitches following its launch
last year. As early as a month into the launch, various electronic
sub-systems apparently experienced greater-than-expected stress due
to radiation. This led to the failure of some equipment, requiring
the craft to orbit the moon from a greater distance than previously
planned. ISRO's engineers (with some assistance from NASA and its
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, we've heard from some non-ISRO sources)
were able to create workarounds for these problems, however, until
the fatal failure on August 29. The launch and initial success of
Chandrayaan-1 remains a source of pride for India, and its loss is a
significant disappointment. Planning for a Chandrayaan-2 mission,
which will involve landing a rover on the moon, is already well
under way and slated for a launch in 2012 or 2013. ISRO will hope
to use the lessons of C-1 to improve its capabilities for C-2.

Comment
--------------


3. (SBU) One slightly troubling aspect of the C-1 experience is that
ISRO did not disclose publicly any problems until May 2009, nearly
six months after the initial failures of some systems. The
organization's leaders, whose conversations with outsiders
consistently stress its "indigenous" capabilities, tend to play down
the amount of assistance the C-1 mission has received from other
space agencies. The reality is that the involvement of agencies
like NASA was critical for the success of the mission, but there has
been little if any public acknowledgement of the contributions of
any agency other than ISRO. One hopes that as ISRO becomes more
confident of its own impressive (and very cost-effective)
capabilities, it will be more willing to publicize its cooperation
with other organizations.


SIMKIN