Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09CHENNAI226
2009-07-13 04:21:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Chennai
Cable title:
GREENPEACE DISRUPTS BIOTECH RICE TRIALS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
how-toVZCZCXRO5517 RR RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW DE RUEHCG #0226 1940421 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 130421Z JUL 09 FM AMCONSUL CHENNAI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2378 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3770 INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0060 RUEHFT/AMCONSUL FRANKFURT 0364
UNCLAS CHENNAI 000226
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON SENV PGOV EINV IN GM
SUBJECT: GREENPEACE DISRUPTS BIOTECH RICE TRIALS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
UNCLAS CHENNAI 000226
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON SENV PGOV EINV IN GM
SUBJECT: GREENPEACE DISRUPTS BIOTECH RICE TRIALS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
1. (SBU) Summary: Activists from the environmental group Greenpeace
on June 22 raided a field in Andhra Pradesh's Medak district (45 km
north of Hyderabad) to protest against crop trials involving biotech
rice conducted by Bayer CropScience (headquartered in Germany). The
activists scaled the fence surrounding the field and displayed
posters and other paraphernalia criticizing biotech products,
intending to draw press and public attention to the trials. A local
Bayer representative told us that the company had received all
necessary permissions for the trials, but local government officials
told us that they were unaware of them. It appears that Bayer
received approval at the national level, but that there is no
mechanism in place to transfer awareness of such approvals to the
state level. End Summary.
Greenpeace raids biotech crop trials
--------------
2. (U) Greenpeace activists on June 22 raided a field in
Chinnakanjarla village (Andhra Pradesh) owned by Bayer Cropscience,
scaling the wall surrounding the field and displaying posters and
other paraphernalia condemning biotech products and suggested the
alleged dangers they bring. A local Greenpeace official told us
that the event was "an effort to raise awareness among the local
farming community on the dangers posed by agricultural biotech
companies." He also said that trials of biotech products could
"shut Indian rice out of the international market." Bayer
Cropscience's private security guards escorted the activists off the
premises and the company filed a formal trespass complaint at the
local police station.
Bayer says it did nothing wrong
--------------
3. (SBU) A top Bayer CropScience official told us that the company
had received the necessary clearance for the trial of biotech rice
at the site from the Government of India's Genetic Engineering
Approval Committee (GEAC). He added that the company had taken
steps (like building the wall around the site) to ensure that the
trial would not contaminate other crops in the area. Another Bayer
official speculated that Greenpeace was perturbed by the company's
outreach efforts to local farmers. He explained that Bayer had
brought several groups of farmers on educational tours of the site,
and that Greenpeace activists believed that such tours were a form
of manipulation intended to create a more favorable political/social
climate for the introduction of biotech crops.
Andhra Pradesh government caught unaware
--------------
4. (SBU) One of the more curious twists to this episode is that
local officials were caught completely off-guard, unaware that
Bayer's trial was taking place. Dr. Raghava Reddy, a member of
Andhra Pradesh's Biotechnology Coordination Committee (and Vice
Chancellor of Hyderabad's Ranga Agricultural University) told us
that GEAC had not informed his committee about Bayer's trials. Our
contacts within the state's Agriculture Department were similarly
unaware, and told us that they -- prompted by press reports of the
Greenpeace raid -- were checking with national authorities to
determine whether or not Bayer had actually received GEAC approval.
He added that his department was "drafting a report" on the
situation, presumably in an effort to examine why local officials
were unaware of Bayer's trial.
Comment
--------------
5. (SBU) We have no reason to doubt Bayer's claims that it received
all appropriate approvals from GEAC. We find it somewhat surprising
that a company of Bayer's international reputation apparently did
not think it advantageous to communicate its plans to local
authorities. Environmental activists have staged protests against
biotech products -- and the companies researching them -- before,
and we would have thought that Bayer would have been sensitive to
potential security issues, requiring the cooperation of local
government. It is also instructive, but perhaps less surprising,
that the GEAC appears to have no mechanism in place for notifying
state or local governments about crop trials it has approved. End
Comment.
SIMKIN
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON SENV PGOV EINV IN GM
SUBJECT: GREENPEACE DISRUPTS BIOTECH RICE TRIALS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
1. (SBU) Summary: Activists from the environmental group Greenpeace
on June 22 raided a field in Andhra Pradesh's Medak district (45 km
north of Hyderabad) to protest against crop trials involving biotech
rice conducted by Bayer CropScience (headquartered in Germany). The
activists scaled the fence surrounding the field and displayed
posters and other paraphernalia criticizing biotech products,
intending to draw press and public attention to the trials. A local
Bayer representative told us that the company had received all
necessary permissions for the trials, but local government officials
told us that they were unaware of them. It appears that Bayer
received approval at the national level, but that there is no
mechanism in place to transfer awareness of such approvals to the
state level. End Summary.
Greenpeace raids biotech crop trials
--------------
2. (U) Greenpeace activists on June 22 raided a field in
Chinnakanjarla village (Andhra Pradesh) owned by Bayer Cropscience,
scaling the wall surrounding the field and displaying posters and
other paraphernalia condemning biotech products and suggested the
alleged dangers they bring. A local Greenpeace official told us
that the event was "an effort to raise awareness among the local
farming community on the dangers posed by agricultural biotech
companies." He also said that trials of biotech products could
"shut Indian rice out of the international market." Bayer
Cropscience's private security guards escorted the activists off the
premises and the company filed a formal trespass complaint at the
local police station.
Bayer says it did nothing wrong
--------------
3. (SBU) A top Bayer CropScience official told us that the company
had received the necessary clearance for the trial of biotech rice
at the site from the Government of India's Genetic Engineering
Approval Committee (GEAC). He added that the company had taken
steps (like building the wall around the site) to ensure that the
trial would not contaminate other crops in the area. Another Bayer
official speculated that Greenpeace was perturbed by the company's
outreach efforts to local farmers. He explained that Bayer had
brought several groups of farmers on educational tours of the site,
and that Greenpeace activists believed that such tours were a form
of manipulation intended to create a more favorable political/social
climate for the introduction of biotech crops.
Andhra Pradesh government caught unaware
--------------
4. (SBU) One of the more curious twists to this episode is that
local officials were caught completely off-guard, unaware that
Bayer's trial was taking place. Dr. Raghava Reddy, a member of
Andhra Pradesh's Biotechnology Coordination Committee (and Vice
Chancellor of Hyderabad's Ranga Agricultural University) told us
that GEAC had not informed his committee about Bayer's trials. Our
contacts within the state's Agriculture Department were similarly
unaware, and told us that they -- prompted by press reports of the
Greenpeace raid -- were checking with national authorities to
determine whether or not Bayer had actually received GEAC approval.
He added that his department was "drafting a report" on the
situation, presumably in an effort to examine why local officials
were unaware of Bayer's trial.
Comment
--------------
5. (SBU) We have no reason to doubt Bayer's claims that it received
all appropriate approvals from GEAC. We find it somewhat surprising
that a company of Bayer's international reputation apparently did
not think it advantageous to communicate its plans to local
authorities. Environmental activists have staged protests against
biotech products -- and the companies researching them -- before,
and we would have thought that Bayer would have been sensitive to
potential security issues, requiring the cooperation of local
government. It is also instructive, but perhaps less surprising,
that the GEAC appears to have no mechanism in place for notifying
state or local governments about crop trials it has approved. End
Comment.
SIMKIN