Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09CAIRO1997
2009-10-20 15:09:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Cairo
Cable title:  

ACTIVISTS' ANGER OVER U.S. POSITION ON GOLDSTONE REPORT

Tags:  PREL PGOV PHUM KPAL UN IS EG 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4791
RR RUEHROV
DE RUEHEG #1997/01 2931509
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 201509Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY CAIRO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3939
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0457
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0314
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 CAIRO 001997 

SIPDIS

FOR NEA/ELA, DRL/NESCA AND IO/RHS
NSC FOR KUMAR

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2029
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PHUM, KPAL, UN, IS, EG
SUBJECT: ACTIVISTS' ANGER OVER U.S. POSITION ON GOLDSTONE
REPORT

REF: CAIRO 1834

Classified By: Economic-Political Minister-Counselor
Donald A. Blome for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 CAIRO 001997

SIPDIS

FOR NEA/ELA, DRL/NESCA AND IO/RHS
NSC FOR KUMAR

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2029
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PHUM, KPAL, UN, IS, EG
SUBJECT: ACTIVISTS' ANGER OVER U.S. POSITION ON GOLDSTONE
REPORT

REF: CAIRO 1834

Classified By: Economic-Political Minister-Counselor
Donald A. Blome for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

1. KEY POINTS

-- (C) Following the UN Human Rights Council's (UNHRC)
October 2 deferral of action on the Goldstone Report, human
rights contacts expressed to us privately their deep
disappointment in the U.S. position on the report.

-- (U) On October 2, the Cairo Institute for Human Rights
Studies (CIHRS),which closely follows the UNHRC, issued a
mixed public statement that praised U.S.-Egyptian cooperation
on the freedom of expression resolution, but criticized the
U.S. position on Goldstone. Other NGOs were largely silent
in public.

-- (SBU) On October 17, following U.S. opposition to the
UNHRC October 16 resolution on the report, a coalition of
NGOs, many of whom are hostile toward USG policy, issued an
inflammatory public statement criticizing U.S. "bias" toward
an Israeli "government of murderers."

2. (C) Comment: Muted NGO public criticism of the U.S.
following the October 2 UNHRC deferral came in the context of
commentary in the pro-government and independent press that
blamed the Palestinians and the "Arab countries," along with
the U.S. and Israel. However, much of the press'
post-October 16 reporting criticized the U.S. vote against
the UNHRC resolution, including one pro-government paper's
condemnation of the U.S. as "corrupt." As press attention
began to focus on the U.S., the NGO coalition's shrill
criticism of the U.S. was generally consistent with
prevailing press sentiments. End comment.

-------------- ---
Contacts' Disappointment over Goldstone Deferral
-------------- ---

3. (C) Following the October 2 UNHRC deferral, our human
rights contacts who most carefully watch the UNHRC privately
criticized the U.S. position on Goldstone. Egyptian
Initiative for Personal Rights Executive Director Hossam
Bahgat called U.S. policy on the report "sad and
unfortunate," and asserted that the U.S. "gave up a tool" to
pressure Israel into negotiations. He claimed that the U.S.
position undermined internat
ional justice, and showed that
the U.S. values Israel's political needs over those of the
Palestinians and other Arabs. Bahgat rejected DRL A/S
Posner's references at the UNHRC to Israel's democratic
system as irrelevant to Israel's human rights violations. We
responded that the U.S. is working with Israel and the
Palestinian Authority to re-start negotiations as soon as
possible, and that the U.S. is encouraging domestic
investigations of human rights violations.

4. (C) Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
Director Bahey Al-Din Hassan charged the U.S. with having a
double-standard for Israel. He called for immediate
follow-up on Goldstone in the UN, saying that Israel should
not be treated differently than "other human rights
violators." He made the same point as Bahgat that the U.S.
missed an opportunity to press Israel into negotiations.
Both Hassan and Bahgat said Israeli Prime Minister
Netanyahu's public comments on the report reminded them of
Sudanese President Bashir's warning that UN steps against him
would jeopardize the Sudanese peace process. Hassan charged
that U.S. support for Israel on the report weakened U.S.
standing as a defender of human rights.

5. (SBU) CIHRS issued a mixed public statement October 2 that
criticized the UNHRC's deferral of action on the Goldstone
Report, and praised U.S.-Egyptian cooperation on the freedom
of expression resolution. The statement asserted: "In
effect, Israel and the U.S. have once again worked together
to ensure international impunity for war crimes committed in
Gaza by Israeli forces." Other NGOs were largely silent in
public over the UNHRC October 2 deferral.

-------------- --
Anger at U.S. Vote against Goldstone Resolution
-------------- --

6. (C) Following U.S. opposition to the October 16 UNHRC

CAIRO 00001997 002 OF 002


Goldstone resolution, a coalition of 12 Egyptian NGOs issued
an October 17 public statement entitled, "Adopting the
Goldstone Report: a blow to the government of murderers in
Israel, exposing the ugly bias of the American Government."
The statement accuses the U.S. of "hostility to international
justice," and speculates that Israel "would not have
continued to disregard the principles of justice and
international law without the support of the U.S.
government." It concludes by asserting that a possible U.S.
veto in the UN Security Council would "exceed" the actions of
"the American war criminals led by Dick Cheney and Donald
Rumsfeld." (Note: Many of the statement's signatories are
credible organizations that are well known to us. We have
direct contact with several of these NGOs, but others refuse
to meet with us over their opposition to U.S. policy. End
note.) On October 19, an official from one signatory
organization, The Hisham Mubarak Law Center, privately
asserted to us that the U.S. position on Goldstone
demonstrated that the U.S. has no concern for human rights.
Scobey