Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BUJUMBURA306
2009-07-08 15:37:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bujumbura
Cable title:  

RUDUDURA AWAITS A NEW HEARING IN A NEW COURT,

Tags:  PGOV PHUM BY 
pdf how-to read a cable
P 081537Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY BUJUMBURA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1584
INFO RWANDA COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BUJUMBURA 000306 


LONDON, PARIS, PLEASE PASS TO AF WATCHERS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/07/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM BY
SUBJECT: RUDUDURA AWAITS A NEW HEARING IN A NEW COURT,
WITHOUT NEW HOPE

REF: A. BUJUMBURA 266

B. BUJUMBURA 141

Classified By: Charge JoAnne Wagner for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L BUJUMBURA 000306


LONDON, PARIS, PLEASE PASS TO AF WATCHERS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/07/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM BY
SUBJECT: RUDUDURA AWAITS A NEW HEARING IN A NEW COURT,
WITHOUT NEW HOPE

REF: A. BUJUMBURA 266

B. BUJUMBURA 141

Classified By: Charge JoAnne Wagner for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (U) In a very quiet, unpublicized decision on June 15,
Burundi's anti-corruption court ruled that it does not have
the authority to try the case of Juvenal Rududura, the labor
union vice-president charged with defamation of the president
who has languished in prison since September 15, 2008 (ref
A). The public prosecutor appealed the ruling to the Supreme
Court on June 23. The Supreme Court is the same court that
originally approved Rududura's pre-trial detention, despite
his protests that the charges and detention are unwarranted.


2. (C) COMMENT: Despite press coverage and civil society
interest in Rududura's case since his arrest, including at
his June 8 hearing, the anti-corruption court's decision
occurred without press coverage and without notice by civil
society. The court decision seems oddly under the radar --
the court did not even call Rududura to come hear the ruling
(while it is not mandatory that a defendant be present at a
ruling, it is customary). In addition, it is mandatory that
the defendant be notified in writing of a decision; Rududura
was not. To date, he still has not received official notice
of the anti-corruption court's ruling nor the prosecutor's
appeal.


3. (C) According to Rududura, the Minister of Justice is
using this case to seek revenge for Rududura's 2008 statement
to the press that those seeking jobs in the Ministry of
Justice must pay about one million Burundian francs (USD 810)
to high-ranking Ministry staff to obtain a position (ref B).
The unorthodox handling of Rududura's case lends some
plausibility to Rududura's claims that someone is pursuing a
vendetta. For example, prosecutor Godence Ndayizeye is
reportedly a personal friend of the Minister; the
prosecutor's appeal to the Supreme Court did not include
notification to the defendant, though this is required by
law; and the President of the Supreme Court is keeping the
case file himself, which is atypical in Burundi's legal
process. Post will continue to visibly monitor Rududura's
case and to urge the GoB to conduct a fair trial without
further delay. END COMMENT.

Wagner