Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BRUSSELS865
2009-06-24 09:21:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

BELGIUM'S JUSTICE MINISTRY REACTS TO 2009 TIP

Tags:  KTIP KWMN KPAO PGOV PHUM PREL AE BE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7610
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHBS #0865/01 1750921
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 240921Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9108
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI 0843
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 000865 

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

STATE PASS G/TIP AND EUR/WE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/22/2021
TAGS: KTIP KWMN KPAO PGOV PHUM PREL AE BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM'S JUSTICE MINISTRY REACTS TO 2009 TIP
REPORT

REF: STATE 60473

Classified By: Richard M. Eason for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 000865

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

STATE PASS G/TIP AND EUR/WE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/22/2021
TAGS: KTIP KWMN KPAO PGOV PHUM PREL AE BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM'S JUSTICE MINISTRY REACTS TO 2009 TIP
REPORT

REF: STATE 60473

Classified By: Richard M. Eason for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D).


1. (U) This is an action request. Please see paragraph 7.


2. (C) Summary: Poloff and Polintern delivered reftel
Trafficking in Persons (TIP) report to the Justice Minister's
Diplomatic Advisor Ambassador Marc Van den Reeck and
Trafficking in Persons Coordinator Paule Somers on June 15.
Both Van den Reeck and Somers were pleased that Belgium
received a Tier 1 ranking in the 2009 report. However, they
raised questions about the report's narrative for Belgium
under recommendations and in the prosecutions section. The
Belgians accepted the recommendation to improve data
collection. They were skeptical of the implicit link in the
narrative between exploitation of Bulgarian women, the claim
that Belgian police received sexual favors from the
Bulgarians' traffickers, and the need for training of judges.
Van den Reeck was amazed that the UAE sheikha case, in which
independent Belgian prosecutors investigated trafficking and
awarded her victims protected status, was cited in a way that
implied Belgium had not done enough. He said Belgium had
done more than most countries would in the same situation.
He asked that Belgium be evaluated next year on its broad
efforts, which he considered as strong, and not on individual
cases. He suggested that to reduce Belgium's rating because
the U.S. is not satisfied with the outcome of two individual
cases would undermine the credibility of the TIP report
itself. Van den Reeck asked that Belgium's efforts at the EU
level and its plans to focus on TIP during its 2010 EU
presidency be considered as evidence Belgium places a
priority on fighting TIP. Finally, he repeated a request for
TIP best practices and information sharing on TIP that he
made to Poloff in January. End Summary.

Recommendations
--------------


3. (SBU) Van den Reeck and Somers accepted the TIP report's
recommendation that Belgium improve its collection of

relevant TIP data, and asked for clarification on the
perceived need for additional anti-trafficking training for
officials. Van den Reeck was well aware of Belgium's data
problem, and said the GOB was in the process of digitizing
judicial data. Somers considered the call for additional
training for officials as vague. She asked what kind of
officials and what type of training were recommended. She
believes that the GOB provides sufficient training on TIP.

Prosecutions
--------------


4. (C) Ambassador Van den Reeck was concerned about the
wording in the prosecutions section of the narrative. He was
puzzled by the reference to an NGO that claimed traffickers
of Bulgarian women provided sexual favors to police, followed
by a sentence stating that judges and other officials would
benefit from further training. He and Ms. Somers argued that
there was no apparent link between the two. Van den Reeck
was also concerned about the treatment of the UAE sheikha
case in the TIP report. He considered that it placed
Belgium's effort in a negative light, when in fact Belgium's
independent prosecutors had done more than most countries
would. He said he would instruct the Belgian Ambassador in
the UAE to contact U.S. Embassy Abu Dhabi to understand
better how the U.S. deals with the international travel of
Gulf Arab royal family members. Van den Reeck previously
served as the Belgian ambassador in Abu Dhabi, and said the
case would be better explored in the context of the UAE
rather than Belgium. Van den Reeck observed that Belgium's
efforts at combating TIP were quite strong and were a
priority for his minister. He suggested that downgrading
Belgium next year if these two cases were not resolved to the
State Department's satisfaction would undermine the TIP
report's credibility.


5. (SBU) Van den Reeck asked for greater cooperation and
information sharing on TIP. Poloff said he would relay the
message, but noted that G/TIP had asked what kind of best
practices and at what level the GOB would like information
when he had asked before. Van den Reeck also asked that
Belgium's leadership on TIP issues in the Benelux group and
its preparations for the 2010 EU presidency be taken into
consideration in the next TIP report. He said TIP was a
Belgian priority. Belgium would be holding a Benelux meeting
on TIP cooperation in the next year, and the GOB would make

BRUSSELS 00000865 002 OF 002


combating TIP an EU-wide focus in 2010. Poloff commended
Belgium on its regional and European efforts, but pointed out
that international cooperation was not a factor in TIP
rankings.

Prevention
--------------


6. (C) Poloff explained that prevention campaigns aimed at
customers of Belgium's legal prostitution trade were
important to Post, EUR, and G/TIP, and that no such demand
reduction efforts were observed in Belgium. Van den Reeck
asked if the U.S. had data it could share that would indicate
that red-light zone clientele were receptive to
anti-prostitution advertisements and what forms these
campaigns took in other countries where prostitution was
legal.

Comment and Action Request
--------------


7. (C) Van den Reeck and Somers offered a very frank
analysis of Belgium's TIP report evaluation. Though happy
Belgium remained in Tier 1, they were concerned that the
outcome of two cases mentioned in the narrative might become
litmus tests to evaluate Belgium, rather than having the
report focus on the global reality that Belgium places a
priority on TIP at home and leads on TIP in Europe. On the
sheikha case in particular, Van den Reeck considered that
Belgium's independent judiciary had set an example that few
other countries, including the U.S., could match, and felt
strongly it should have been commended as a breakthrough in
the report. He repeated a request to share best practices he
had made to Poloff in January. Post requests Department
provide information to answer the GOB's questions on best
practices on TIP and the paragraph 6 question on demand
reduction.

BUSH
.