Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BRUSSELS491
2009-04-02 14:42:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

BELGIUM:USG CANDIDACY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Tags:  PHUM PREL BE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0009
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBS #0491 0921442
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 021442Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8799
INFO RUEHZJ/HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COLLECTIVE
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0102
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 000491

SIPDIS

STATE PASS EUR/WE, EUR/PGI, IO/RHS, AND DRL/MLGA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/29/2019
TAGS: PHUM PREL BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM:USG CANDIDACY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

REF: A. STATE 31175

B. SECTO 27

Classified By: Political Economic Counselor Richard Eason for reasons 1
.4 (B) and (D).

(C) Poloff delivered ref A points April 1 to MFA Director for
Human Rights France Chainaye. Chainaye said Belgium was
pleased that the U.S. was running for the UN Human Rights
Council (UNHRC),and referred to the similar statement made
by Minister De Gucht when he met with Secretary Clinton (ref
B). When asked if Belgium would support the U.S. candidacy,
Chainaye said Belgium had already promised votes to Norway
and New Zealand. However, she said that New Zealand was
withdrawing its candidacy according to information from the
Belgian Embassy in Canberra, and that Belgium would be able
to support the U.S. once New Zealand formally withdrew. She
added that New Zealand was the obvious country to back out
with the U.S. announcement, and said that Belgium would not
have withdrawn in any case. She was hopeful strong U.S.
participation could help change the direction the UNHRC has
been heading, but said it would be hard work. She
acknowledged the U.S. and the EU had differences on certain
issues, but were partners for the most part in upholding
strong human rights standards.

BUSH
.