Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BRUSSELS1314
2009-09-30 06:06:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

BELGIUM'S PERSPECTIVE ON UNHRC

Tags:  PREL PHUM UN PINR BE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBS #1314/01 2730606
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 300606Z SEP 09 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9511
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1108
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0301
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 001314 

SIPDIS

STATE PASS EUR/WE, IO/RHS, DRL/MLGA, USUN-W FOR JENNIFER
SIMON, MISSION GENEVA FOR MARK CASSAYRE, ANNA CHAMBERS,
MELANIE KHANNA AND ANNA MANSFIELD, USUN/NEW YORK FOR CRAIG
KUEHL, JOHN SAMMIS AND LAURIE PHIPPS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/15/2019
TAGS: PREL PHUM UN PINR BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM'S PERSPECTIVE ON UNHRC

REF: A. BRUSSELS 292

B. BRUSSELS 491

Classified By: Robert Kiene for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 001314

SIPDIS

STATE PASS EUR/WE, IO/RHS, DRL/MLGA, USUN-W FOR JENNIFER
SIMON, MISSION GENEVA FOR MARK CASSAYRE, ANNA CHAMBERS,
MELANIE KHANNA AND ANNA MANSFIELD, USUN/NEW YORK FOR CRAIG
KUEHL, JOHN SAMMIS AND LAURIE PHIPPS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/15/2019
TAGS: PREL PHUM UN PINR BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM'S PERSPECTIVE ON UNHRC

REF: A. BRUSSELS 292

B. BRUSSELS 491

Classified By: Robert Kiene for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (U) This is an action request, please see paragraph six.


2. (U) Poloffs met July 13 with MFA Director for Human Rights
France Chainaye. Chainaye discussed Belgium's role as
President of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)
and the GOB's perspective on its work.


3. (U) Chainaye said Belgium had no choice but to run for the
Council once it became clear that there was no other viable
candidate from the Western European and Others Group (WEOG),
as the Netherlands and Italy were not eligible due to their
rejection of the Durban text. Belgium also stepped up to
ensure that a WEOG country would be elected President.
Belgium was not seeking this role when it ran for the UNHRC
because it felt it would be handicapped in pursuing its own
agenda by the neutral role required of the Council President.
Chainaye noted that the president of the council cannot
introduce measures or take an activist role. The GOB sees
its role as President as building alliances with moderates,
staying abreast of the positions of various countries and
factions, and trying to make council processes work.
Chainaye described this as "damage control," trying to keep
certain countries from undermining the UNHRC. She lamented
that Belgium must wait until its Presidency ends in 2010 to
use its final two years as a member of the Council to play
the activist role it had wanted. Chainaye said that despite
the recent change of Foreign Minister in Brussels, from
Karel De Gucht to Yves Leterme, there will be no change in
Belgium's strong support for human rights in international
fora. Chainaye is leaving the Human Rights Directorate to be
Belgium's Ambassador to UNESCO in Paris. Her replacement is
expected to be Marc Pecsteen, the current CG in Shanghai.


4. (C) When queried on Belgium's view of the UNHRC, Chainaye
said Belgium sees the UNHRC and the Third Committe as a
important vehicles for human rights. She commented on the
challenge that the three sessions of the UNHRC and the Third
Commiton with like-minded partneernational human rights .p@
`eh``hthe proce ss is
open Qs, specifically Cuba, lobby friendly, non-cfill the
docket during th singled out
Cuba's use Qant" strategy, whereby
several small Carribean nations filled most of the reviewing
slots right after the Cuban reception when the docket opened.
Thus, only a few challenging questions were asked by WEOG
and other like-minded countries that managed to get on the
tail-end of the docket.


5. (C) Chainaye reaffirmed Minister De Gucht's statement to
Secretary Clinton at their March meeting that Belgium is
pleased that the United States is on the UNHRC for the next
three years. She predicted the U.S., Belgium, and the E.U.
would be partners on most issues, but warned there might be
some disagreements on certain Middle East questions.


6. (C) ACTION REQUEST: The MFA asked for a list of U.S.
priorities and the U.S. evaluation of the UNHRC so far. Post
requests talking points and background we can provide to the
GOB by August 17. We should provide this information prior
to September for it to be useful in Belgian planning for the
fall human rights meetings. Post views this as an excellent
opportunity to share with the GOB U.S. UNHRC priorities and
the U.S. vision on human rights. The GOB is open to working
closely with us, and Post belives we should actively engage
them.
BUSH