Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BRATISLAVA232
2009-05-28 15:29:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bratislava
Cable title:  

LAJCAK CALLS IN CHARGE OVER EMBASSY'S STATEMENTS

Tags:  PREL PGOV KCOR LO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5044
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHSL #0232/01 1481529
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 281529Z MAY 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2512
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRATISLAVA 000232 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/28/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV KCOR LO
SUBJECT: LAJCAK CALLS IN CHARGE OVER EMBASSY'S STATEMENTS
ON SPECIAL COURT

REF: BRATISLAVA 221

Classified By: CDA Keith A. Eddins, for reasons 1.4 (b and d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRATISLAVA 000232

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/28/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV KCOR LO
SUBJECT: LAJCAK CALLS IN CHARGE OVER EMBASSY'S STATEMENTS
ON SPECIAL COURT

REF: BRATISLAVA 221

Classified By: CDA Keith A. Eddins, for reasons 1.4 (b and d)


1. (C) Summary: Slovak FM Lajcak called in Charge May 27 to
relay President Gasparovic's extreme displeasure over Embassy
Bratislava's recent public statements in which we expressed
regret at the demise of the Special Court for anti-corruption
cases. Lajcak said Gasparovic felt U.S. comments (as well as
similar remarks by the UK ambassador) represented verged on
interference in Slovakia's internal affairs and insisted that
the U.S. and UK chiefs of mission be informed of his
feelings. While expressing regret that Gasparovic had thus
interpreted the Embassy's statements, the Charge made clear
that the U.S. had been actively engaged in support of the
Slovak judicial sector since the mid-1990s. He explained
that U.S. comments on the important role played by the
Special Court were based on shared U.S.-Slovak international
legal and political commitments and also represented a
specific and definable U.S. interest in supporting American
investors in Slovakia who see the need for active
anti-corruption efforts. Lajcak -- whose heart was clearly
not in the demarche -- said he understood and quickly moved
on to other issues. End Summary.


2. (C) Slovak Foreign Minister Lajcak called Charge into the
MFA May 27 for a one-on-one discussion of the Slovak
Constitutional Court's recent decision that the
anti-corruption Special Court was unconstitutional (reftel
and previous). Making clear that he was acting under direct
instructions from President Gasparovic, Lajcak said the
President viewed Embassy Bratislava's May 20 statement on the
issue as verging on interference in Slovak internal affairs.
Lajcak explained that an angry Gasparovic -- who had called
Lajcak in Hanoi -- said that he could understand that Western
governments might have made such comments 10-15 years ago,
but that Slovakia was now a full member of NATO and the EU
and should not be treated in such a manner. Lajcak noted
that he just made a similar demarche to the UK Ambassador,
who had also displeased Gasparovic by publicly lamenting the
end of the Special Court.



3. (C) In reply, Charge expressed regret that the President
had interpreted the Embassy's statement -- a copy of which he
passed to Lajcak -- as somehow inappropriate. It should have
come as no surprise to the Slovaks, as the substance and
language were fully consistent with what we had been saying
in public and private ever since the question of shutting
down the Special Court's had arisen in late 2006. Moreover,
the U.S. had been involved with the Slovak judicial system
since the mid-1990s, pursuing a rule-of-law agenda that aimed
to help Slovakia meet the good-governance and anti-corruption
standards set by NATO and -- especially -- the EU. That
Slovakia has just celebrated its fifth anniversary as a
member of both institutions testified to the success we had
achieved cooperatively. In fact, the Charge noted, we have
continued to provide as much support as we can in the post-EU
membership world, sending Special Court judges,
anti-corruption prosecutors, and police investigators on a
specially-designed International Visitor Program as recently
as last fall.


4. (C) Charge further noted that as fellow members of the
OECD (and signatories of the OECD anti-bribery convention) we
shared a mutual commitment to ensure that our respective
counter-corruption systems met the highest possible
standards. As recently as last year, Slovakia had assured
the OECD working group on bribery that efforts to abolish the
Special Court had been suspended, just as Prime Minister Fico
had promised. Finally, Charge underscored the fact that U.S.
companies have invested more than $4 billion in Slovakia and
employ about 50,000 Slovak workers. As such, the Embassy had
a responsibility to American investors to call for a judicial
system that can address the very serious problems of
corruption and organized crime, which Lajcak himself has
acknowledged exist. Just as the EU, OECD, and Council of
Europe believe the Special Court has an important role to
play, so does the United States. To ignore the issue would
be to abrogate our responsibility to existing and potential
American investors.


5. (C) Lajcak said he fully understood why the U.S. had
commented on the case (and added that he, himself, did not
find the U.S. statement objectionable),but reiterated that
he was simply reporting President Gasparovic's concerns, as
he had promised the President he would do. He then proceeded
to outline the Fico government's plans to recreate the
Special Court in a form designed to meet the Constitutional
Court's objections. He said that Fico had been surprised and
dismayed by the Constitutional Court's decision and was
working hard to find a solution that preserved the Special
Court's functions. Charge said that the U.S. was aware of

BRATISLAVA 00000232 002 OF 002


the government's ongoing efforts, which we recognized were
being undertaken without any support from Fico's coalition
partners (HZDS, led by notorious ex-PM Vladimir Meciar, and
SNS, led by corrupt ultranationalist Jan Slota). Our
interest, the Charge concluded, was not in the specific form
a new counter-corruption court might take, but rather in its
ability to accomplish its mission. Lajcak agreed, and
expressed hope that a solution could be found that the U.S.
could publicly endorse. The discussion then moved on to
various other issues, including Afghanistan, the Balkans, and
Slovak-Hungarian relations (septel).


6. (C) Embassy Comment: Lajcak -- whose heart was obviously
not in the demarche -- made it very clear that he was
endeavoring to fulfill his President's request without
actually taking us to task. His words were carefully chosen
and his manner was open and friendly throughout the half-hour
discussion (only about 10 minutes of which was actually
devoted to the Special Court and other rule-of-law issues).
We are less sanguine than Lajcak, however, regarding the
follow-on court that the Fico government is rapidly moving to
establish. Significantly, Lajcak did not ask us to refrain
from further public comments on the issue and we certainly
will not hesitate to advocate key U.S. interests by urging
the Slovaks to honor their international anti-corruption
commitments. End Comment.
EDDINS