Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BERN362
2009-08-31 22:38:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bern
Cable title:  

NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) REVIEW

Tags:  AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0011
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSW #0362/01 2432238
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 312238Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6028
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2883
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0089
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0335
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0238
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERN 000362 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR ISN/MNSA (S.DAVIS/W.ALBERQUE) AND EUR/CE
(Y.SAINT-ANDRE); GENEVA (CD); UNVIE (IAEA),USUN (POL),
USNATO (POL),AND USEU (POL)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2019
TAGS: AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA
IAEA, NPT, SZ
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) REVIEW
CONFERENCE 2010: SWISS VIEWS AND POLICY-MAKING

REF: A. STATE 83600

B. BERN 342

C. BERN 108

Classified By: Acting POLE Counselor Chris Buck; reasons 1.4(b) and (d)
.

C O N F I D E N T I A L BERN 000362

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR ISN/MNSA (S.DAVIS/W.ALBERQUE) AND EUR/CE
(Y.SAINT-ANDRE); GENEVA (CD); UNVIE (IAEA),USUN (POL),
USNATO (POL),AND USEU (POL)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2019
TAGS: AORC CDG ENRG KNNP MNUC PARM PGOV PREL UNGA
IAEA, NPT, SZ
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) REVIEW
CONFERENCE 2010: SWISS VIEWS AND POLICY-MAKING

REF: A. STATE 83600

B. BERN 342

C. BERN 108

Classified By: Acting POLE Counselor Chris Buck; reasons 1.4(b) and (d)
.


1. (C) Summary: The Swiss government strongly supports entry
into force of the CTBT, negotiations on a verifiable FMCT,
and efforts to reinforce the NPT, particularly with regard to
disarmament and arms control issues. The Swiss welcome
U.S.-Russian nuclear disarmament negotiations, and are
convinced that near-term progress on U.S.-Russian nuclear
disarmament negotiations will be essential to setting the
stage for a successful NPT Review Conference in May 2010.
The Swiss government tends to emphasize disarmament over
nonproliferation in the framework of the NPT. Switzerland
plans once again to co-sponsor a resolution in the UN First
Committee on de-alerting nuclear weapons. It also is
developing an initiative for a "ban on use" of nuclear
weapons, but key contacts have been vague on the initiative's
form, content, and timing, other than to indicate that, as
conceived, it would be further reaching than negative
security assurances and not likely ready for discussion until
after this year's UN First Committee.


2. (C) Summary continued: As a general rule, Switzerland
sees its comparative advantage in multilateral fora in
pursuing variable diplomatic constellations of convenience to
meet its national objectives. Switzerland is a member of the
IAEA BOG for 2007-2010. Switzerland is a member of the
Conference on Disarmament (CD). FDFA contacts report that

the Swiss government has proposed long-time Swiss PermRep to
the CD, Ambassador Juerg Streuli, to chair negotiations on a
FMCT. The Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) has
the overall Swiss government lead on arms control,
disarmament, and nonproliferation policy issues. The Federal
Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA) also plays an important
role in the policy process, particularly with regard to
export controls and sanctions implementation. The Swiss
government will assess nuclear arms control and
nonproliferation policies or positions based on whether the
policies/positions are non-discriminatory, verifiable, and
legally-binding. Swiss academia and NGOs generally are a
remote presence on NPT-related issues, as is the Swiss
Parliament. However, the Swiss chapter of the International
Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) has the
task of organizing the next (19th) IPPNW World Congress,
which will be held in Basel in August 2010. End Summary.

--------------
NPT-related Questions
--------------


3. (C) Per reftels A and C, post offers the following
feedback on issues related to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty (NPT),arms control, Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban
Treaty (CTBT),and Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT):

Q: What is the Swiss government's general attitude towards
CTBT, FMCT, NPT, and U.S.-Russian arms control efforts? What
factors influence its attitudes and positions?

A: The Swiss government strongly supports entry into force
of the CTBT, negotiations on a verifiable FMCT, and efforts
to reinforce the NPT, particularly with regard to disarmament
and arms control issues. The Swiss welcome U.S.-Russian
nuclear disarmament negotiations, and are convinced that
near-term progress on U.S.-Russian nuclear disarmament
negotiations will be essential to setting the stage for a
successful NPT Review Conference in May 2010.

The Swiss government tends to emphasize disarmament over
nonproliferation in the framework of the NPT, and Swiss
officials and pundits are convinced that the success of the
next NPT RevCon will depend more on further progress on
nuclear disarmament than on nonproliferation. This emphasis
to some degree reflects Switzerland's unusual circumstance as

a neutral nation standing outside of NATO and the EU, and
thus disconnected from the security commitments ultimately
underwritten (explicitly or implicitly) by Western nuclear
weapon states. Switzerland's views on the NPT also are
driven by the same general forces shaping public attitudes in
other European countries, with many Swiss finding it
difficult to understand why the nuclear weapon states
continue to maintain and to modernize large nuclear arsenals.
When evaluating arms control and disarmament agreements, the
Swiss government's mantra is "non-discriminatory, verifiable,
and legally binding."

Q: What positions on CTBT, FMCT, NPT, and U.S.-Russian arms
control efforts is the Swiss government likely to take in
upcoming fora, such as the Conference on Disarmament, the
UNGA First (Disarmament) Committee, and the NPT RevCon in
2010?

A: Switzerland is a CTBT Annex 2 country that ratified the
Treaty in 1999. The Swiss government strongly supports entry
into force of the CTBT.

As a member of the Conference on Disarmament, Switzerland
strongly supports immediate commencement of negotiations on a
verifiable FMCT.

For the Swiss, a successful substantive outcome of the 2010
NPT RevCon would be a consensus document that contains new
obligations for nuclear weapon states, along the lines of the
1995 NPT RevCon objectives and the 2000 NPT RevCon "13 Steps"
-- especially with regard to CTBT ratification and
commencement of negotiations on a verifiable FMCT.

The Swiss government is developing an initiative for a "ban
on use" of nuclear weapons, but key contacts have been vague
on its form and content, other than to indicate that, as
conceived, it would be further reaching than negative
security assurances. Those same Swiss contacts report that
they do not think that the "ban on use" idea will be ripe
enough for the UN First Committee. While explaining that the
idea is still a work-in-progress, they indicate that they
view it as a possible initiative for the NPT RevCon. It is
unclear whether the Swiss have already shared the idea in
detail with other countries, with a view to garnering
support, but Swiss contacts indicate they expect to do so.

In assessing progress in U.S.-Russian nuclear disarmament
negotiations, Switzerland can be expected to emphasize
transparency, verifiability, and that any agreement should be
legally binding.

As in recent past years, the Swiss government, in cooperation
with a number of other governments, plans once again this
year to table a UN First Committee resolution on decreasing
the operational readiness of nuclear weapon systems (i.e.,
de-alerting). Swiss experts are convinced that the barriers
to de-alerting are political, not technical/operational, and
argue that acceptance of a de-alerting resolution by nuclear
weapon states in the First Committee would help to set a
positive atmosphere for the subsequent NPT RevCon.

Q: With which countries does Switzerland work most closely
on these issues?

A: In 2008, Switzerland co-sponsored its UN First Committee
de-alerting resolution with Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand,
Nigeria, and Sweden. As a general rule, Switzerland -- as a
neutral "Western Group" nation -- sees its comparative
advantage in multilateral fora in pursuing variable
diplomatic constellations of convenience to meet its national
objectives. In promoting initiatives in multilateral fora,
the Swiss generally favor working closely with small- to
medium-sized states, and consciously steer clear of the
company of bad or otherwise controversial actors with regard
to anything they co-sponsor or collectively champion.
Against this backdrop, some Swiss affinity for working with
Nordic states and Ireland is evident.

Q: Who are key government personnel involved in nuclear arms
control and nonproliferation decision-making in the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, related ministries, and their diplomatic
missions to arms control fora?

A: The Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) has the
overall Swiss government lead on arms control, disarmament,
and nonproliferation policy issues. The Federal Department
of Economic Affairs (FDEA) also plays an important role in
the policy process, particularly the FDEA's State Secretariat
for Economic Affairs (SECO),which is responsible for export
controls and sanctions implementation. The Federal
Department of Environment, Transport, Energy. and
Communications (DETEC) has a secondary role in NPT-related
policy making, and defers to FDFA and SECO on issues that do
not have direct relevance for the nuclear industry or
environment.

FDFA: Aside from Foreign Minister Calmy-Rey, who only will
be familiar with the broad outlines of the issues, the key
senior policy-maker for NPT-related issues at the FDFA is
State Secretary (Deputy Minister/PolDir) Michael Ambuehl.
The most important NPT-related, expert level policy-maker is
Andreas Friedrich, Head of the FDFA's Arms Control and
Disarmament Section. Friedrich has been working on arms
control, disarmament, and nonproliferation issues for decades
at the FDFA, and is widely respected for his expertise within
Swiss government circles. In addition to Friedrich, Ambuehl
has appointed Dr. Christian Schoenenberger as Head of the
"Swiss NPT Task Force." However, Schoenenberger appears thus
far to be focused on working on the "ban on use" initiative
that the Swiss government is developing, and indications thus
far are that Friedrich remains the main overall POC for the
range of NPT-related topics.

FDEA/SECO: Aside from Economic Minister Leuthard, who only
will be familiar with the broad outlines of the issues, State
Secretary (Deputy Minister) Jean-Daniel Gerber is the key
senior policy-maker for NPT-related issues at the FDEA.
Below Gerber, our key interlocutor is Erwin Bollinger, Head
of the Sanctions and Export Policy Division.

DETEC: Aside from Energy Minister Leuenberger, who only will
be familiar with the broad outlines of the issues, Dr. Walter
Steinmann, Director of the Federal Office of Energy (FOE),is
our most important DETEC interlocutor. Steinmann serves as
Switzerland's Governor on the Board of Governors (BOG) of the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Below Steinmann,
Pierre Multone, the FOE's Special Representative for
International Nuclear Affairs is the most important DETEC
interlocutor for NPT-related issues.

Q: What role does Switzerland play in arms control and
nonproliferation organizations? Do the Swiss take a
leadership role on any issues?

A: Given Switzerland's unique international profile and the
presence of UN agencies in Geneva, the Swiss government often
enjoys disproportionate influence in international fora.
However, the Swiss government often takes a low-key approach
to politically contentious issues in arms control and
nonproliferation organizations -- probably at least in part
to preserve its real or perceived capacity to mediate
disputes.

Switzerland is a member of the IAEA BOG for 2007-2010.

Switzerland is a member of the Conference on Disarmament
(CD). FDFA contacts report that the Swiss government has
proposed long-time Swiss PermRep to the CD, Ambassador Juerg
Streuli, to chair negotiations on a FMCT.

Switzerland has been a member of the UN since 2002, and in
recent years has co-sponsored a UN First Committee resolution
on de-alerting nuclear weapons.

Q: How does the nuclear arms control and nonproliferation
policy-making process work in Switzerland, and what is the

interplay among government officials and agencies? Which
people and agencies carry the most weight, and on which
issues?

A: As noted above, the FDFA has the overall policy lead on
NPT-related issues, in close coordination with the FDEA/SECO
and, to a lesser extent, DETEC. There are no more than 15-20
experts on NPT-related issues in the entire Swiss government,
and interagency coordination appears to function smoothly.
The FDFA (Ambuehl/Friedrich) enjoys primacy on all high
policy issues. FDEA/SECO (Gerber/Bollinger) has more
leverage on sanctions implementation and export regime
topics. DETEC (Steinmann/Multone) has the greatest input on
topics affecting significant equities of the nuclear industry
and environment -- i.e., technical cooperation, such as
proposals for multilateral nuclear fuel banks and nuclear
waste disposal.

Q: What are the key factors that drive Swiss adoption or
rejection of particular policies or positions on nuclear arms
control or nonproliferation issues?

A: The Swiss government will assess nuclear arms control and
nonproliferation policies or positions based on whether the
policies/positions are non-discriminatory, verifiable, and
legally-binding. The Swiss will tend to favor nuclear
disarmament and arms control over nonproliferation, arguing
that greater progress on nuclear disarmament will allow
like-minded states to gain more traction on nonproliferation
initiatives.

Q: How many people in Switzerland's Missions (New York,
Geneva, and Vienna) to arms control fora deal with arms
control and nonproliferation issues? Who are they? Are
Swiss Mission personnel and resources augmented during key
relevant meetings?

A: Post does not have access to detailed information
regarding which staff at the Swiss multilateral Missions have
expertise in NPT-related issues, but it is certain that the
Swiss Missions to the UN-New York, CD-Geneva, and IAEA-Vienna
are relatively thinly staffed in general, and must routinely
be augmented by experts from capital during major meetings.
Ambassador Streuli, Swiss PermRep to the CD, is reputedly a
subject expert in the field of arms control and disarmament,
but post has not had contact with him or the other Swiss
Mission PermReps. FDFA contacts report that the FDFA has
submitted to the Swiss Parliament a request for a
multi-million dollar budget increase for arms control and
disarmament programming, in part to allow the FDFA to fund
additional staff to support Streuli, if he is selected to
chair the FMCT negotiations.

Q: What are the roles and influence of Switzerland's nuclear
power industry, academia, and non-governmental organizations
in nuclear arms control and nonproliferation decision-making?

A: The influence of the Swiss nuclear power industry on
NPT-related issues is generally limited, except for in the
area of nuclear cooperation and fuel cycle technology
controls. Whether in response to urging that Switzerland
move from observer to participant in the Global Nuclear
Energy Partnership (GNEP),or with regard to calls for Swiss
support to possible multilateral nuclear fuel initiatives,
the Swiss argue that current commercial supply of nuclear
fuel is working fine, and claim that Switzerland is leery of
becoming part of a nuclear "cartel" that could end up
undercutting Swiss options for nuclear cooperation.

Swiss academia and NGOs generally are a remote presence on
NPT-related issues, as is the Swiss Parliament. However, the
Swiss chapter of the International Physicians for the
Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) has the task of organizing
the next (19th) IPPNW World Congress, which will be held in
Basel in August 2010. Swiss IPPNW representatives already
have been in touch with post regarding their request for an
appropriate USG speaker at that event.

Q: What are the key alliances with other governments on arms
control and nonproliferation issues? For example, the
Nonaligned Movement (NAM) and the Group of 77 (G-77)? To
what extent does Switzerland appear to influence, follow, or
diverge from the NAM or G-77 line?

A: Aside from Switzerland's de-alerting resolution in the UN
First Committee, post is not aware of any key alliances or
relationships that the Swiss have with other governments on
NPT-related issues. Switzerland's emphasis on nuclear
disarmament issues generally parallels some NAM and G-77
recurring themes, and the Swiss often demonstrate sensitivity
to NAM and G-77 views. However, Switzerland is not, of
course, a member of either organization, and quite frequently
laments (at least behind closed doors) unreasonable and
unconstructive positions taken by the NAM/G-77. The Swiss
ability to influence NAM/G-77 positions appears limited, and
perhaps not used to its full potential, presumably due to the
Swiss inclination to avoid controversy.

Q: How much flexibility do the Swiss Missions to the UN, CD,
and IAEA appear to have, and to what extent do they appear to
receive guidance from capital? To what extent do they need
further guidance from capital to engage on RevCon objectives?

A: This is difficult for post to assess, though FDFA
discipline and hierarchy is less pronounced than in many
European foreign ministries, and Swiss diplomats sometimes
appear to take a more interpretive approach to their
instructions than diplomats in some other European countries.
We have on some occasions (particularly with regard to the
IAEA),had indications that timely interventions here in
capital in close coordination with U.S. Mission colleagues
have helped to move the Swiss position in positive ways.
However, it was not clear whether such occasions represented
a reigning in of free-lancing Swiss Mission representatives,
or simply a change in the Swiss government's position.


4. (U) Post will continue to report on NPT-related Swiss
developments, and appreciates Department's support as we work
to leverage Swiss engagement in this area toward positive
outcomes.
BEYER