Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BELGRADE996
2009-09-03 08:47:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Belgrade
Cable title:  

SERBIA: PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW ENACTED

Tags:  ECON KIDE KPRV CASC EAID SR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBW #0996 2460848
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030847Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0188
INFO RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
UNCLAS BELGRADE 000996 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/OHI - JOHN BECKER AND EUR/SCE
AID FOR E&E/ECA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON KIDE KPRV CASC EAID SR
SUBJECT: SERBIA: PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW ENACTED

REF: BELGRADE 725; BELGRAGE 801; BELGRADE 791

SUMMARY
-------

UNCLAS BELGRADE 000996

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/OHI - JOHN BECKER AND EUR/SCE
AID FOR E&E/ECA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON KIDE KPRV CASC EAID SR
SUBJECT: SERBIA: PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW ENACTED

REF: BELGRADE 725; BELGRAGE 801; BELGRADE 791

SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) On August 31, Serbia's parliament passed the Planning and
Construction law, which will streamline construction permitting and
clarify land ownership issues, but which has also been strongly
opposed by domestic and international restitution claimants.
Following the passage, Charge met with the law's sponsor, Environment
and Zoning Minister Oliver Dulic, to state our continued concerns
about the legislation and to encourage him to work closely with the
Finance Ministry to support the finalization and implementation of a
comprehensive restitution law as soon as possible. Despite the
government's insistence that the newly passed legislation will
improve zoning and streamline business processes, the law's passage
is a bad signal of Serbia's commitment to transparently and
effectively resolve the restitution claims from last century. End
Summary.

PARLIAMENT PASSES LAW
--------------


2. (SBU) Serbia's parliament passed the Planning and Construction
Law on August 31, with 122 out of the 129 Members of Parliament
present voting in favor of the law. The law focuses on zoning and
urban planning, property rights on construction land, construction
permitting procedures, and legalization of property titles. The law,
however, also greatly impacts pending restitution claims, effectively
closing the door on in-kind restitution for construction land. In
addition, it envisions allowing current leaseholders of construction
land to convert their lease and usage rights into ownerships rights.
The proceeds from the conversion cost are to be shared between local
government budgets and a "restitution fund" (ref A).

KEEPING PRESSURE ON THE GOVERNMENT
--------------


3. (SBU) Building upon our efforts to voice concerns about the
legislation and to encourage a fair and transparent approach to
restitution (ref B),Charge told Minister Dulic on September 1 that
the United States remained concerned about the law and would be
carefully watching its implementation. The Charge encouraged Dulic
to use an independent trust manager to oversee any restitution fund
in order to safeguard such funds from political meddling. The Charge
also asked Dulic to work with the Finance Ministry in order to draft
and pass an effective restitution law by the end of this year. (The
Finance Ministry intends to hold a conference regarding restitution
on September 23, with the support of the Council of Europe.)


4. (SBU) Dulic replied that the Planning and Construction law was
essential for improving Serbia's investment climate, by streamlining
the issuance of construction permits and to provide clear ownership
rights. He said several bylaws were needed before the law could be
enacted and he said he would work closely with the Finance Ministry
on these regulations, particularly those which would oversee the
conversion proceeds earmarked for restitution. Washing his hands of
the financial implications of this legislation, Dulic insisted the
Finance Ministry would be responsible for managing the future funds
marked for restitution.


COMMENT
--------------


5. (SBU) While the new Planning and Construction law may streamline
business processes and address many of the issues that have pulled
down Serbia's competitiveness rankings, its passage has greatly
complicated and diminished the hope of an effective transparent
restitution law in Serbia. Despite government claims that such a law
is coming by the end of this year, we have seen little effort from
the Finance Ministry on this issue. As the Planning and Construction
law goes into effect, we will be closely monitoring its
implementation, particularly with regard to how the values of
properties are assessed and how payments to restitution claimants are
processed, and will continue to press vigorously for a clear and
transparent restitution law. End Comment.
BRUSH